Can trainability constrain physical fitness adaptations to small-sided games and high-intensity interval training in young male basketball players? a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1491347
LiXin Wei, YaFei Zheng
{"title":"Can trainability constrain physical fitness adaptations to small-sided games and high-intensity interval training in young male basketball players? a prospective cohort study.","authors":"LiXin Wei, YaFei Zheng","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1491347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research on the effects of training programs involving small-sided games (SSG) versus high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been increasing in recent years. However, there is limited understanding of how an individual's initial physical fitness level might influence the extent of adaptations achieved through these programs. This study aimed to compare the impacts of SSG and HIIT on male soccer players, while also considering the players' athleticism, categorized into lower and higher total athleticism score (TSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-week pre-season training period, involving 43 male soccer players from regional-level teams (average age 16.5 ± 0.7 years). Players were evaluated at the start and after the 6-week period. One team incorporated SSG as a core component of their aerobic-based training, while the other team used HIIT. Evaluations included a countermovement jump (CMJ) test, a 30-meter linear sprint test, and the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15 IFT). TSA was calculated to assess each player's overall athleticism level (classifying them as fit and non-fit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that non-fit players showed significantly greater CMJ improvements (mean difference: 3.0 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.005) and VIFT improvements (mean difference: 0.682 km/h; <i>p</i> = 0.002) in SSG compared to fit players. In the HIIT group, non-fit players also revealed greater improvements than fit players in CMJ (mean difference: 2.5 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.005) and peak speed in sprint (mean difference: 0.706 km/h; <i>p</i> = 0.002). No significant differences were found between groups regarding the observed improvements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In conclusion, this study suggests that the initial level of physical fitness significantly influences the magnitude of adaptations. Specifically, players with lower fitness levels appear to benefit more from training interventions. Improvements in CMJ and aerobic capacity in SSG seem to depend on players' fitness levels, and a similar trend is observed in HIIT for CMJ and peak speed. Individualizing training programs is recommended, with a focus on providing greater or different stimuli to more well-prepared players to ensure their continued development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1491347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1491347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research on the effects of training programs involving small-sided games (SSG) versus high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been increasing in recent years. However, there is limited understanding of how an individual's initial physical fitness level might influence the extent of adaptations achieved through these programs. This study aimed to compare the impacts of SSG and HIIT on male soccer players, while also considering the players' athleticism, categorized into lower and higher total athleticism score (TSA).

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-week pre-season training period, involving 43 male soccer players from regional-level teams (average age 16.5 ± 0.7 years). Players were evaluated at the start and after the 6-week period. One team incorporated SSG as a core component of their aerobic-based training, while the other team used HIIT. Evaluations included a countermovement jump (CMJ) test, a 30-meter linear sprint test, and the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15 IFT). TSA was calculated to assess each player's overall athleticism level (classifying them as fit and non-fit).

Results: Results revealed that non-fit players showed significantly greater CMJ improvements (mean difference: 3.0 cm; p < 0.005) and VIFT improvements (mean difference: 0.682 km/h; p = 0.002) in SSG compared to fit players. In the HIIT group, non-fit players also revealed greater improvements than fit players in CMJ (mean difference: 2.5 cm; p < 0.005) and peak speed in sprint (mean difference: 0.706 km/h; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found between groups regarding the observed improvements.

Discussion: In conclusion, this study suggests that the initial level of physical fitness significantly influences the magnitude of adaptations. Specifically, players with lower fitness levels appear to benefit more from training interventions. Improvements in CMJ and aerobic capacity in SSG seem to depend on players' fitness levels, and a similar trend is observed in HIIT for CMJ and peak speed. Individualizing training programs is recommended, with a focus on providing greater or different stimuli to more well-prepared players to ensure their continued development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:近年来,有关小场比赛(SSG)与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)训练计划效果的研究越来越多。然而,人们对个人的初始体能水平如何影响这些训练项目所达到的适应程度的了解还很有限。本研究旨在比较 SSG 和 HIIT 对男性足球运动员的影响,同时考虑运动员的运动能力,将其分为运动能力总分(TSA)较低和较高两类:在为期 6 周的季前训练期间进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,共有 43 名来自地区级球队的男子足球运动员参加(平均年龄为 16.5 ± 0.7 岁)。球员在 6 周训练开始时和结束后接受了评估。其中一支球队将 SSG 作为有氧训练的核心内容,而另一支球队则采用 HIIT 训练。评估包括反向运动跳跃(CMJ)测试、30 米直线冲刺测试和 30-15 间歇体能测试(30-15 IFT)。通过计算 TSA 来评估每位球员的整体运动水平(将他们分为适合和不适合):结果显示,与体能好的球员相比,非体能好的球员在 SSG 中的 CMJ 改善幅度(平均差异:3.0 厘米;p < 0.005)和 VIFT 改善幅度(平均差异:0.682 km/h;p = 0.002)明显更大。在 HIIT 组中,非体能好的球员也比体能好的球员在 CMJ(平均差异:2.5 厘米;p < 0.005)和冲刺峰值速度(平均差异:0.706 公里/小时;p = 0.002)方面有更大的提高。在观察到的改善方面,各组之间没有发现明显差异:总之,本研究表明,初始体能水平对适应能力的影响很大。具体来说,体能水平较低的运动员似乎从训练干预中获益更多。在 SSG 中,CMJ 和有氧能力的提高似乎取决于球员的体能水平,而在 HIIT 中,CMJ 和峰值速度也有类似的趋势。建议制定个性化的训练计划,重点是为准备更充分的球员提供更多或不同的刺激,以确保他们的持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The expression of glycolysis-related proteins in urine significantly increases after running. Molecular pathways involved in the control of contractile and metabolic properties of skeletal muscle fibers as potential therapeutic targets for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Update on NKCC2 regulation in the thick ascending limb (TAL) by membrane trafficking, phosphorylation, and protein-protein interactions. A prospective, self-controlled study of sub-plateau heart rate variability in healthy adults. Effectiveness of a brief multicomponent intervention to improve physical activity level and functional capacity in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome (Synchronize+).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1