Quality of YouTube videos on botulinum toxin management in bruxism, assessed using the DISCERN instrument.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/168410
Oskar Komisarek, Aleksandra Śledzińska, Jacek Kwiatkowski, Marek Bebyn, Paulina Śledzińska
{"title":"Quality of YouTube videos on botulinum toxin management in bruxism, assessed using the DISCERN instrument.","authors":"Oskar Komisarek, Aleksandra Śledzińska, Jacek Kwiatkowski, Marek Bebyn, Paulina Śledzińska","doi":"10.17219/dmp/168410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are increasingly turning to Internet platforms for health-related information. An example is YouTube, one of the largest media-sharing networks in the world.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to assess the informational value of YouTube videos on the treatment of bruxism with botulinum toxin, a procedure that is becoming increasingly popular in the field of dentistry.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After collecting 30 videos for each of the 5 keywords, a total of 150 videos were examined. The following search terms were used: 'bruxism Botox treatment'; 'tooth grinding Botox treatment'; 'jaw clenching Botox treatment'; 'Botox for bruxism'; and 'Botox for masseter reduction'. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the video content using the DISCERN scoring system. Additionally, the relationships between quantitative variables, such as video duration, the source of upload and video popularity, and the DISCERN scores, were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean overall DISCERN score was 32.3. The YouTube videos were divided into the following categories based on their DISCERN scores: very poor (26.3%); poor (61.4%); fair (10.5%); good (1.8%); and excellent (0.0%). Videos that addressed risk factors during therapy, treatment outcomes, bruxism symptoms, and the muscle anatomy had significantly higher overall DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, YouTube videos on botulinum toxin treatment for bruxism had poor informational value. It is important that dentists recognize the significance of YouTube as a source of health-related information, and ensure that the content they provide is of the highest quality, accurate and up-to-date.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"61 6","pages":"865-873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/168410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients are increasingly turning to Internet platforms for health-related information. An example is YouTube, one of the largest media-sharing networks in the world.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess the informational value of YouTube videos on the treatment of bruxism with botulinum toxin, a procedure that is becoming increasingly popular in the field of dentistry.

Material and methods: After collecting 30 videos for each of the 5 keywords, a total of 150 videos were examined. The following search terms were used: 'bruxism Botox treatment'; 'tooth grinding Botox treatment'; 'jaw clenching Botox treatment'; 'Botox for bruxism'; and 'Botox for masseter reduction'. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the video content using the DISCERN scoring system. Additionally, the relationships between quantitative variables, such as video duration, the source of upload and video popularity, and the DISCERN scores, were examined.

Results: The mean overall DISCERN score was 32.3. The YouTube videos were divided into the following categories based on their DISCERN scores: very poor (26.3%); poor (61.4%); fair (10.5%); good (1.8%); and excellent (0.0%). Videos that addressed risk factors during therapy, treatment outcomes, bruxism symptoms, and the muscle anatomy had significantly higher overall DISCERN scores.

Conclusions: In general, YouTube videos on botulinum toxin treatment for bruxism had poor informational value. It is important that dentists recognize the significance of YouTube as a source of health-related information, and ensure that the content they provide is of the highest quality, accurate and up-to-date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用DISCERN仪器评估磨牙症中肉毒杆菌毒素管理的YouTube视频质量。
背景:越来越多的患者转向互联网平台获取健康相关信息。一个例子是YouTube,世界上最大的媒体共享网络之一。目的:本研究的目的是评估YouTube视频对肉毒杆菌毒素治疗磨牙症的信息价值,肉毒杆菌毒素治疗在牙科领域越来越流行。材料与方法:对5个关键词各收集30个视频后,共检测150个视频。使用了以下搜索词:“磨牙症肉毒杆菌治疗”;“磨牙肉毒杆菌治疗”;“下巴紧绷肉毒杆菌治疗”;“治疗磨牙症的肉毒杆菌”;以及“减少咬肌的肉毒杆菌”。两位研究人员使用DISCERN评分系统独立评估视频内容的质量。此外,定量变量之间的关系,如视频持续时间,上传的来源和视频的受欢迎程度,和辨别分数,进行了检查。结果:平均总分为32.3分。这些YouTube视频根据其在DISCERN上的得分分为以下几类:非常差(26.3%);可怜的(61.4%);公平(10.5%);好(1.8%);优秀(0.0%)。涉及治疗过程中的危险因素、治疗结果、磨牙症状和肌肉解剖的视频在DISCERN总分中得分明显较高。结论:总的来说,YouTube上关于肉毒杆菌毒素治疗磨牙症的视频信息价值不高。牙医必须认识到YouTube作为健康相关信息来源的重要性,并确保他们提供的内容是最高质量、准确和最新的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Circulating biomarkers of nitrosative stress, protein glycoxidation and inflammation in maxillofacial surgery patients treated with titanium implants. Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy on the salivary levels of IL-18 and IL-35 in patients with periodontitis. Oral health behaviors and tooth decay at the age of 12 and 15-18 years in Poland. Lifestyle, daily habits, sleep hygiene, and diet: Proposal of a new approach for sleep bruxism management. Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1