AttributeRank: An Algorithm for Attribute Ranking in Clinical Variable Selection

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/jep.14257
Donald Douglas Atsa'am, Ruth Wario, Pakiso Khomokhoana
{"title":"AttributeRank: An Algorithm for Attribute Ranking in Clinical Variable Selection","authors":"Donald Douglas Atsa'am,&nbsp;Ruth Wario,&nbsp;Pakiso Khomokhoana","doi":"10.1111/jep.14257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Risk difference is a valuable measure of association in epidemiology and healthcare which has the potential to be used in medical and clinical variable selection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, an attribute ranking algorithm, called AttributeRank, was developed to facilitate variable selection from clinical data sets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The algorithm computes the risk difference between a predictor and the response variable to determine the level of importance of a predictor. The performance of the algorithm was compared with some existing variable selection algorithms using five clinical data sets on neonatal birthweight, bacterial survival after treatment, myocardial infarction, breast cancer, and diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The variable subsets selected by AttributeRank yielded the highest average classification accuracy across the data sets, compared to Fisher score, Pearson's correlation, variable importance function, and Chi-Square.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AttributeRank proved to be more valuable in attribute ranking of clinical data sets compared to the existing algorithms and should be implemented in a user-friendly application in future research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.14257","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Risk difference is a valuable measure of association in epidemiology and healthcare which has the potential to be used in medical and clinical variable selection.

Objective

In this study, an attribute ranking algorithm, called AttributeRank, was developed to facilitate variable selection from clinical data sets.

Methods

The algorithm computes the risk difference between a predictor and the response variable to determine the level of importance of a predictor. The performance of the algorithm was compared with some existing variable selection algorithms using five clinical data sets on neonatal birthweight, bacterial survival after treatment, myocardial infarction, breast cancer, and diabetes.

Results

The variable subsets selected by AttributeRank yielded the highest average classification accuracy across the data sets, compared to Fisher score, Pearson's correlation, variable importance function, and Chi-Square.

Conclusion

AttributeRank proved to be more valuable in attribute ranking of clinical data sets compared to the existing algorithms and should be implemented in a user-friendly application in future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AttributeRank:一种临床变量选择中的属性排序算法。
背景:风险差异是流行病学和卫生保健相关性的一种有价值的测量方法,有可能用于医学和临床变量的选择。目的:在本研究中,开发了一种称为AttributeRank的属性排序算法,以方便从临床数据集中选择变量。方法:该算法计算预测变量与响应变量之间的风险差,以确定预测变量的重要程度。采用新生儿出生体重、治疗后细菌存活率、心肌梗死、乳腺癌和糖尿病5个临床数据集,与现有的一些变量选择算法进行性能比较。结果:与Fisher评分、Pearson相关、变量重要性函数和卡方相比,AttributeRank选择的变量子集在数据集中产生了最高的平均分类精度。结论:与现有算法相比,AttributeRank在临床数据集属性排序方面更有价值,应在未来的研究中以用户友好的方式应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Transition and Life-Long Care for Adults With Cerebral Palsy: A Patient Group ‘Too Hard to Impact!’ Are We Still Sending Young People ‘Off a Cliff’? Systematic Review of Outcome Measures in Pharmacologically Managed Chronic Pain: Informing a New Outcome Framework for Healthcare Provider-Led Pharmacotherapy Services Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Biopsychosocial-Based Exercise Approach in Rheumatic Diseases: A Mixed Methods Research With Patients' Perspectives Issue Information FungiCAP Survey: Insights Into Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Antifungal Prescriptions in Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1