Impact of the distance of spread through air spaces in non-small cell lung cancer.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae181
Asato Hashinokuchi, Takaki Akamine, Gouji Toyokawa, Kyoto Matsudo, Taichi Nagano, Fumihiko Kinoshita, Mikihiro Kohno, Takumi Tomonaga, Kenichi Kohashi, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Yoshinao Oda, Tomoyoshi Takenaka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
{"title":"Impact of the distance of spread through air spaces in non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Asato Hashinokuchi, Takaki Akamine, Gouji Toyokawa, Kyoto Matsudo, Taichi Nagano, Fumihiko Kinoshita, Mikihiro Kohno, Takumi Tomonaga, Kenichi Kohashi, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Yoshinao Oda, Tomoyoshi Takenaka, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Spread through air spaces (STAS) is considered a poor prognostic factor in patients with resected non-small lung cell cancer; however, the clinical significance of STAS extent remains unclear. We hypothesized that the further the tumour cells spread from the tumour edge, the worse the prognosis becomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed the data of 642 patients with completely resected pathological stage I-III non-small lung cell cancer between 2008 and 2018. The maximum spread distance (MSD) from the tumour edge to the farthest STAS was quantitatively evaluated, and STAS was categorized as limited (MSD ≤1000 μm) or extended (MSD >1000 μm), based on the median MSD. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients stratified by STAS classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were classified into STAS-negative (n = 382, 59.6%), limited STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) and extended STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) groups. Extended STAS was associated with a high maximum standardized uptake value, advanced pathological stage and vascular invasion compared with limited STAS. The extended STAS group demonstrated significantly shorter RFS and OS than both the limited STAS and STAS-negative groups (both P < 0.001 for RFS; P = 0.007 and P < 0.001 for OS, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that extended STAS was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distance from tumour edge to STAS affects prognosis in patients with completely resected non-small lung cell cancer.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>IRB approval number: 2019-232.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Spread through air spaces (STAS) is considered a poor prognostic factor in patients with resected non-small lung cell cancer; however, the clinical significance of STAS extent remains unclear. We hypothesized that the further the tumour cells spread from the tumour edge, the worse the prognosis becomes.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the data of 642 patients with completely resected pathological stage I-III non-small lung cell cancer between 2008 and 2018. The maximum spread distance (MSD) from the tumour edge to the farthest STAS was quantitatively evaluated, and STAS was categorized as limited (MSD ≤1000 μm) or extended (MSD >1000 μm), based on the median MSD. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients stratified by STAS classification.

Results: Patients were classified into STAS-negative (n = 382, 59.6%), limited STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) and extended STAS (n = 130, 20.2%) groups. Extended STAS was associated with a high maximum standardized uptake value, advanced pathological stage and vascular invasion compared with limited STAS. The extended STAS group demonstrated significantly shorter RFS and OS than both the limited STAS and STAS-negative groups (both P < 0.001 for RFS; P = 0.007 and P < 0.001 for OS, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that extended STAS was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: The distance from tumour edge to STAS affects prognosis in patients with completely resected non-small lung cell cancer.

Clinical registration number: IRB approval number: 2019-232.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非小细胞肺癌气隙扩散距离的影响。
目的:经空气间隙扩散(STAS)被认为是切除的非小肺细胞癌(NSCLC)患者预后不良的因素;然而,STAS范围的临床意义尚不清楚。我们假设肿瘤细胞从肿瘤边缘扩散得越远,预后就越差。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2018年642例完全切除的病理I ~ III期NSCLC患者的资料。定量评估从肿瘤边缘到最远STAS的最大扩散距离(MSD),并根据中位MSD将STAS分为有限(MSD≤1000 μm)或扩展(MSD >1000 μm)。比较按STAS分类的患者的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:患者分为STAS阴性组(n = 382, 59.6%)、有限STAS组(n = 130, 20.2%)和扩展STAS组(n = 130, 20.2%)。与有限STAS相比,延长STAS与较高的最大标准化摄取值、较晚的病理分期和血管侵犯有关。延长STAS组的RFS和OS明显短于限制STAS组和STAS阴性组(均为pp结论:肿瘤边缘到STAS的距离影响完全切除的NSCLC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational fluid dynamics to simulate stenotic lesions in coronary end-to-side anastomosis. Long-term retention of the pedicled thymic flap after bronchial stump coverage. Closure of ventricular septal defect in children with trisomy 18: perioperative events and long-term survival. Intraoperative aortic dissection in a patient with cervical aortic arch. Hyperacute silicosis after bronchoscopy-induced melanoptysis in a lung transplant patient. A first report in literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1