Sensitivity of the Load-Velocity Relationship Variables to Discriminate the Level of Fatigue Induced by Multiple Sets of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000005037
Deniz Şentürk, Zeki Akyildiz, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"Sensitivity of the Load-Velocity Relationship Variables to Discriminate the Level of Fatigue Induced by Multiple Sets of the Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift Exercise.","authors":"Deniz Şentürk, Zeki Akyildiz, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Şentürk, D, Akyildiz, Z, Janicijevic, D, and García-Ramos, A. Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the hexagonal barbell deadlift exercise. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aimed to evaluate changes in load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables (L0, v0, and Aline) after different fatigue protocols and to determine their correlation with changes in 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After determining the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) 1RM, 27 resistance-trained men randomly completed 3 sessions that only differed in the activity performed between 2 incremental loading tests that were performed at the beginning (presession) and end (postsession) of the session: (a) control protocol: no training; (b) moderate-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise at 70% 1RM performing half the maximum possible number of repetitions; and (c) high-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise performed to failure against the 70% 1RM. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. The reduction of 1RM (p < 0.001), v0 (p = 0.014), and Aline (p < 0.001) at postsession was greater for the high-fatigue protocol, followed by the moderate-fatigue protocol, and finally the control protocol. The changes in L0 did not differ between the fatigue protocols (p = 0.372). The percent change in the 1RM at postsession was significantly correlated with the percent change in Aline (r = 0.714) and L0 (r = 0.540), but not with the percent changes in v0 (r = 0.177). These results suggest that the L-V relationship variables offer a highly sensitive and practical solution for fatigue monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Şentürk, D, Akyildiz, Z, Janicijevic, D, and García-Ramos, A. Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the hexagonal barbell deadlift exercise. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aimed to evaluate changes in load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables (L0, v0, and Aline) after different fatigue protocols and to determine their correlation with changes in 1 repetition maximum (1RM). After determining the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) 1RM, 27 resistance-trained men randomly completed 3 sessions that only differed in the activity performed between 2 incremental loading tests that were performed at the beginning (presession) and end (postsession) of the session: (a) control protocol: no training; (b) moderate-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise at 70% 1RM performing half the maximum possible number of repetitions; and (c) high-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the HBD exercise performed to failure against the 70% 1RM. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. The reduction of 1RM (p < 0.001), v0 (p = 0.014), and Aline (p < 0.001) at postsession was greater for the high-fatigue protocol, followed by the moderate-fatigue protocol, and finally the control protocol. The changes in L0 did not differ between the fatigue protocols (p = 0.372). The percent change in the 1RM at postsession was significantly correlated with the percent change in Aline (r = 0.714) and L0 (r = 0.540), but not with the percent changes in v0 (r = 0.177). These results suggest that the L-V relationship variables offer a highly sensitive and practical solution for fatigue monitoring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Linear and Multidirectional Speed Testing (On-Field and Off-Field) Protocols in Senior and Elite Female Football. Understanding Training Load in Golf: A Survey of Swing Coaches, Performance Practitioners, and Medical Staff. Self-Regulated Learning Assessment in Young Soccer Players: Beyond Competitive Levels. Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1