Identifying borderline traits in a Brazilian community sample using the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 factors.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871
André Pereira Gonçalves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho
{"title":"Identifying borderline traits in a Brazilian community sample using the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 factors.","authors":"André Pereira Gonçalves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the discriminative capacity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) factors for identifying individuals with elevated borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits within a Brazilian community sample while proposing an optimal cutoff score for distinguishing high BPD trait levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participant cohort consisted of 1,469 adults who completed assessments, including the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS), the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) (PID-5), the IDCP-2, and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) - Personality Questionnaire (PQ-SCID-II). We categorized participants into three groups utilizing the traits outlined in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from DSM-5 Section III. Furthermore, latent profile analysis based on PID-5 facets revealed the existence of three empirically derived profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that IDCP-2 factors exhibited substantial discriminative power, marked by large effect sizes across most factors. To minimize false negatives, we suggest a conservative cutoff score of 22 as the most effective threshold for identifying individuals with high levels of BPD traits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPD score generated from IDCP-2 factors holds significant promise in clinical practice, offering valuable insights into a patient's propensity to exhibit a BPD profile and providing a comprehensive clinical profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e20240871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the discriminative capacity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) factors for identifying individuals with elevated borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits within a Brazilian community sample while proposing an optimal cutoff score for distinguishing high BPD trait levels.

Methods: The participant cohort consisted of 1,469 adults who completed assessments, including the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS), the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) (PID-5), the IDCP-2, and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) - Personality Questionnaire (PQ-SCID-II). We categorized participants into three groups utilizing the traits outlined in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from DSM-5 Section III. Furthermore, latent profile analysis based on PID-5 facets revealed the existence of three empirically derived profiles.

Results: Our findings demonstrate that IDCP-2 factors exhibited substantial discriminative power, marked by large effect sizes across most factors. To minimize false negatives, we suggest a conservative cutoff score of 22 as the most effective threshold for identifying individuals with high levels of BPD traits.

Conclusion: The BPD score generated from IDCP-2 factors holds significant promise in clinical practice, offering valuable insights into a patient's propensity to exhibit a BPD profile and providing a comprehensive clinical profile.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用维度临床人格量表2因素识别巴西社区样本中的边缘特征。
目的:本研究旨在检验维度临床人格量表2 (IDCP-2)因素在识别巴西社区样本中边缘型人格障碍(BPD)特征升高个体方面的判别能力,同时提出区分高BPD特征水平的最佳临界值。方法:1469名成年人完成了人格功能水平量表-简要表格2.0 (LPFS)、DSM-5人格量表(PID-5)、IDCP-2和DSM-IV人格问卷(PQ-SCID-II)的结构化临床访谈。我们利用DSM-5第三节中人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中概述的特征将参与者分为三组。此外,基于PID-5方面的潜在剖面分析显示存在三个经验推导的剖面。结果:我们的研究结果表明,IDCP-2因素表现出实质性的判别能力,在大多数因素中表现出较大的效应量。为了最大限度地减少假阴性,我们建议保守的临界值为22分,作为识别高水平BPD特征个体的最有效阈值。结论:由IDCP-2因子生成的BPD评分在临床实践中具有重要的前景,为了解患者表现出BPD特征的倾向提供了有价值的见解,并提供了全面的临床特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Serum BDNF levels in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. WITHDRAWN: Topiramate Therapy in Cocaine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Impact of two digital parent training models for managing challenging behaviors and food selectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder. New insights into susceptibility to major depression in a Colombian population. Prevalence of autism in African countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1