Navigating Illumina DNA methylation data: biology versus technical artefacts.

Abstract

Illumina-based BeadChip arrays have revolutionized genome-wide DNA methylation profiling, pushing it into diagnostics. However, comprehensive quality assessment remains challenging within a wide range of available tissue materials and sample preparation methods. This study tackles two critical issues: differentiating between biological effects and technical artefacts in suboptimal quality samples and the impact of the first sample on the Illumina-like normalization algorithm. We introduce three quality control scores based on global DNA methylation distribution (DB-Score), bin distance from copy number variation analysis (BIN-Score) and consistently methylated CpGs (CM-Score) that rely on biological features rather than internal array controls. These scores, designed to be adjustable for different analysis tools and sample cohort characteristics, were explored and benchmarked across independent cohorts. Additionally, we reveal deviations in beta values caused by different sample rankings with the Illumina-like normalization algorithm, verified these with whole-genome methylation sequencing data and showed effects on differential DNA methylation analysis. Our findings underscore the necessity of consistently utilizing a pre-defined normalization sample within the ranking process to boost reproducibility of the Illumina-like normalization algorithm. Overall, our study delivers valuable insights, practical recommendations and R functions designed to enhance reproducibility and quality assurance of DNA methylation analysis, particularly for challenging sample types.