Three-year Clinical Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique and Ceraseal Premixed Bioceramic Sealer: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.14744/eej.2024.75537
Andrea Spinelli, Fausto Zamparini, Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Carlo Prati
{"title":"Three-year Clinical Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique and Ceraseal Premixed Bioceramic Sealer: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Andrea Spinelli, Fausto Zamparini, Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Carlo Prati","doi":"10.14744/eej.2024.75537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of teeth filled with a single cone technique and a premixed bioceramic sealer at 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy patients were consecutively treated by a cohort of postgraduate operators. Root canal filling procedures were performed with NiTi rotary instrumentation, while non-surgical retreatments were performed using NiTi reciprocating instruments. Root canal filling procedures were performed using Ceraseal and the single cone technique. Post-endodontic restorations were performed after 15 days. Provisional and definitive crowns were positioned in case of non-sufficient coronal structure. Periapical radiographs were made before treatment, after filling, and at each follow-up visit (6, 12, 24 and 36 months). The periapical Index (PAI) was used to assess the presence of periapical lesions and their modifications over time. Success (absence of periapical radiolucency, PAI <3) and survival rates were evaluated. The presence of apical extrusion was also radiographically assessed. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate changes in mean PAI scores, and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate changes in the percentage of healed cases. All analyses were replicated using two distinct approaches: per protocol (PP) (treatments who completed the follow-up) and intention to treat (ITT) (all root canal treatments). A significance level of 5% was used for all statistical tests (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight endodontic treatments in 52 patients were performed (ITT). Thirty-eight endodontic treatments in 33 patients completed the 3 years of follow-up with a survival rate of 92.7%. The success rate was 85.4% (PP).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of Ceraseal associated with the single cone technique was safe in maintaining endodontically affected teeth. (EEJ-2024-01-02).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"9 4","pages":"383-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2024.75537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of teeth filled with a single cone technique and a premixed bioceramic sealer at 3 years of follow-up.

Methods: Healthy patients were consecutively treated by a cohort of postgraduate operators. Root canal filling procedures were performed with NiTi rotary instrumentation, while non-surgical retreatments were performed using NiTi reciprocating instruments. Root canal filling procedures were performed using Ceraseal and the single cone technique. Post-endodontic restorations were performed after 15 days. Provisional and definitive crowns were positioned in case of non-sufficient coronal structure. Periapical radiographs were made before treatment, after filling, and at each follow-up visit (6, 12, 24 and 36 months). The periapical Index (PAI) was used to assess the presence of periapical lesions and their modifications over time. Success (absence of periapical radiolucency, PAI <3) and survival rates were evaluated. The presence of apical extrusion was also radiographically assessed. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate changes in mean PAI scores, and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate changes in the percentage of healed cases. All analyses were replicated using two distinct approaches: per protocol (PP) (treatments who completed the follow-up) and intention to treat (ITT) (all root canal treatments). A significance level of 5% was used for all statistical tests (α=0.05).

Results: Fifty-eight endodontic treatments in 52 patients were performed (ITT). Thirty-eight endodontic treatments in 33 patients completed the 3 years of follow-up with a survival rate of 92.7%. The success rate was 85.4% (PP).

Conclusion: The use of Ceraseal associated with the single cone technique was safe in maintaining endodontically affected teeth. (EEJ-2024-01-02).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Effect of Final Irrigation Solutions on Mechanical Properties of Root Canal Dentine Running title: Final Irrigation on Mechanical Properties. Calcium silicate-based intracanal medication: Physicochemical properties and effectiveness of techniques for removing medication from the human root canal. Increasing the Apical Sizes of Root Enlarged for Root Canal Obturation Influences the Outcome of Single-Root-Canal Teeth Affected by Apical Periodontitis. Regenerative Treatment of Mature Teeth with Pulp Necrosis and Apical Periodontitis Using Biodentine Compared with MTA: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Controversial terminology in root and canal anatomy: A comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1