A Framework for the Analysis of Communication Errors in Health Care.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001303
John A Bender, Sreedevi Thiyagarajan, Wendy Morrish, Maisha Mims, Edward E Yackel
{"title":"A Framework for the Analysis of Communication Errors in Health Care.","authors":"John A Bender, Sreedevi Thiyagarajan, Wendy Morrish, Maisha Mims, Edward E Yackel","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study was to develop a systematic method to identify and classify different types of communication failures leading to patient safety events. We aimed to develop a taxonomy code sheet for identifying communication errors and provide a framework tool to classify the communication error types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study used the Delphi method to develop a taxonomy code sheet for identifying communication errors reported in the Veterans Health Administration patient safety databases between April 2018 and March 2021. We also used Natural Language Processing to create a framework tool to classify the 9 types of communication errors using this taxonomy. Finally, analysis was done to identify affected clinical locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9 types of communication failures that impacted clinical outcomes using the taxonomy code sheet developed. The top 3 errors were related to nonadherence to facility standard operating procedures (993, 37.6%), followed by written errors (e.g., unclear documentation or not using plain language) (587, 22.3%) and no communication (347, 13.2%). The remaining categories of communication types are electronic (253, 9.6%), verbal (205, 7.8%), hand-off (124, 4.7%), visual (76, 2.9%), listening (41, 1.6%), and nonverbal (12, 0.5%). A cognitive aide was developed to demonstrate the step-by-step method for using the framework tool to classify the communication errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cognitive aide and the framework tool developed in this study can be used in any healthcare setting to identify and classify communication failures and mitigate potential risks contributing to safety events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to develop a systematic method to identify and classify different types of communication failures leading to patient safety events. We aimed to develop a taxonomy code sheet for identifying communication errors and provide a framework tool to classify the communication error types.

Methods: This observational study used the Delphi method to develop a taxonomy code sheet for identifying communication errors reported in the Veterans Health Administration patient safety databases between April 2018 and March 2021. We also used Natural Language Processing to create a framework tool to classify the 9 types of communication errors using this taxonomy. Finally, analysis was done to identify affected clinical locations.

Results: We identified 9 types of communication failures that impacted clinical outcomes using the taxonomy code sheet developed. The top 3 errors were related to nonadherence to facility standard operating procedures (993, 37.6%), followed by written errors (e.g., unclear documentation or not using plain language) (587, 22.3%) and no communication (347, 13.2%). The remaining categories of communication types are electronic (253, 9.6%), verbal (205, 7.8%), hand-off (124, 4.7%), visual (76, 2.9%), listening (41, 1.6%), and nonverbal (12, 0.5%). A cognitive aide was developed to demonstrate the step-by-step method for using the framework tool to classify the communication errors.

Conclusions: The cognitive aide and the framework tool developed in this study can be used in any healthcare setting to identify and classify communication failures and mitigate potential risks contributing to safety events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健中沟通错误分析的框架。
目的:本研究的目的是开发一种系统的方法来识别和分类导致患者安全事件的不同类型的通信失败。我们的目标是开发一个用于识别通信错误的分类法代码表,并提供一个框架工具来对通信错误类型进行分类。方法:本观察性研究采用德尔菲法开发分类代码表,用于识别2018年4月至2021年3月期间退伍军人健康管理局患者安全数据库中报告的通信错误。我们还使用自然语言处理创建了一个框架工具,使用该分类法对9种类型的通信错误进行分类。最后,进行分析以确定受影响的临床部位。结果:我们使用开发的分类代码表确定了影响临床结果的9种类型的通信失败。排在前3位的错误与不遵守设施标准操作程序有关(993例,37.6%),其次是书面错误(例如,文件不清楚或没有使用简单的语言)(587例,22.3%)和没有沟通(347例,13.2%)。其余类型的沟通类型是电子(253,9.6%),言语(205,7.8%),移交(124,4.7%),视觉(76,2.9%),听力(41,1.6%)和非言语(12,0.5%)。开发了一个认知助手来演示使用框架工具对通信错误进行分类的逐步方法。结论:本研究开发的认知辅助工具和框架工具可用于任何医疗保健环境,以识别和分类沟通失败,并减轻导致安全事件的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Patient Falls in the Operating Room: The Danger of an Obese Patient on an Unlocked Operating Room Table. Decreasing Hospital-acquired Pressure Injuries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5-step Quality Improvement Approach. Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study. The Relationship Between Medical Error Attitudes of Surgical Nurses and Evidence-Based Work Environment. It's Called "Informed Consent," But How "Informed" Are Patients? A Patient Perspective on Informed Consent in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1