Mixed-methods multicenter assessment of healthcare workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to blood culture utilization in hospitalized adults.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.208
Valeria Fabre, Sara E Cosgrove, Aaron M Milstone, Alejandra B Salinas, Kathleen O Degnan, Erin B Gettler, Laurel J Glaser, J Kristie Johnson, Rebekah W Moehring, George E Nelson, Barry Rittmann, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Jonathan H Ryder, Jorge L Salinas, Gregory M Schrank, Thomas T Talbot, Trevor C Van Schooneveld, Anastasia Wasylyshyn, Anping Xie
{"title":"Mixed-methods multicenter assessment of healthcare workers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to blood culture utilization in hospitalized adults.","authors":"Valeria Fabre, Sara E Cosgrove, Aaron M Milstone, Alejandra B Salinas, Kathleen O Degnan, Erin B Gettler, Laurel J Glaser, J Kristie Johnson, Rebekah W Moehring, George E Nelson, Barry Rittmann, Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava, Jonathan H Ryder, Jorge L Salinas, Gregory M Schrank, Thomas T Talbot, Trevor C Van Schooneveld, Anastasia Wasylyshyn, Anping Xie","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand healthcare workers' (HCWs) beliefs and practices toward blood culture (BCx) use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional electronic survey and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic hospitals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>HCWs involved in BCx ordering and collection in adult intensive care units (ICU) and wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered an anonymous electronic survey to HCWs and conducted semi-structured interviews with unit staff and quality improvement (QI) leaders in these institutions to understand their perspectives regarding BCx stewardship between February and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 314 HCWs who responded to the survey, most (67.4%) were physicians and were involved in BCx ordering (82.3%). Most survey respondents reported that clinicians had a low threshold to culture patients for fever (84.4%) and agreed they could safely reduce the number of BCx obtained in their units (65%). However, only half of them believed BCx was overused. Although most made BCx decisions as a team (74.1%), a minority reported these team discussions occurred daily (42.4%). A third of respondents reported not usually collecting the correct volume per BCx bottle, half were unaware of the improved sensitivity of 2 BCx sets, and most were unsure of the nationally recommended BCx contamination threshold (87.5%). Knowledge regarding the utility of BCx for common infections was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCWs' understanding of best collection practices and yield of BCx was limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand healthcare workers' (HCWs) beliefs and practices toward blood culture (BCx) use.

Design: Cross-sectional electronic survey and semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Academic hospitals in the United States.

Participants: HCWs involved in BCx ordering and collection in adult intensive care units (ICU) and wards.

Methods: We administered an anonymous electronic survey to HCWs and conducted semi-structured interviews with unit staff and quality improvement (QI) leaders in these institutions to understand their perspectives regarding BCx stewardship between February and November 2023.

Results: Of 314 HCWs who responded to the survey, most (67.4%) were physicians and were involved in BCx ordering (82.3%). Most survey respondents reported that clinicians had a low threshold to culture patients for fever (84.4%) and agreed they could safely reduce the number of BCx obtained in their units (65%). However, only half of them believed BCx was overused. Although most made BCx decisions as a team (74.1%), a minority reported these team discussions occurred daily (42.4%). A third of respondents reported not usually collecting the correct volume per BCx bottle, half were unaware of the improved sensitivity of 2 BCx sets, and most were unsure of the nationally recommended BCx contamination threshold (87.5%). Knowledge regarding the utility of BCx for common infections was limited.

Conclusions: HCWs' understanding of best collection practices and yield of BCx was limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对住院成人血培养利用相关医护人员的知识、认知和实践的混合方法多中心评估
目的:了解卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对血培养(BCx)使用的信念和做法。设计:横断面电子调查和半结构化访谈。环境:美国的学术医院。参与者:参与成人重症监护病房(ICU)和病房BCx订购和收集的医护人员。方法:我们对卫生保健工作者进行了匿名电子调查,并对这些机构的单位工作人员和质量改进(QI)负责人进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们在2023年2月至11月期间对BCx管理的看法。结果:参与调查的314名卫生保健员中,医生占67.4%,参与BCx点单的占82.3%。大多数调查应答者报告说,临床医生对患者进行发热培养的门槛较低(84.4%),并同意他们可以安全地减少在其单位获得的BCx数量(65%)。然而,只有一半的人认为BCx被过度使用了。尽管大多数人是作为一个团队做出BCx决策(74.1%),但少数人报告说这些团队讨论每天都会发生(42.4%)。三分之一的受访者报告说,通常不收集每瓶BCx的正确体积,一半人不知道2套BCx的灵敏度提高了,大多数人不确定国家推荐的BCx污染阈值(87.5%)。关于BCx治疗常见感染的知识有限。结论:卫生保健工作者对BCx的最佳收集方法和产率的了解有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
期刊最新文献
Exploring AI-assisted cameras to assess use of contact precautions. Antibiotic guideline concordance and area deprivation in the US emergency departments, 2015-2024. Current infection control practices for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO): a survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) research network and affiliated US-based hospitals. Azithromycin use for common acute respiratory infections during a Mycoplasma pneumoniae national surge: results from the SHARPS-OP benchmarking collaborative. Antimicrobial stewardship without borders: a case study in sustainable collaboration between the University of Florida, University of Rwanda and the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1