A propensity score-matched comparison between single-stage and multistage anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24423
Anisse N Chaker, Michael Melhem, Dheeraj Kagithala, Edvin Telemi, Tarek R Mansour, Leticia Simo, Kylie Springer, Lonni Schultz, Kari Jarabek, Anneliese F Rademacher, Matthew Brennan, Enoch Kim, David R Nerenz, Jad G Khalil, Richard Easton, Miguelangelo Perez-Cruet, Ilyas Aleem, Paul Park, Teck Soo, Doris Tong, Muwaffak Abdulhak, Jason M Schwalb, Victor Chang
{"title":"A propensity score-matched comparison between single-stage and multistage anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.","authors":"Anisse N Chaker, Michael Melhem, Dheeraj Kagithala, Edvin Telemi, Tarek R Mansour, Leticia Simo, Kylie Springer, Lonni Schultz, Kari Jarabek, Anneliese F Rademacher, Matthew Brennan, Enoch Kim, David R Nerenz, Jad G Khalil, Richard Easton, Miguelangelo Perez-Cruet, Ilyas Aleem, Paul Park, Teck Soo, Doris Tong, Muwaffak Abdulhak, Jason M Schwalb, Victor Chang","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients undergoing anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery can undergo either a single-stage or multistage operation, depending on surgeon preference. The goal of this study was to assess different patient outcomes between single-stage and multistage lumbar fusion procedures in a multicenter setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database was queried for anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgeries between July 2018 and January 2022. Patients who underwent either single-stage or multistage procedures were included. For multistage procedures, the first surgery included both anterior lumbar interbody fusions and lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and improvement in patient-reported outcomes: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, EQ-5D, and satisfaction. The two cohorts were propensity score matched, while Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used for multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one-to-one propensity score matching, 355 patients were identified in the single-stage and multistage cohorts. Single-stage procedures were associated with a lower risk of complications (p = 0.024), fewer emergency department visits (p = 0.029), and higher patient satisfaction after 1 year (p = 0.026) and 2 years (p = 0.007), compared with multistage procedures. After adjusting for baseline patient and operative characteristics, patients undergoing multistage procedures had a higher risk of complications (relative risk [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34; p = 0.026), were less likely to be satisfied after 1 year (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; p < 0.001), and were less likely to experience improvement in back pain after 90 days (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.039) and 2 years (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96; p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors observed that patients who undergo lumbar fusion surgery using a multistage approach have higher postoperative complication rates and are less likely to report satisfaction compared with a matched, single-stage procedure cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients undergoing anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery can undergo either a single-stage or multistage operation, depending on surgeon preference. The goal of this study was to assess different patient outcomes between single-stage and multistage lumbar fusion procedures in a multicenter setting.

Methods: The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database was queried for anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgeries between July 2018 and January 2022. Patients who underwent either single-stage or multistage procedures were included. For multistage procedures, the first surgery included both anterior lumbar interbody fusions and lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and improvement in patient-reported outcomes: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, EQ-5D, and satisfaction. The two cohorts were propensity score matched, while Poisson generalized estimating equation models were used for multivariate analyses.

Results: After one-to-one propensity score matching, 355 patients were identified in the single-stage and multistage cohorts. Single-stage procedures were associated with a lower risk of complications (p = 0.024), fewer emergency department visits (p = 0.029), and higher patient satisfaction after 1 year (p = 0.026) and 2 years (p = 0.007), compared with multistage procedures. After adjusting for baseline patient and operative characteristics, patients undergoing multistage procedures had a higher risk of complications (relative risk [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34; p = 0.026), were less likely to be satisfied after 1 year (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; p < 0.001), and were less likely to experience improvement in back pain after 90 days (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99; p = 0.039) and 2 years (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96; p = 0.023).

Conclusions: The authors observed that patients who undergo lumbar fusion surgery using a multistage approach have higher postoperative complication rates and are less likely to report satisfaction compared with a matched, single-stage procedure cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:接受前路/后路腰椎融合手术的患者可根据外科医生的偏好选择单段或多段手术。本研究的目的是在多中心环境下评估单段和多段腰椎融合手术对患者的不同治疗效果:在密歇根脊柱手术改进协作数据库中查询了2018年7月至2022年1月期间的前路/后路腰椎融合手术。纳入了接受单阶段或多阶段手术的患者。对于多阶段手术,第一次手术包括前路腰椎椎间融合术和侧路腰椎椎间融合术。主要结果包括术后并发症和患者报告结果的改善:患者报告结果测量信息系统身体功能、EQ-5D 和满意度。两个队列进行了倾向得分匹配,并使用泊松广义估计方程模型进行多变量分析:结果:经过一一对应的倾向评分匹配后,单阶段和多阶段队列中共有 355 名患者。与多阶段手术相比,单阶段手术的并发症风险更低(p = 0.024),急诊就诊次数更少(p = 0.029),1年后患者满意度更高(p = 0.026),2年后患者满意度更高(p = 0.007)。在对患者基线特征和手术特征进行调整后,接受多级手术的患者出现并发症的风险更高(相对风险 [RR] 1.17,95% CI 1.02-1.34;P = 0.026),1 年后满意度较低(RR 0.83,95% CI 0.74-0.93;p < 0.001),90 天后(RR 0.86,95% CI 0.75-0.99;p = 0.039)和 2 年后(RR 0.76,95% CI 0.60-0.96;p = 0.023)背痛改善的可能性较小(结论):作者观察到,与匹配的单阶段手术队列相比,使用多阶段方法接受腰椎融合手术的患者术后并发症发生率较高,满意度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
A propensity score-matched comparison between single-stage and multistage anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study. Return to play in professional football players following traumatic cervical spine injury: expert opinions from the National Football League spine surgeons. Assessing the prognostic impact of body composition phenotypes on surgical outcomes and survival in patients with spinal metastasis: a deep learning approach to preoperative CT analysis. Presentation, management, and outcome of traumatic spine injuries in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Opioid prescribing guidelines for spine surgery patients: a multisite analysis of guideline implementation and monitoring with an automated text messaging platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1