Evaluation of effect of cooled haemodialysis on cognition in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ECHECKED) feasibility randomised controlled trial results.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BMC Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03883-6
Indranil Dasgupta, Aghogho Odudu, Jyoti Baharani, Niall Fergusson, Helen Griffiths, John Harrison, Awais Hameed, Paul Maruff, Louise Ryan, Neil Thomas, Gavin Woodhall, George Tadros
{"title":"Evaluation of effect of cooled haemodialysis on cognition in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ECHECKED) feasibility randomised controlled trial results.","authors":"Indranil Dasgupta, Aghogho Odudu, Jyoti Baharani, Niall Fergusson, Helen Griffiths, John Harrison, Awais Hameed, Paul Maruff, Louise Ryan, Neil Thomas, Gavin Woodhall, George Tadros","doi":"10.1186/s12882-024-03883-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common in haemodialysis patients with no known beneficial interventions. Cooler dialysate slows brain white-matter changes, but its effect on cognition is unknown. This feasibility trial was performed to inform a fully-powered, randomised trial to assess this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to randomise (1:1) 90 haemodialysis patients to this double-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial to standard care (dialysate-temperature 36.5 °C) or intervention (35 °C). Eligible patients were adult chronic haemodialysis recipients with no established diagnosis of dementia or psychiatric disease. The primary outcome was change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 12-months. Secondary outcomes included recruitment and attrition rates, reasons for non-recruitment, intradialytic hypotension, depression, patient burden, computerised cognition test battery, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 334 patients screened, 160 were eligible. 99 declined mainly for the extra non-dialysis day study visits. Sixty-one patients consented, 43 randomised - 20 in standard care, 23 in intervention arms; 13 withdrew for non-dialysis day visits and 5 without reason before randomisation. 27 patients (12 standard care, 15 intervention) completed the trial - 5 died, 1 transplanted, 4 withdrew consent, and 6 could not attend due to the pandemic. Low temperature dialysis was well tolerated. There was no difference in change in MoCA from baseline to 12 months between the standard and intervention arms; 1.0 (-2.8-3.0, p = 0.755) and - 2.0 (-1.0 - -4.0, p = 0.047) respectively. There were no differences between groups on any secondary measures. There were no significant adverse events reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The trial was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic contributing to an attrition rate of 27%. The non-dialysis day research visits were mainly responsible for low recruitment and consent withdrawal. There are several learning points, described in the article, which will inform design of definitive trials in this area in the future.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03645733. Registration date 24/08/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"25 1","pages":"466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03883-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in haemodialysis patients with no known beneficial interventions. Cooler dialysate slows brain white-matter changes, but its effect on cognition is unknown. This feasibility trial was performed to inform a fully-powered, randomised trial to assess this.

Methods: We aimed to randomise (1:1) 90 haemodialysis patients to this double-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial to standard care (dialysate-temperature 36.5 °C) or intervention (35 °C). Eligible patients were adult chronic haemodialysis recipients with no established diagnosis of dementia or psychiatric disease. The primary outcome was change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 12-months. Secondary outcomes included recruitment and attrition rates, reasons for non-recruitment, intradialytic hypotension, depression, patient burden, computerised cognition test battery, and quality of life.

Findings: Of 334 patients screened, 160 were eligible. 99 declined mainly for the extra non-dialysis day study visits. Sixty-one patients consented, 43 randomised - 20 in standard care, 23 in intervention arms; 13 withdrew for non-dialysis day visits and 5 without reason before randomisation. 27 patients (12 standard care, 15 intervention) completed the trial - 5 died, 1 transplanted, 4 withdrew consent, and 6 could not attend due to the pandemic. Low temperature dialysis was well tolerated. There was no difference in change in MoCA from baseline to 12 months between the standard and intervention arms; 1.0 (-2.8-3.0, p = 0.755) and - 2.0 (-1.0 - -4.0, p = 0.047) respectively. There were no differences between groups on any secondary measures. There were no significant adverse events reported.

Discussion: The trial was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic contributing to an attrition rate of 27%. The non-dialysis day research visits were mainly responsible for low recruitment and consent withdrawal. There are several learning points, described in the article, which will inform design of definitive trials in this area in the future.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03645733. Registration date 24/08/2018.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估冷血透析对终末期肾病患者认知能力的影响(ECHECKED)可行性随机对照试验结果。
背景:认知障碍在血液透析患者中很常见,没有已知的有益干预措施。较冷的透析液减缓了脑白质的变化,但其对认知的影响尚不清楚。进行可行性试验是为了为一项全动力随机试验提供信息来评估这一点。方法:我们的目标是将90名血液透析患者随机(1:1)分组到标准治疗(透析温度36.5℃)或干预(35℃)的双盲、随机对照可行性试验中。符合条件的患者是成人慢性血液透析患者,没有明确的痴呆或精神疾病诊断。主要结果是12个月时蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分的变化。次要结局包括招募和减员率、未招募的原因、分析性低血压、抑郁、患者负担、计算机化认知测试电池和生活质量。结果:在筛选的334例患者中,有160例符合条件。99的下降主要是额外的非透析日研究访问。61名患者同意,43名随机分组——20名标准治疗组,23名干预组;13人因非透析日访而退出,5人在随机分组前无故退出。27例患者(12例标准治疗,15例干预)完成了试验,其中5例死亡,1例移植,4例撤回同意,6例因大流行而无法参加试验。低温透析耐受性良好。从基线到12个月,标准组和干预组之间的MoCA变化没有差异;1.0 (-2.8 - -3.0, p = 0.755), 2.0 (-1.0 - -4.0, p = 0.047)。两组在任何次要指标上均无差异。没有明显的不良事件报道。讨论:该试验受到COVID-19大流行的显著影响,导致损耗率为27%。非透析日研究访问是低招募率和撤回同意的主要原因。有几个学习点,在文章中描述,这将告知设计明确的试验在这一领域的未来。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03645733。注册日期:24/08/2018
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Saudi Arabia: an epidemiological population-based study. Depression as a risk factor for osteoporosis independent of sarcopenia in hemodialysis patients: findings from a multicenter cross-sectional study. Survival in patients with CKD 3-5 after 12 months of exercise training - a post-hoc analysis of the RENEXC trial. Health-related quality of life in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease in low and middle-income countries. Immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional diseases of patients after kidney transplantation: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1