Clozapine rechallenge following myocarditis: a systematic review of rechallenge cases.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY CNS Spectrums Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1017/S1092852924002219
Laura McMahon, Maddison Giudice, Elias Wagner, Alkomiet Hasan, Matthew K Burrage, John Amerena, Cooper Fox, Karl Winckel, Timothy Tanzer, Lesley Smith, Nicola Warren, Dan Siskind, Nicole Korman
{"title":"Clozapine rechallenge following myocarditis: a systematic review of rechallenge cases.","authors":"Laura McMahon, Maddison Giudice, Elias Wagner, Alkomiet Hasan, Matthew K Burrage, John Amerena, Cooper Fox, Karl Winckel, Timothy Tanzer, Lesley Smith, Nicola Warren, Dan Siskind, Nicole Korman","doi":"10.1017/S1092852924002219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Clozapine is the antipsychotic medication with the greatest efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Unfortunately, clozapine is ceased in approximately 0.2% to 8.5% of people due to concerns about clozapine-associated myocarditis (CAM). The opportunity for clozapine rechallenge is important for people with TRS and CAM, due to limited alternative treatments. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal process, monitoring, and dose titration to achieve successful clozapine rechallenge. The study aimed to review the process, monitoring, and dose titration within cases of clozapine rechallenge after CAM, to identify features associated with successful rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of clozapine rechallenge cases following CAM was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, and PsycINFO were searched for cases. Reference lists of retrieved articles and field experts were consulted to identify additional studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five cases were identified that described clozapine rechallenge, 31 of which were successful. Successful rechallenge cases generally used a slower dose titration regime with more frequent monitoring than standard clozapine initiation protocols; however, this data was not always completely recorded within cases. Six cases referred to published rechallenge protocols to guide their rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The process, monitoring, and dose titration of clozapine rechallenge are inconsistently reported in the literature. Despite this, 69% of case reports detailed a successful rechallenge post CAM; noting limitations associated with reliance on case data. Ensuring published clozapine rechallenge cases report standardised data, including titration speed and monitoring frequencies, is required to guide the development and validation of guidelines for clozapine rechallenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":" ","pages":"585-592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924002219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Clozapine is the antipsychotic medication with the greatest efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Unfortunately, clozapine is ceased in approximately 0.2% to 8.5% of people due to concerns about clozapine-associated myocarditis (CAM). The opportunity for clozapine rechallenge is important for people with TRS and CAM, due to limited alternative treatments. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal process, monitoring, and dose titration to achieve successful clozapine rechallenge. The study aimed to review the process, monitoring, and dose titration within cases of clozapine rechallenge after CAM, to identify features associated with successful rechallenge.

Methods: A systematic review of clozapine rechallenge cases following CAM was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, and PsycINFO were searched for cases. Reference lists of retrieved articles and field experts were consulted to identify additional studies.

Results: Forty-five cases were identified that described clozapine rechallenge, 31 of which were successful. Successful rechallenge cases generally used a slower dose titration regime with more frequent monitoring than standard clozapine initiation protocols; however, this data was not always completely recorded within cases. Six cases referred to published rechallenge protocols to guide their rechallenge.

Conclusions: The process, monitoring, and dose titration of clozapine rechallenge are inconsistently reported in the literature. Despite this, 69% of case reports detailed a successful rechallenge post CAM; noting limitations associated with reliance on case data. Ensuring published clozapine rechallenge cases report standardised data, including titration speed and monitoring frequencies, is required to guide the development and validation of guidelines for clozapine rechallenge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌炎后氯氮平再挑战:再挑战病例的系统回顾。
简介和目的:氯氮平是治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)最有效的抗精神病药物。不幸的是,由于担心氯氮平相关性心肌炎(CAM),大约0.2%至8.5%的人停止使用氯氮平。由于替代治疗有限,对TRS和CAM患者来说,氯氮平再挑战的机会很重要。然而,对于实现氯氮平再灌注的最佳过程、监测和剂量滴定缺乏共识。本研究旨在回顾CAM后氯氮平再灌注的过程、监测和剂量滴定,以确定与再灌注成功相关的特征。方法:对CAM术后氯氮平再挑战病例进行系统回顾。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cinahl和PsycINFO。查阅了检索文章的参考清单和领域专家,以确定其他研究。结果:共鉴定氯氮平再挑战45例,其中31例成功。成功的再挑战病例通常使用较慢的剂量滴定方案,比标准氯氮平起始方案更频繁地监测;然而,这些数据并不总是完全记录在病例中。6个案例参考了已公布的再挑战协议,以指导他们的再挑战。结论:文献中氯氮平再灌注的过程、监测和剂量滴定的报道不一致。尽管如此,69%的病例报告详细描述了CAM后成功的再挑战;注意到依赖病例数据的局限性。确保公布的氯氮平再挑战病例报告标准化数据,包括滴定速度和监测频率,以指导氯氮平再挑战指南的制定和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Do antipsychotic medications work: An exploration using competency to stand trial as the functional outcome. Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT): An Emerging Best Practice. Attenuated mental symptoms in the general population: first data from the observational cross-sectional ATTENTION study in Greece. The Effect of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Glucose Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor Agonists on Neurogenesis, Differentiation and Plasticity: Potential Mechanistically-Informed Therapeutics in the Treatment and Prevention of Mental Disorders. Understanding the delivery technology used in ADHD stimulant medications can help to individualize treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1