Alone and Together: Exploring the Relationship Between Individual and Social Metacognition in College Biology Students During Problem Solving.

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Cbe-Life Sciences Education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1187/cbe.24-05-0156
Emily K Bremers, Olive K McKay, Julie Dangremond Stanton
{"title":"Alone and Together: Exploring the Relationship Between Individual and Social Metacognition in College Biology Students During Problem Solving.","authors":"Emily K Bremers, Olive K McKay, Julie Dangremond Stanton","doi":"10.1187/cbe.24-05-0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When students use metacognition, they can more effectively problem solve on their own and in groups. Most metacognition studies have focused on individual learners while a few studies have begun to explore the metacognition learners use in social settings. Little is known about the comparison between how an individual student may use metacognition in solitary and collaborative contexts. To explore the relationship between individual and social metacognition, we asked: how do life science students' approaches for metacognition while problem solving on their own relate to their metacognitive approaches when problem solving in groups? We recorded students working in small groups and conducted think-aloud interviews with the same students. By coding for metacognition, we found that students vary in their use of metacognition during individual and group problem solving. The majority of the students in our study used similar metacognitive approaches across settings, while other students showed greater evidence of one form of metacognition over the other. Interestingly, we found that students corrected or evaluated their peers' thinking more than their own thinking, and we hypothesize that group dynamics can affect students' social metacognition. We present our results in a series of cases that illustrate the variation observed and offer suggestions for instructors for promoting metacognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":56321,"journal":{"name":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"ar1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cbe-Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-05-0156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When students use metacognition, they can more effectively problem solve on their own and in groups. Most metacognition studies have focused on individual learners while a few studies have begun to explore the metacognition learners use in social settings. Little is known about the comparison between how an individual student may use metacognition in solitary and collaborative contexts. To explore the relationship between individual and social metacognition, we asked: how do life science students' approaches for metacognition while problem solving on their own relate to their metacognitive approaches when problem solving in groups? We recorded students working in small groups and conducted think-aloud interviews with the same students. By coding for metacognition, we found that students vary in their use of metacognition during individual and group problem solving. The majority of the students in our study used similar metacognitive approaches across settings, while other students showed greater evidence of one form of metacognition over the other. Interestingly, we found that students corrected or evaluated their peers' thinking more than their own thinking, and we hypothesize that group dynamics can affect students' social metacognition. We present our results in a series of cases that illustrate the variation observed and offer suggestions for instructors for promoting metacognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单独与共同:探讨大学生物学学生解题过程中个体元认知与社会元认知的关系。
当学生使用元认知时,他们可以更有效地独立和小组解决问题。大多数元认知研究都集中在学习者个体上,而少数研究开始探索学习者在社会环境下的元认知使用。对于个体学生在单独和合作环境中如何使用元认知的比较,我们知之甚少。为了探讨个体与社会元认知之间的关系,我们提出了这样的问题:生命科学专业学生在独立解决问题时的元认知方法与他们在群体解决问题时的元认知方法有何关系?我们记录了学生在小组中工作的情况,并对这些学生进行了思考访谈。通过对元认知进行编码,我们发现学生在个人和群体问题解决过程中对元认知的使用存在差异。在我们的研究中,大多数学生在不同的环境中使用了类似的元认知方法,而其他学生则表现出更强的一种元认知形式。有趣的是,我们发现学生纠正或评价同伴的思维比自己的思维更多,我们假设群体动力学会影响学生的社会元认知。我们在一系列案例中展示了我们的结果,说明了观察到的变化,并为教师提供了促进元认知的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cbe-Life Sciences Education
Cbe-Life Sciences Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CBE—Life Sciences Education (LSE), a free, online quarterly journal, is published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB). The journal was launched in spring 2002 as Cell Biology Education—A Journal of Life Science Education. The ASCB changed the name of the journal in spring 2006 to better reflect the breadth of its readership and the scope of its submissions. LSE publishes peer-reviewed articles on life science education at the K–12, undergraduate, and graduate levels. The ASCB believes that learning in biology encompasses diverse fields, including math, chemistry, physics, engineering, computer science, and the interdisciplinary intersections of biology with these fields. Within biology, LSE focuses on how students are introduced to the study of life sciences, as well as approaches in cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics.
期刊最新文献
Building Communities of Practice among Undergraduate STEM Departments to Foster Emergent Transformation: A Report on the Impact of Multiple-year Engagement within the PULSE Midwest and Great Plains Regional Network. Cisnormative Language and Erasure of Trans* and Genderqueer Student Representation in Biology Education Research. Exploring Resources and Reasoning Practices in Socioscientific System Modeling for Justice-Centered Science Education. Alone and Together: Exploring the Relationship Between Individual and Social Metacognition in College Biology Students During Problem Solving. An Asynchronous Chemistry-in-biology Intervention Improves Student Content Knowledge and Performance in Introductory Biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1