Updated Structure of CNBP Repeat Expansions in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 and Its Implication for Standard Diagnostics.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology-Genetics Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1212/NXG.0000000000200220
Martin Wendlandt, Hannes Erdmann, Simone Rost, Morghan C Lucas, Kerstin Becker, Stephanie Kleinle, Manuela Timmer, Andrea Bier, Gilbert Wunderlich, Stephan Wenninger, Maggie C Walter, Teresa Neuhann, Benedikt Schoser, Elke Holinski-Feder, Angela Abicht
{"title":"Updated Structure of <i>CNBP</i> Repeat Expansions in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 and Its Implication for Standard Diagnostics.","authors":"Martin Wendlandt, Hannes Erdmann, Simone Rost, Morghan C Lucas, Kerstin Becker, Stephanie Kleinle, Manuela Timmer, Andrea Bier, Gilbert Wunderlich, Stephan Wenninger, Maggie C Walter, Teresa Neuhann, Benedikt Schoser, Elke Holinski-Feder, Angela Abicht","doi":"10.1212/NXG.0000000000200220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a multisystemic repeat disorder caused by the expansion of an unstable CCTG tetranucleotide repeat in the noncoding region of the <i>CNBP</i> gene. Standard diagnostic is based on Southern blot analysis or a unidirectional RP-PCR that amplifies the repeat from the downstream end.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study reevaluated 80 patients (cohort 1) with clinical suspicion of DM2 but homozygous negative results using the standard diagnostic repeat-primed PCR (RP-PCR). Reanalysis was performed using a second RP-PCR that amplifies the repeat from the opposite direction. Individual samples were further analyzed by Oxford Nanopore Technology long-read sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and another RP-PCR. In addition, repeat expansions were further characterized in 168 patients with confirmed DM2 (cohort 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5 of the 80 patients (cohort 1) with expanded repeats in <i>CNBP</i> and, as such, reclassified them as positive for DM2. The initial false-negative results were attributed to variants within the primer binding site of the standard RP-PCR in one patient and an additional novel (TCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat downstream to the known (CCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat in 4 other patients. By analyzing a cohort of 168 patients with confirmed DM2 (cohort 2), we found that the additional (TCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat is present in at least 84% of patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study revealed the presence of an additional repeat (TCTG)<sub>n</sub> in most of the patients living with DM2. Large expansions of this repeat likely hinder sufficient amplification of the disease causing (CCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat. Because the (TCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat is likely mosaic in length, (CCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat expansions are correctly detected in most patients. However, a few patients are at risk of a false-negative result using the standard RP-PCR, which had a false-negative rate of 0.7% (5/674) and a sensitivity of 97.3% in the cohort studied. Based on our findings, we propose (TG)<sub>v</sub>(TCTG)<sub>w</sub>(CCTG)<sub>n</sub>(TCTG')<sub>m</sub> as the updated model for the structure of <i>CNBP</i> repeat expansions and recommend adapting the diagnostic guidelines accordingly. The effect of the (TCTG)<sub>n</sub> repeat on the phenotype remains to be determined but could be key for establishing a phenotype-genotype correlation for DM2 that remained elusive so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":48613,"journal":{"name":"Neurology-Genetics","volume":"11 1","pages":"e200220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.0000000000200220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a multisystemic repeat disorder caused by the expansion of an unstable CCTG tetranucleotide repeat in the noncoding region of the CNBP gene. Standard diagnostic is based on Southern blot analysis or a unidirectional RP-PCR that amplifies the repeat from the downstream end.

Methods: Our study reevaluated 80 patients (cohort 1) with clinical suspicion of DM2 but homozygous negative results using the standard diagnostic repeat-primed PCR (RP-PCR). Reanalysis was performed using a second RP-PCR that amplifies the repeat from the opposite direction. Individual samples were further analyzed by Oxford Nanopore Technology long-read sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and another RP-PCR. In addition, repeat expansions were further characterized in 168 patients with confirmed DM2 (cohort 2).

Results: We identified 5 of the 80 patients (cohort 1) with expanded repeats in CNBP and, as such, reclassified them as positive for DM2. The initial false-negative results were attributed to variants within the primer binding site of the standard RP-PCR in one patient and an additional novel (TCTG)n repeat downstream to the known (CCTG)n repeat in 4 other patients. By analyzing a cohort of 168 patients with confirmed DM2 (cohort 2), we found that the additional (TCTG)n repeat is present in at least 84% of patients.

Discussion: Our study revealed the presence of an additional repeat (TCTG)n in most of the patients living with DM2. Large expansions of this repeat likely hinder sufficient amplification of the disease causing (CCTG)n repeat. Because the (TCTG)n repeat is likely mosaic in length, (CCTG)n repeat expansions are correctly detected in most patients. However, a few patients are at risk of a false-negative result using the standard RP-PCR, which had a false-negative rate of 0.7% (5/674) and a sensitivity of 97.3% in the cohort studied. Based on our findings, we propose (TG)v(TCTG)w(CCTG)n(TCTG')m as the updated model for the structure of CNBP repeat expansions and recommend adapting the diagnostic guidelines accordingly. The effect of the (TCTG)n repeat on the phenotype remains to be determined but could be key for establishing a phenotype-genotype correlation for DM2 that remained elusive so far.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology-Genetics
Neurology-Genetics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology: Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. Original articles in all areas of neurogenetics will be published including rare and common genetic variation, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease-genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. This will include studies reporting on genetic disease risk and pharmacogenomics. In addition, Neurology: Genetics will publish results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology: Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials are welcome, including well-powered studies reporting negative results.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Exploration of CACNA1A-Related Hemiplegic Migraine in Children Using Electronic Medical Records. Clinical Heterogeneity of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 13: A Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature. Updated Structure of CNBP Repeat Expansions in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 and Its Implication for Standard Diagnostics. Severe Adult-Onset Non-Dystrophic Myotonia With Apnea and Laryngospasm Due to Digenic Inheritance of SCN4A and CLCN1 Variants: A Case Report. The Persistence of Duchenne vs Becker Muscular Dystrophies: Vive la Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1