Investigation of Abdominoplasty Without General Anesthesia: A Scoping Review.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1177/22925503241301711
Ted Zhou, Madeline E Hubbard, Nasimul S Huq
{"title":"Investigation of Abdominoplasty Without General Anesthesia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ted Zhou, Madeline E Hubbard, Nasimul S Huq","doi":"10.1177/22925503241301711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Abdominoplasty is a common aesthetic surgical procedure primarily performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is aerosol-generating and involves extended immobilization associated with systemic complications like venous thromboembolisms (VTEs). There is increasing interest in performing abdominoplasties without GA because of potential lower complication rates and shorter postoperative recovery time. This review sought to summarize all available literature on the safety and outcomes of abdominoplasty performed without GA. <b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted with no date limits in October 2023 encompassing Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The type of anesthesia was separated into 3 categories: conscious or intravenous (IV) sedation, regional anesthetic blocks (RAB: spinal and epidural), and local anesthesia (direct local infiltration and field blocks). <b>Results:</b> A total of 28 studies were included. Safety data was reported for abdominoplasty alone (<i>n</i> = 6), with liposuction (<i>n</i> = 14), or both (<i>n</i> = 1). The employed anesthesia methods were IV and local (<i>n</i> = 13), RAB and local (<i>n</i> = 3), IV and RAB (<i>n</i> = 2), IV and RAB and local (<i>n</i> = 2), and IV only (<i>n</i> = 1). A total of 48 379 patients were identified, with 30 cases of VTEs reported. Two studies reported GA conversion rates between 4.8% and 6.0%. A total of 11 studies assessed abdominoplasty outcomes, highlighting high patient satisfaction and low postoperative pain. The majority of analyzed studies had a \"high\" or \"critical\" risk of bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our review provides preliminary evidence that performing abdominoplasty without GA is safe and feasible. Additional high-quality studies are necessary to further validate our findings and to develop a standardized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503241301711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503241301711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominoplasty is a common aesthetic surgical procedure primarily performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is aerosol-generating and involves extended immobilization associated with systemic complications like venous thromboembolisms (VTEs). There is increasing interest in performing abdominoplasties without GA because of potential lower complication rates and shorter postoperative recovery time. This review sought to summarize all available literature on the safety and outcomes of abdominoplasty performed without GA. Methods: A scoping review was conducted with no date limits in October 2023 encompassing Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The type of anesthesia was separated into 3 categories: conscious or intravenous (IV) sedation, regional anesthetic blocks (RAB: spinal and epidural), and local anesthesia (direct local infiltration and field blocks). Results: A total of 28 studies were included. Safety data was reported for abdominoplasty alone (n = 6), with liposuction (n = 14), or both (n = 1). The employed anesthesia methods were IV and local (n = 13), RAB and local (n = 3), IV and RAB (n = 2), IV and RAB and local (n = 2), and IV only (n = 1). A total of 48 379 patients were identified, with 30 cases of VTEs reported. Two studies reported GA conversion rates between 4.8% and 6.0%. A total of 11 studies assessed abdominoplasty outcomes, highlighting high patient satisfaction and low postoperative pain. The majority of analyzed studies had a "high" or "critical" risk of bias. Conclusion: Our review provides preliminary evidence that performing abdominoplasty without GA is safe and feasible. Additional high-quality studies are necessary to further validate our findings and to develop a standardized approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无全身麻醉的腹部整形手术调查:范围审查。
简介:腹部成形术是一种常见的美容手术,主要在全身麻醉(GA)下进行。然而,GA会产生气溶胶,并涉及与全身并发症(如静脉血栓栓塞(vte))相关的长期固定。由于潜在的较低的并发症发生率和较短的术后恢复时间,越来越多的人对不使用GA的腹部整形手术感兴趣。本综述旨在总结所有关于无GA的腹部成形术的安全性和结果的文献。方法:在2023年10月进行了一项无日期限制的范围综述,包括Medline、Embase、Web of Science和CINAHL。麻醉类型分为3类:意识或静脉(IV)镇静、区域麻醉阻滞(RAB:脊髓和硬膜外)和局部麻醉(直接局部浸润和场阻滞)。结果:共纳入28项研究。报告了单独腹部成形术(n = 6)、联合吸脂术(n = 14)或两者同时进行(n = 1)的安全性数据。采用静脉注射加局部麻醉(n = 13)、RAB加局部麻醉(n = 3)、静脉注射加RAB麻醉(n = 2)、静脉注射加RAB加局部麻醉(n = 2)、单纯静脉注射麻醉(n = 1)。共发现48379例患者,其中30例为静脉血栓栓塞。两项研究报告GA转化率在4.8%至6.0%之间。共有11项研究评估了腹部成形术的结果,强调了高患者满意度和低术后疼痛。大多数被分析的研究具有“高”或“严重”的偏倚风险。结论:我们的综述提供了初步证据,证明不使用GA的腹部成形术是安全可行的。需要更多的高质量研究来进一步验证我们的发现并制定标准化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
A 5-Year Analysis of Saudi Arabian Applications to Plastic Surgery Residency Training in Canada. Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Following Vaginoplasty in Transgender Females: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada. Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review. Long-Term Opioid Use After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Incidence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1