{"title":"Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) - Pathologia, quo vadis? - A global survey.","authors":"Kristijan Skok, Konstantin Bräutigam","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms (\"X\" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"266 ","pages":"155775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2024.155775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms ("X" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.
期刊介绍:
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.