Psychometric Properties of a Self-Report Measure of Overprotective Parenting: The Parental Overprotection Measure (POM).

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Child Psychiatry & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01801-3
Ronald M Rapee, Susan L Edwards, Shabana Mabood, Justin Y A Freeman
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of a Self-Report Measure of Overprotective Parenting: The Parental Overprotection Measure (POM).","authors":"Ronald M Rapee, Susan L Edwards, Shabana Mabood, Justin Y A Freeman","doi":"10.1007/s10578-024-01801-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few psychometrically sound measures of overprotection designed for the caregiver and focusing largely on overt behaviours and actions. The Parental Overprotection Measure (POM) was developed for research with preschool aged children and has been used in a range of research projects and translated into several languages. However, its full psychometric properties have not previously been reported. The aim of the current paper was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the original, English-language version of the POM. Mothers (N = 288) of children aged between 36 and 71 months completed the POM along with measures assessing validity. A subsample (n = 86) also repeated the POM after approximately 5 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis of the present sample, did not show very clear factor structure and we therefore recommend use of the full scale at this stage. However, two, potentially interpretable factors related to restriction and comfort. Reliability for both factors and the total was strong (alphas and omegas .74 to .90) and the (sub)scales all showed good retest reliability (.72 to .75). Correlations with other measures of overprotection were moderate for the total and restriction scales but smaller for comfort and the two subscales correlated differently from each other with other aspects of parenting. The total and restriction subscale correlated moderately with child anxiety but the comfort subscale failed to relate significantly. Overall, the POM shows solid psychometric properties and could be used as a self-report measure of caregiver overprotection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01801-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are few psychometrically sound measures of overprotection designed for the caregiver and focusing largely on overt behaviours and actions. The Parental Overprotection Measure (POM) was developed for research with preschool aged children and has been used in a range of research projects and translated into several languages. However, its full psychometric properties have not previously been reported. The aim of the current paper was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the original, English-language version of the POM. Mothers (N = 288) of children aged between 36 and 71 months completed the POM along with measures assessing validity. A subsample (n = 86) also repeated the POM after approximately 5 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis of the present sample, did not show very clear factor structure and we therefore recommend use of the full scale at this stage. However, two, potentially interpretable factors related to restriction and comfort. Reliability for both factors and the total was strong (alphas and omegas .74 to .90) and the (sub)scales all showed good retest reliability (.72 to .75). Correlations with other measures of overprotection were moderate for the total and restriction scales but smaller for comfort and the two subscales correlated differently from each other with other aspects of parenting. The total and restriction subscale correlated moderately with child anxiety but the comfort subscale failed to relate significantly. Overall, the POM shows solid psychometric properties and could be used as a self-report measure of caregiver overprotection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过度保护父母自我报告测量的心理测量特性:父母过度保护测量(POM)。
很少有心理测量学上合理的过度保护措施是为照顾者设计的,而且主要集中在公开的行为和行动上。父母过度保护措施(POM)是为学龄前儿童的研究而制定的,已在一系列研究项目中使用,并被翻译成几种语言。然而,其完整的心理测量特性尚未被报道。当前论文的目的是评估原始的英语版本的POM的心理测量特性。年龄在36 ~ 71个月的儿童的母亲(N = 288)完成了POM和效度评估措施。一个子样本(n = 86)在大约5周后也重复了POM。探索性因子分析目前的样本,并没有显示非常明确的因子结构,因此我们建议在这个阶段使用全量表。然而,有两个潜在的可解释因素与限制和舒适有关。两个因素和总体的信度都很强(α和ω为0.74至0.90),(子)量表都显示出良好的重测信度(。72到0.75)。总体量表和限制量表与其他过度保护指标的相关性适中,但与舒适量表的相关性较小,两个子量表与养育子女的其他方面的相关性不同。总分和限制分量表与儿童焦虑有中度相关,而舒适分量表与儿童焦虑无显著相关。总的来说,POM显示了坚实的心理测量特性,可以用作照顾者过度保护的自我报告测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Predictive Value of Preadolescent Suicidal Ideation Reporter Discrepancies in the ABCD Study. Expert Rater Agreement for Symptoms and Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in Youth. Heterogeneity in Developmental Trajectories of Internalizing and Externalizing Symptomatology: Associations with Risk and Protective Factors. Impact of Positive Childhood Experiences (PCEs): A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Training Community Clinicians in Implementing CBT-ERP for Youth with OCD: A Pilot Study in Australian Community Mental Health Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1