A technology-enabled collaborative learning model (Project ECHO) to upskill primary care providers in best practice pain care.

Simone De Morgan, Pippy Walker, Fiona M Blyth, Anne Daly, Anne L J Burke, Michael K Nicholas
{"title":"A technology-enabled collaborative learning model (Project ECHO) to upskill primary care providers in best practice pain care.","authors":"Simone De Morgan, Pippy Walker, Fiona M Blyth, Anne Daly, Anne L J Burke, Michael K Nicholas","doi":"10.1071/PY24035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The South Australian (SA) Chronic Pain Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Network was established to upskill primary care providers in best practice pain care aligned to a patient-centred, biopsychosocial approach using didactic and case-based virtual mentoring sessions. The aims of this study were to assess: (a) participation, satisfaction (relevance, satisfaction with format and content, perceptions of the mentorship environment), learning (perceived knowledge gain, change in attitudes), competence (self-confidence) and performance (intention to change practice, perceived practice change) of the ECHO Network clinician participants; and (b) self-perceived barriers at the clinical, service and system level to applying the learnings. Methods A mixed methods, participatory evaluation approach was undertaken. Data sources included analysis of program records (learning needs assessment, enrolment survey data, program participation data and online surveys of healthcare professionals including a satisfaction survey after each ECHO session (n=106 across the ECHO series of 10 sessions; average response rate=46%), a case presenters survey (n=7, response rate=78%) and an outcome survey after all 10 ECHO sessions (n=11, response rate=25%). Results Forty-four healthcare professionals participated in the ECHO Network from a range of career stages and professional disciplines (half were general practitioners). One-third of participants practised in regional SA. Participants reported that the ECHO sessions met their learning needs (average=99% across the series), were relevant to practice (average=99% across the series), enabled them to learn about the multidisciplinary and biopsychosocial approach to pain care (a verage=97% across the series) and provided positive mentorship (average=96% across the series). Key learnings for participants were the importance of validating the patient experience and incorporating psychological and social approaches into pain care. More than one-third of participants (average=42% across the series) identified barriers to applying the learnings such as limited time during a consultation and difficulty in forming a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions The ECHO Network model was found to be an acceptable and effective interdisciplinary education model for upskilling primary care providers in best practice pain care aligned to a patient-centred, biopsychosocial approach to pain managment. However, participants perceived barriers to translating this knowledge into practice at the clinical, service and system levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The South Australian (SA) Chronic Pain Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Network was established to upskill primary care providers in best practice pain care aligned to a patient-centred, biopsychosocial approach using didactic and case-based virtual mentoring sessions. The aims of this study were to assess: (a) participation, satisfaction (relevance, satisfaction with format and content, perceptions of the mentorship environment), learning (perceived knowledge gain, change in attitudes), competence (self-confidence) and performance (intention to change practice, perceived practice change) of the ECHO Network clinician participants; and (b) self-perceived barriers at the clinical, service and system level to applying the learnings. Methods A mixed methods, participatory evaluation approach was undertaken. Data sources included analysis of program records (learning needs assessment, enrolment survey data, program participation data and online surveys of healthcare professionals including a satisfaction survey after each ECHO session (n=106 across the ECHO series of 10 sessions; average response rate=46%), a case presenters survey (n=7, response rate=78%) and an outcome survey after all 10 ECHO sessions (n=11, response rate=25%). Results Forty-four healthcare professionals participated in the ECHO Network from a range of career stages and professional disciplines (half were general practitioners). One-third of participants practised in regional SA. Participants reported that the ECHO sessions met their learning needs (average=99% across the series), were relevant to practice (average=99% across the series), enabled them to learn about the multidisciplinary and biopsychosocial approach to pain care (a verage=97% across the series) and provided positive mentorship (average=96% across the series). Key learnings for participants were the importance of validating the patient experience and incorporating psychological and social approaches into pain care. More than one-third of participants (average=42% across the series) identified barriers to applying the learnings such as limited time during a consultation and difficulty in forming a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions The ECHO Network model was found to be an acceptable and effective interdisciplinary education model for upskilling primary care providers in best practice pain care aligned to a patient-centred, biopsychosocial approach to pain managment. However, participants perceived barriers to translating this knowledge into practice at the clinical, service and system levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个技术支持的协作学习模式(项目ECHO),以提高初级保健提供者在最佳实践疼痛护理技能。
背景 南澳大利亚州(SA)慢性疼痛社区医疗保健成果推广网络(ECHO)的建立是为了提高初级医疗服务提供者的疼痛护理最佳实践能力,该网络采用以患者为中心的生物-心理-社会方法,通过授课和基于案例的虚拟指导课程来实现。本研究的目的是评估:(a) ECHO 网络临床医生参与者的参与度、满意度(相关性、对形式和内容的满意度、对指导环境的看法)、学习(感知到的知识收获、态度的改变)、能力(自信心)和表现(改变实践的意愿、感知到的实践改变);以及 (b) 临床、服务和系统层面应用所学知识的自我感觉障碍。方法 采用混合方法、参与式评估方法。数据来源包括对项目记录的分析(学习需求评估、报名调查数据、项目参与数据以及对医护专业人员的在线调查,其中包括每期 ECHO 课程后的满意度调查(ECHO 系列共 10 期,每期 106 人;平均回复率=46%)、病例主讲人调查(每期 7 人,回复率=78%)以及全部 10 期 ECHO 课程后的成果调查(每期 11 人,回复率=25%)。结果 44 名医护人员参加了 ECHO 网络,他们来自不同的职业阶段和专业学科(半数为全科医生)。三分之一的参与者在南澳大利亚地区执业。参与者表示,ECHO 课程满足了他们的学习需求(系列课程的平均比例为 99%),与实践相关(系列课程的平均比例为 99%),使他们了解了疼痛护理的多学科和生物心理社会方法(系列课程的平均比例为 97%),并提供了积极的指导(系列课程的平均比例为 96%)。参与者的主要心得是验证患者体验以及将心理和社会方法纳入疼痛护理的重要性。超过三分之一的参与者(整个系列的平均比例为 42%)指出了在应用所学知识时遇到的障碍,例如会诊时间有限以及难以组建多学科团队。结论 ECHO 网络模式是一种可接受的、有效的跨学科教育模式,可帮助初级医疗服务提供者提高最佳疼痛护理实践能力,使其与以患者为中心的生物心理社会疼痛管理方法保持一致。然而,参与者认为在临床、服务和系统层面将这些知识转化为实践存在障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community healthcare system and its practice for Indigenous elders in Taiwan. Exploring oral health challenges and integration strategies in opioid treatment programs: perspectives from clinicians and clients. Exploring the associative relationship between general practice engagement and hospitalisation in older carers to potentially reduce hospital burden. Culturally safe physiotherapy care: how this looks and feels for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Implementation of a data-driven quality improvement program in primary care for patients with coronary heart disease: a mixed methods evaluation of acceptability, satisfaction, barriers and enablers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1