Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678
Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Y Killien, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan
{"title":"Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017.","authors":"Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Y Killien, R Scott Watson, Leslie A Dervan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between family presence at the PICU bedside and daily positive delirium screening scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary children's hospital PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Children younger than 18 years old with PICU length of stay greater than 36 hours enrolled in the Seattle Children's Hospital Outcomes Assessment Program from 2014 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In the dataset, delirium screening had been performed bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, with scores greater than or equal to 9 classified as positive. Family presence was documented every 2 hours. Among 224 patients, 55% (n = 124/224) had positive delirium screening on 44% (n = 408/930) of PICU days. Family presence at the bedside during PICU stay (< 90% compared with ≥ 90%) was associated with higher proportion of ever (as opposed to never) being screened positive for delirium (26/37 vs. 98/187; difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%]; p = 0.046). On univariate analysis, each additional decile of increasing family presence was associated with lower odds of positive delirium screening on the same day (odds ratio [OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]) and subsequent day (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]). On multivariable analysis after adjustments, including baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), higher family presence was associated with lower odds of subsequent-day positive delirium screening (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]). Among patients with PCPC less than or equal to 2, each additional decile of increasing family presence was independently associated with lower odds of both same-day (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]) and subsequent-day (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]) positive delirium screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our 2014-2017 retrospective cohort, greater family presence was associated with lower odds of delirium in PICU patients. Family presence is a modifiable factor that may mitigate the burden of pediatric delirium, and future studies should explore barriers and facilitators of family presence in the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the association between family presence at the PICU bedside and daily positive delirium screening scores.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary children's hospital PICU.

Subjects: Children younger than 18 years old with PICU length of stay greater than 36 hours enrolled in the Seattle Children's Hospital Outcomes Assessment Program from 2014 to 2017.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: In the dataset, delirium screening had been performed bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium, with scores greater than or equal to 9 classified as positive. Family presence was documented every 2 hours. Among 224 patients, 55% (n = 124/224) had positive delirium screening on 44% (n = 408/930) of PICU days. Family presence at the bedside during PICU stay (< 90% compared with ≥ 90%) was associated with higher proportion of ever (as opposed to never) being screened positive for delirium (26/37 vs. 98/187; difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 0.4-32.1%]; p = 0.046). On univariate analysis, each additional decile of increasing family presence was associated with lower odds of positive delirium screening on the same day (odds ratio [OR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]) and subsequent day (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.94]). On multivariable analysis after adjustments, including baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), higher family presence was associated with lower odds of subsequent-day positive delirium screening (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]). Among patients with PCPC less than or equal to 2, each additional decile of increasing family presence was independently associated with lower odds of both same-day (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]) and subsequent-day (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]) positive delirium screening.

Conclusions: In our 2014-2017 retrospective cohort, greater family presence was associated with lower odds of delirium in PICU patients. Family presence is a modifiable factor that may mitigate the burden of pediatric delirium, and future studies should explore barriers and facilitators of family presence in the PICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PICU 病床旁的家属与儿科患者谵妄:2014-2017年单中心队列回顾性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Antithrombin and Activated Protein C in Pediatric Sepsis: Prospective Observational Study of Outcome. Family Presence at the PICU Bedside and Pediatric Patient Delirium: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort, 2014-2017. Planning a Phased Guideline Implementation Strategy Across the Multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) Collaborative. The Pediatric Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP): Statistical Methods Planned in the Bayesian, Adaptive, Duration Finding Trial. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insight From a Cardiovascular Simulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1