Morten Borg, Rikke Ibsen, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke
{"title":"Real-Life Nationwide Outcomes of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Endobronchial Valves in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Morten Borg, Rikke Ibsen, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke","doi":"10.1159/000543010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally, characterized by airflow limitation and lung hyperinflation due to emphysema. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves offers a minimally invasive treatment option for emphysema, aiming to reduce lung hyperinflation, thereby improving lung function and exercise tolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of BLVR in a real-life nationwide setting using comprehensive Danish registries. The study population included patients who underwent BLVR between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021. We assessed clinical outcomes, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score, and the rates of exacerbations and pneumonia before and after the procedure. A control cohort of matched COPD patients was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following BLVR, a significant increase in FEV1, similar to the improvements reported in randomized controlled trials, was observed. Additionally, the proportion of patients classified as GOLD stage IV decreased from 71.3% to 60.6% after BLVR. The incidence rate ratio for severe exacerbations significantly dropped to 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.67, p < 0.01) after BLVR. No significant changes were observed in the rates of moderate and severe pneumonia, and mortality rates did not differ significantly from those in the matched control cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the real-life efficacy of BLVR using endobronchial valves, highlighting a significant improvement in FEV1 and a reduction in severe COPD exacerbations. The procedure did not increase pneumonia rates or affect mortality, supporting continued use of BLVR for managing patients with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally, characterized by airflow limitation and lung hyperinflation due to emphysema. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves offers a minimally invasive treatment option for emphysema, aiming to reduce lung hyperinflation, thereby improving lung function and exercise tolerance.
Methods: This study evaluated the efficacy of BLVR in a real-life nationwide setting using comprehensive Danish registries. The study population included patients who underwent BLVR between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021. We assessed clinical outcomes, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score, and the rates of exacerbations and pneumonia before and after the procedure. A control cohort of matched COPD patients was also analyzed.
Results: Following BLVR, a significant increase in FEV1, similar to the improvements reported in randomized controlled trials, was observed. Additionally, the proportion of patients classified as GOLD stage IV decreased from 71.3% to 60.6% after BLVR. The incidence rate ratio for severe exacerbations significantly dropped to 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.67, p < 0.01) after BLVR. No significant changes were observed in the rates of moderate and severe pneumonia, and mortality rates did not differ significantly from those in the matched control cohort.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the real-life efficacy of BLVR using endobronchial valves, highlighting a significant improvement in FEV1 and a reduction in severe COPD exacerbations. The procedure did not increase pneumonia rates or affect mortality, supporting continued use of BLVR for managing patients with COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球第三大死亡原因,其特征是肺气肿引起的气流限制和肺部恶性膨胀。支气管镜下支气管内瓣膜肺减容术(BLVR)为肺气肿提供了一种微创治疗选择,旨在减少肺部恶性膨胀,从而改善肺功能和运动耐受性。方法:本研究评估了BLVR在丹麦全国范围内的实际应用效果。研究人群包括2013年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间接受BLVR的患者。我们评估了临床结果,包括1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难评分、手术前后恶化和肺炎的发生率。还分析了一组匹配的COPD患者的对照队列。结果:BLVR后,观察到FEV1显著增加,与随机对照试验报告的改善相似。此外,BLVR后归类为GOLD IV期的患者比例从71.3%下降到60.6%。严重急性加重发生率显著下降至0.56 (95% CI 0.47-0.67)。结论:本研究证实了支气管内瓣膜BLVR的现实疗效,突出了FEV1的显著改善和COPD严重急性加重的减少。该手术没有增加肺炎发病率或影响死亡率,支持继续使用BLVR治疗COPD患者。
期刊介绍:
''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.