Corrigendum correcting the brief report ‘The influence of preschool IQ on the individual-order stability of intelligence into adulthood’

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/apa.17558
{"title":"Corrigendum correcting the brief report ‘The influence of preschool IQ on the individual-order stability of intelligence into adulthood’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/apa.17558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has come to our attention that there is an error in the second paragraph of our published brief report.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Specifically, we previously stated that ‘158 infants born preterm (&lt;37 weeks of gestation; 30 infants died as neonates) and 100 term-born peers (≥37 weeks) were enrolled at birth’. The correct numbers are ‘159 infants were born preterm (&lt;37 weeks of gestation; 30 infants died as neonates), and 99 were born at term (≥37 weeks)’. We confirm that this error did not affect the results presented in the brief report.</p><p>The error pertains to one infant who was incorrectly categorised as term-born when, in fact, they were born preterm. This infant had died as a neonate and therefore was not included in the analytic sample of this brief report, as IQ data were never assessed.</p><p>Further, Table S2 contains descriptive information on the gestational age of preterm infants. In the process of digitising the data of the Zurich Longitudinal Studies (see ref.<span><sup>2</sup></span> for details), it became evident that gestational age was recorded differently across individuals—either as anamnestic information or as the physician's clinical impression. We have now standardised this data to consistently reflect the anamnestic information for all infants. This adjustment resulted in minimal changes to the descriptive information presented in Table S2. We confirm that these changes did not affect the results presented in the brief report.</p><p>The online version of the article has been corrected accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"114 3","pages":"674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apa.17558","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.17558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has come to our attention that there is an error in the second paragraph of our published brief report.1 Specifically, we previously stated that ‘158 infants born preterm (<37 weeks of gestation; 30 infants died as neonates) and 100 term-born peers (≥37 weeks) were enrolled at birth’. The correct numbers are ‘159 infants were born preterm (<37 weeks of gestation; 30 infants died as neonates), and 99 were born at term (≥37 weeks)’. We confirm that this error did not affect the results presented in the brief report.

The error pertains to one infant who was incorrectly categorised as term-born when, in fact, they were born preterm. This infant had died as a neonate and therefore was not included in the analytic sample of this brief report, as IQ data were never assessed.

Further, Table S2 contains descriptive information on the gestational age of preterm infants. In the process of digitising the data of the Zurich Longitudinal Studies (see ref.2 for details), it became evident that gestational age was recorded differently across individuals—either as anamnestic information or as the physician's clinical impression. We have now standardised this data to consistently reflect the anamnestic information for all infants. This adjustment resulted in minimal changes to the descriptive information presented in Table S2. We confirm that these changes did not affect the results presented in the brief report.

The online version of the article has been corrected accordingly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对“学前智商对成年后智力个体秩序稳定性的影响”简短报告的更正。
我们注意到我们发表的简要报告的第二段有一个错误具体来说,我们之前指出,158名早产婴儿(妊娠37周;30例新生儿死亡)和100例足月同龄人(≥37周)在出生时被纳入研究。正确的数字是159名婴儿早产(妊娠37周;30例新生儿死亡),99例足月出生(≥37周)。我们确认这一错误没有影响简要报告中提出的结果。这个错误涉及一个婴儿,他被错误地归类为足月出生,而事实上,他们是早产的。这名婴儿在刚出生时就已经死亡,因此不包括在本简短报告的分析样本中,因为智商数据从未被评估过。此外,表S2包含有关早产儿胎龄的描述性信息。在对苏黎世纵向研究的数据进行数字化的过程中(详见参考文献2),很明显,不同个体的胎龄记录是不同的——要么是作为记忆信息,要么是作为医生的临床印象。我们现在对这些数据进行了标准化,以一致地反映所有婴儿的遗忘信息。这一调整对表S2中的描述性信息进行了最小的修改。我们确认,这些变化并不影响简要报告中提出的结果。该文章的在线版本已进行了相应的更正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Paediatric Primary Care Across Europe: A Survey of 42 Countries. The Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Biosimilars in Retinopathy of Prematurity. Regulatory Problems in Infancy: Prevalence and Association With Early Neurodevelopmental and Medical Conditions in Toddlers. Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Psychological Aggression Toward Children in Bangladesh Based on Nationally Representative Data. Behavioural and Emotional Symptoms Did not Increase During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Swedish Preschool Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1