Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1051/ject/2024026
Gregory S Matte, William L Regan, Sarah I Gadille, Kevin R Connor, Sharon L Boyle, Francis E Fynn-Thompson
{"title":"Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm.","authors":"Gregory S Matte, William L Regan, Sarah I Gadille, Kevin R Connor, Sharon L Boyle, Francis E Fynn-Thompson","doi":"10.1051/ject/2024026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Membrane oxygenator failure remains a concern for perfusion teams. Successful outcomes for this low-frequency, high-risk intervention are predicated on having written institutional protocols for both the oxygenator change-out procedure as well as how often the procedure is practiced by staff perfusionists. A recent review of peer-reviewed journal articles, textbooks and online resources revealed a lack of a unified intervention algorithm for failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While an oxygenator change-out procedure may still be considered the gold standard for a confirmed device failure, temporizing measures exist that, in select cases, can afford time to the clinical team and even obviate the need for an oxygenator change-out procedure. We now consider the venous piggyback technique sourcing blood from the venous limb of the circuit a first-line intervention to afford enhanced patient safety while the clinical team decides on required interventions when oxygenator failure presents during CPB.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"56 4","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Membrane oxygenator failure remains a concern for perfusion teams. Successful outcomes for this low-frequency, high-risk intervention are predicated on having written institutional protocols for both the oxygenator change-out procedure as well as how often the procedure is practiced by staff perfusionists. A recent review of peer-reviewed journal articles, textbooks and online resources revealed a lack of a unified intervention algorithm for failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While an oxygenator change-out procedure may still be considered the gold standard for a confirmed device failure, temporizing measures exist that, in select cases, can afford time to the clinical team and even obviate the need for an oxygenator change-out procedure. We now consider the venous piggyback technique sourcing blood from the venous limb of the circuit a first-line intervention to afford enhanced patient safety while the clinical team decides on required interventions when oxygenator failure presents during CPB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肺旁路过程中氧合失败;治疗方案和干预算法。
膜氧合器失效仍然是灌注团队关注的问题。这种低频率、高风险干预的成功结果取决于是否有关于氧合器更换程序的书面机构协议,以及工作人员灌注师执行该程序的频率。最近对同行评议的期刊文章、教科书和在线资源的回顾显示,对于体外循环(CPB)期间氧合失败缺乏统一的干预算法。虽然更换氧合器程序可能仍然被认为是确定设备故障的金标准,但在某些情况下,存在一些临时措施,可以为临床团队提供时间,甚至可以避免更换氧合器程序。我们现在认为,当CPB过程中氧合器出现故障时,临床团队决定所需的干预措施时,从静脉回路的静脉肢体获取血液的静脉背载技术是一种一线干预措施,可以提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing lung transplantation with ECMO: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, outcomes, and future considerations. Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm. Interaction of milrinone with extracorporeal life support. Plasmapheresis for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-induced hemolysis in infants. List of JECT reviewers 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1