Burnout in Practicing Neurologists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200422
Janet Guo, Senay Gokcebel, Parneet Grewal, Sasha Alick-Lindstrom, Kelly Holder, Mathew J Gregoski, Neishay Ayub
{"title":"Burnout in Practicing Neurologists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Janet Guo, Senay Gokcebel, Parneet Grewal, Sasha Alick-Lindstrom, Kelly Holder, Mathew J Gregoski, Neishay Ayub","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Burnout is a context-dependent, global issue among physicians in the medical field who often face job-related stressors, high workloads, and limited or lack of social support or autonomy. Within medicine, neurology is a specialty with high levels of burnout and low levels of work-life satisfaction. We, therefore, conducted this study to evaluate burnout rates among neurologists globally and identify the tools used to evaluate it.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Among the 14 articles analyzed, the mean burnout prevalence rate among neurologists ranged from 18.1% to 94% (N = 8,735) across 6 countries (the United States, China, Philippines, Spain, Greece, and Brazil). Assessment of burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) revealed that almost two-thirds (65.9%) of neurologists (N = 7,816) report experiencing burnout. Ten studies (71.4%) assessed burnout by using the MBI; the other 4 studies used the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, a survey questionnaire generated by the American Academy of Neurology Stroke Practice Resources Workgroup, the Mini-Z survey, and a single question from the Physician Work Life Study. Among the 5 studies that used the same tool for measuring burnout (22-item MBI) and burnout criteria cutoff (emotional exhaustion [EE] ≥ 27 and/or depersonalization (DP) ≥ 10 subscale), the mean burnout rate ranged from 45% to 67% (<i>p</i> < 0.05, N = 7,816) across 3 countries (China, the United States, and Brazil). Of the studies that used the MBI and reported the 3 subscales of EE, DP, and personal accomplishment (PA), only the mean EE score was statistically different between studies. There were no significant differences detected in burnout rates among residents, among attending physicians, or residents compared with attendings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This meta-analysis of burnout among practicing neurologists reveals that available published data span different levels of training, different sample sizes, and different survey tools with different cutoffs used for burnout within the same tool. Although burnout rates among neurologists were found to differ by country, it is evident from this systematic review that a great deal of neurology physicians are experiencing burnout across the globe. This systematic review may inform future approaches to reduce burnout among neurologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e200422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Burnout is a context-dependent, global issue among physicians in the medical field who often face job-related stressors, high workloads, and limited or lack of social support or autonomy. Within medicine, neurology is a specialty with high levels of burnout and low levels of work-life satisfaction. We, therefore, conducted this study to evaluate burnout rates among neurologists globally and identify the tools used to evaluate it.

Recent findings: Among the 14 articles analyzed, the mean burnout prevalence rate among neurologists ranged from 18.1% to 94% (N = 8,735) across 6 countries (the United States, China, Philippines, Spain, Greece, and Brazil). Assessment of burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) revealed that almost two-thirds (65.9%) of neurologists (N = 7,816) report experiencing burnout. Ten studies (71.4%) assessed burnout by using the MBI; the other 4 studies used the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, a survey questionnaire generated by the American Academy of Neurology Stroke Practice Resources Workgroup, the Mini-Z survey, and a single question from the Physician Work Life Study. Among the 5 studies that used the same tool for measuring burnout (22-item MBI) and burnout criteria cutoff (emotional exhaustion [EE] ≥ 27 and/or depersonalization (DP) ≥ 10 subscale), the mean burnout rate ranged from 45% to 67% (p < 0.05, N = 7,816) across 3 countries (China, the United States, and Brazil). Of the studies that used the MBI and reported the 3 subscales of EE, DP, and personal accomplishment (PA), only the mean EE score was statistically different between studies. There were no significant differences detected in burnout rates among residents, among attending physicians, or residents compared with attendings.

Summary: This meta-analysis of burnout among practicing neurologists reveals that available published data span different levels of training, different sample sizes, and different survey tools with different cutoffs used for burnout within the same tool. Although burnout rates among neurologists were found to differ by country, it is evident from this systematic review that a great deal of neurology physicians are experiencing burnout across the globe. This systematic review may inform future approaches to reduce burnout among neurologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执业神经科医生的职业倦怠:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
综述目的:职业倦怠是医学领域医生面临的一个情境依赖的全球性问题,他们经常面临与工作相关的压力源、高工作量和有限或缺乏社会支持或自主权。在医学领域,神经学是一个职业倦怠程度高、工作生活满意度低的专业。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以评估全球神经科医生的职业倦怠率,并确定用于评估的工具。最近的发现:在分析的14篇文章中,6个国家(美国、中国、菲律宾、西班牙、希腊和巴西)的神经科医生的平均倦怠患病率从18.1%到94% (N = 8735)不等。使用Maslach职业倦怠量表(MBI)进行的职业倦怠评估显示,近三分之二(65.9%)的神经科医生(N = 7,816)报告经历过职业倦怠。10项研究(71.4%)使用MBI评估倦怠;另外4项研究使用了哥本哈根倦怠量表,一份由美国神经病学学会中风实践资源工作组生成的调查问卷,Mini-Z调查,以及医生工作生活研究中的一个问题。在使用相同工具测量倦怠(22项MBI)和倦怠标准截止值(情绪耗竭[EE]≥27和/或人格解体(DP)≥10个子量表)的5项研究中,中国、美国和巴西3个国家的平均倦怠率为45%至67% (p < 0.05, N = 7,816)。在使用MBI并报告了情感表达、DP和个人成就(PA)三个子量表的研究中,只有情感表达的平均得分在研究之间有统计学差异。住院医师、主治医师、住院医师与主治医师之间的倦怠率无显著差异。摘要:这项对执业神经科医生职业倦怠的荟萃分析显示,现有的公开数据涵盖了不同的培训水平、不同的样本量和不同的调查工具,在同一工具中使用了不同的职业倦怠截止值。尽管神经科医生的职业倦怠率因国家而异,但从这一系统综述中可以明显看出,全球有大量神经科医生正在经历职业倦怠。这一系统综述可能会为未来减少神经科医生职业倦怠的方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Brain Emergency Management Initiative (BEMI-S): Assessment of Embolectomy Transfer Times Using a Novel Stroke System Transfer Protocol. Sustaining Progress in Reducing Door-In-Door-Out Times for Stroke Transfers. Albendazole-Praziquantel Dual Therapy Compared With Albendazole Monotherapy in Neurocysticercosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Advancing Early Detection of Alzheimer Disease in the Primary Care Setting in the United States. Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome: A Practical Overview for the General Neurologist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1