Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Force Control Evaluations to Quantify Upper-Limbs Asymmetries Agreement in Professional Male Volleyball Players.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000005025
Samuel D'Emanuele, Gennaro Boccia, Veronica Zardo, Valter Durigon, Federico Schena, Cantor Tarperi
{"title":"Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Force Control Evaluations to Quantify Upper-Limbs Asymmetries Agreement in Professional Male Volleyball Players.","authors":"Samuel D'Emanuele, Gennaro Boccia, Veronica Zardo, Valter Durigon, Federico Schena, Cantor Tarperi","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>D'Emanuele, S, Boccia, G, Zardo, V, Durigon, V, Schena, F, and Tarperi, C. Strength, rate of force development, and force control evaluations to quantify upper-limbs asymmetries agreement in professional male volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Asymmetries are known to vary based on the nature of the sport and differ between individuals and the tests used. We explored interlimb asymmetries in muscle function among 13 national-level male volleyball players (24 ± 3 years; 87 ± 7 kg; 194 ± 7 cm; 19 ± 2 hours training/week), aiming to determine whether these asymmetries are muscle specific and consistent across various metrics. Subjects underwent assessments for elbow extensors and flexors in both limbs, including maximal contractions to assess the maximal voluntary force (MVF), submaximal ballistic contractions measuring Rate of Force Development (RFDpeak), Scaling Factor (RFD-SF), and evaluations of Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Coefficient of Variations, and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFAα) during sustained contractions. Repeated-mixed ANOVA within and between-factors assessed each metric's differences between muscle groups and limbs. Kappa coefficients (K) were calculated to determine the levels of agreement for the direction of asymmetry among muscle groups and different metrics at the individual level. Our findings revealed that asymmetries were muscle specific, with statistical significance observed only in flexors MVF (12%, p = 0.007, d = 0.68). The asymmetry direction agreement between metrics was null for all parameters except for MVF, which resulted in slight (K = 0.022) and fair (K = 0.308) for ApEn. The agreement between RFDpeak vs MVF (K = 0.386) was fair, slight between RFDpeak vs RFD-SF (K = 0.141), and null when comparing RFDpeak with ApEn and DFAα. At the individual level, no consistent performance advantage was found for either limb, despite volleyball's partial asymmetrical nature, emphasizing the importance of creating personalized training based on the muscle/limb of interest and the parameter to be improved (i.e., maximum strength or RFD).</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: D'Emanuele, S, Boccia, G, Zardo, V, Durigon, V, Schena, F, and Tarperi, C. Strength, rate of force development, and force control evaluations to quantify upper-limbs asymmetries agreement in professional male volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Asymmetries are known to vary based on the nature of the sport and differ between individuals and the tests used. We explored interlimb asymmetries in muscle function among 13 national-level male volleyball players (24 ± 3 years; 87 ± 7 kg; 194 ± 7 cm; 19 ± 2 hours training/week), aiming to determine whether these asymmetries are muscle specific and consistent across various metrics. Subjects underwent assessments for elbow extensors and flexors in both limbs, including maximal contractions to assess the maximal voluntary force (MVF), submaximal ballistic contractions measuring Rate of Force Development (RFDpeak), Scaling Factor (RFD-SF), and evaluations of Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Coefficient of Variations, and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFAα) during sustained contractions. Repeated-mixed ANOVA within and between-factors assessed each metric's differences between muscle groups and limbs. Kappa coefficients (K) were calculated to determine the levels of agreement for the direction of asymmetry among muscle groups and different metrics at the individual level. Our findings revealed that asymmetries were muscle specific, with statistical significance observed only in flexors MVF (12%, p = 0.007, d = 0.68). The asymmetry direction agreement between metrics was null for all parameters except for MVF, which resulted in slight (K = 0.022) and fair (K = 0.308) for ApEn. The agreement between RFDpeak vs MVF (K = 0.386) was fair, slight between RFDpeak vs RFD-SF (K = 0.141), and null when comparing RFDpeak with ApEn and DFAα. At the individual level, no consistent performance advantage was found for either limb, despite volleyball's partial asymmetrical nature, emphasizing the importance of creating personalized training based on the muscle/limb of interest and the parameter to be improved (i.e., maximum strength or RFD).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Linear and Multidirectional Speed Testing (On-Field and Off-Field) Protocols in Senior and Elite Female Football. Understanding Training Load in Golf: A Survey of Swing Coaches, Performance Practitioners, and Medical Staff. Self-Regulated Learning Assessment in Young Soccer Players: Beyond Competitive Levels. Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1