Switching to intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides no benefit in couples of poor embryonic development in the previous in vitro fertilization cycle.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2442451
Shuai Liu, Junjie Zhong, Yu Jiang, Lin Wang, Yudi Luo, Bowen Luo, Zengyu Yang
{"title":"Switching to intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides no benefit in couples of poor embryonic development in the previous <i>in vitro</i> fertilization cycle.","authors":"Shuai Liu, Junjie Zhong, Yu Jiang, Lin Wang, Yudi Luo, Bowen Luo, Zengyu Yang","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2442451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of changing the insemination method in women who experienced poor embryonic development during the preceding cycle. A total of 15,886 conventional IVF in 9,311 women, performed between August 2015 and June 2023, were included in this study. Of these, 270 couples experienced IVF failure due to poor embryonic development in the first oocyte retrieval (OR) cycle, which was cancelled before transfer. The patients were stratified based on whether or not they switched to ICSI for subsequent attempts. Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) and a series of secondary outcomes were compared. The embryo utilization, high-quality embryo, blastocyst formation, implantation, cumulative clinical pregnancy, CLBR and miscarriage rates were comparable between the two groups, whereas the fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly lower in the ICSI group during the second OR cycle (60.76% vs. 70.42%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and all OR cycles (60.02% vs. 71.69%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, the CLBRs in the ICSI and IVF groups after up to seven OR cycles were 41.35% and 36.84%, respectively. Most patients achieved live births during the second OR cycle (58.33%, ICSI vs. 62.86%, IVF). ICSI did not improve clinical or embryonic outcomes in women who experienced poor embryonic development in their preceding cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2442451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2442451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of changing the insemination method in women who experienced poor embryonic development during the preceding cycle. A total of 15,886 conventional IVF in 9,311 women, performed between August 2015 and June 2023, were included in this study. Of these, 270 couples experienced IVF failure due to poor embryonic development in the first oocyte retrieval (OR) cycle, which was cancelled before transfer. The patients were stratified based on whether or not they switched to ICSI for subsequent attempts. Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) and a series of secondary outcomes were compared. The embryo utilization, high-quality embryo, blastocyst formation, implantation, cumulative clinical pregnancy, CLBR and miscarriage rates were comparable between the two groups, whereas the fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly lower in the ICSI group during the second OR cycle (60.76% vs. 70.42%, p < 0.001) and all OR cycles (60.02% vs. 71.69%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CLBRs in the ICSI and IVF groups after up to seven OR cycles were 41.35% and 36.84%, respectively. Most patients achieved live births during the second OR cycle (58.33%, ICSI vs. 62.86%, IVF). ICSI did not improve clinical or embryonic outcomes in women who experienced poor embryonic development in their preceding cycle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
期刊最新文献
Do very young oocyte donors negatively impact live birth rates in their recipients? The infected blood inquiry report-lessons for gamete donation. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes. Mpox in assisted conception: should we be worried about this monkey wrench? Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): British Fertility Society policy and practice guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1