Evaluating the impact of a tertiary multidisciplinary meeting in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103861
Belinda Sassé, Sammy Shaya, Jessica Nimmo, Katie Cao, Daphne Day, Katie Evans, Catherine Healy, Gwo-Yaw Ho, Gillian Kruss, Amelia McCartney, Linda Mojzisova, Ranjana Srivastava, Jennifer Tan, Mun Yee Tan, Kate Webber, Michelle White, Steven David, Marion Harris
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of a tertiary multidisciplinary meeting in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study.","authors":"Belinda Sassé, Sammy Shaya, Jessica Nimmo, Katie Cao, Daphne Day, Katie Evans, Catherine Healy, Gwo-Yaw Ho, Gillian Kruss, Amelia McCartney, Linda Mojzisova, Ranjana Srivastava, Jennifer Tan, Mun Yee Tan, Kate Webber, Michelle White, Steven David, Marion Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) guidelines recommend multidisciplinary meetings (MDM), but there is limited research on their impact. This prospective study examines the impact of an mBC MDM on management plans, their implementation rate, and costs and benefits at an Australian metropolitan breast cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive mBC MDM patients were enrolled. Oncologists recorded their management plans before the MDM. Following the MDM, consensus plan was recorded and compared to the pre-MDM plan. Plans were categorised as no change, low impact, or high impact. High impact was defined as major treatment change or trial referral. Plan implementation was assessed four months post-MDM. Co-primary endpoints were proportion of plans changed pre/post-MDM and the proportion of high vs. low-impact changes. Estimates of time spent on the MDM and time savings were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>114 MDM presentations for 95 patients were recorded from October 2023 to July 2024. 65 (57.0 %) presentations resulted in a plan change (p < 0.001); 32 (28.1 %) were high impact (p < 0.001). Follow up data was collected for 77 presentations; 65 (84.4 %) were fully implemented. 42 presentations resulted in high impact recommendations, of which 39 were implemented (92.6 %) (p = 0.005). The MDM earned $571.18/week with estimated costs of $1584.63, a $1013.45 deficit. Costs were likely offset by estimated savings from improved clinic efficiencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBC MDMs result in significant, actionable changes to patient management. 28.1 % of presentations resulted in treatment changes, almost all of which were implemented. Costs were offset by improved clinic efficiencies. MBC MDMs enhance care in this diverse patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"79 ","pages":"103861"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) guidelines recommend multidisciplinary meetings (MDM), but there is limited research on their impact. This prospective study examines the impact of an mBC MDM on management plans, their implementation rate, and costs and benefits at an Australian metropolitan breast cancer center.

Methods: Consecutive mBC MDM patients were enrolled. Oncologists recorded their management plans before the MDM. Following the MDM, consensus plan was recorded and compared to the pre-MDM plan. Plans were categorised as no change, low impact, or high impact. High impact was defined as major treatment change or trial referral. Plan implementation was assessed four months post-MDM. Co-primary endpoints were proportion of plans changed pre/post-MDM and the proportion of high vs. low-impact changes. Estimates of time spent on the MDM and time savings were collected.

Results: 114 MDM presentations for 95 patients were recorded from October 2023 to July 2024. 65 (57.0 %) presentations resulted in a plan change (p < 0.001); 32 (28.1 %) were high impact (p < 0.001). Follow up data was collected for 77 presentations; 65 (84.4 %) were fully implemented. 42 presentations resulted in high impact recommendations, of which 39 were implemented (92.6 %) (p = 0.005). The MDM earned $571.18/week with estimated costs of $1584.63, a $1013.45 deficit. Costs were likely offset by estimated savings from improved clinic efficiencies.

Conclusion: MBC MDMs result in significant, actionable changes to patient management. 28.1 % of presentations resulted in treatment changes, almost all of which were implemented. Costs were offset by improved clinic efficiencies. MBC MDMs enhance care in this diverse patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
期刊最新文献
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i): Mechanisms of resistance and where to find them. Trends in breast cancer among elderly women: Development in estrogen and HER2 subtypes in the last ten years. Evaluating the impact of a tertiary multidisciplinary meeting in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study. Survival feature and trend of female breast cancer: A comprehensive review of survival analysis from cancer registration data. Beyond Hormone Receptors: liquid biopsy tools to unveil new clinical meanings and empower therapeutic decision-making in Luminal-like metastatic breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1