Comparison of Adaptive and Nonadaptive Gap Detection in Noise Test in Typically Developing Children and Adults.

IF 1 4区医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791211

Sangamanatha Ankmnal Veeranna, Lyerly Christensen, Jennifer Candace-Ann Chapman

{"title":"Comparison of Adaptive and Nonadaptive Gap Detection in Noise Test in Typically Developing Children and Adults.","authors":"Sangamanatha Ankmnal Veeranna, Lyerly Christensen, Jennifer Candace-Ann Chapman","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine whether the gap detection thresholds (GDT) obtained are similar between an adaptive and nonadaptive procedure in children and adults.Study design: Standard group comparison.Study sample: Eighteen typically developing children and 20 young adults with hearing thresholds of 25 dB HL or lower participated in this study.Methods: Forced choice (FC) adaptive GDTs were obtained using psychoacoustic software, and nonadaptive GDTs were obtained using a clinically available gap in noise (GIN) test.Results: Both children and adults showed significantly lower GDTs for the FC adaptive procedure when compared with thresholds obtained using the nonadaptive GIN test. GDTs were less variable for FC adaptive procedure when compared with the nonadaptive procedure.Conclusion: Lower and less variable GDTs can be obtained from children and adults using an FC adaptive procedure.","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"172-177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine whether the gap detection thresholds (GDT) obtained are similar between an adaptive and nonadaptive procedure in children and adults.

Study design: Standard group comparison.

Study sample: Eighteen typically developing children and 20 young adults with hearing thresholds of 25 dB HL or lower participated in this study.

Methods: Forced choice (FC) adaptive GDTs were obtained using psychoacoustic software, and nonadaptive GDTs were obtained using a clinically available gap in noise (GIN) test.

Results: Both children and adults showed significantly lower GDTs for the FC adaptive procedure when compared with thresholds obtained using the nonadaptive GIN test. GDTs were less variable for FC adaptive procedure when compared with the nonadaptive procedure.

Conclusion: Lower and less variable GDTs can be obtained from children and adults using an FC adaptive procedure.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

典型发育儿童与成人噪声测试中自适应与非自适应间隙检测的比较。

目的：本研究的目的是检验儿童和成人在适应性和非适应性过程中获得的间隙检测阈值（GDT）是否相似。研究设计：标准组比较。研究样本：18名正常发育的儿童和20名听力阈值为25 dB HL或更低的年轻人参加了本研究。方法：采用心理声学软件获得强迫选择（FC）自适应GDTs，采用临床可用的噪声间隙（GIN）测试获得非自适应GDTs。结果：与使用非适应性GIN测试获得的阈值相比，儿童和成人的FC适应性过程的GDTs均显着降低。与非自适应过程相比，FC自适应过程的GDTs变化较小。结论：使用FC自适应程序可以从儿童和成人获得较低和较少可变的GDTs。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.