Identifying borderline traits in a Brazilian community sample using the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 factors.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871
André Pereira Gonçalves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho
{"title":"Identifying borderline traits in a Brazilian community sample using the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 factors.","authors":"André Pereira Gonçalves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the discriminative capacity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) factors for identifying individuals with elevated borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits within a Brazilian community sample while proposing an optimal cutoff score for distinguishing high BPD trait levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participant cohort consisted of 1,469 adults who completed assessments, including the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS), the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) (PID-5), the IDCP-2, and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) - Personality Questionnaire (PQ-SCID-II). We categorized participants into three groups utilizing the traits outlined in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from DSM-5 Section III. Furthermore, latent profile analysis based on PID-5 facets revealed the existence of three empirically derived profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that IDCP-2 factors exhibited substantial discriminative power, marked by large effect sizes across most factors. To minimize false negatives, we suggest a conservative cutoff score of 22 as the most effective threshold for identifying individuals with high levels of BPD traits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPD score generated from IDCP-2 factors holds significant promise in clinical practice, offering valuable insights into a patient's propensity to exhibit a BPD profile and providing a comprehensive clinical profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e20240871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2024-0871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the discriminative capacity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) factors for identifying individuals with elevated borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits within a Brazilian community sample while proposing an optimal cutoff score for distinguishing high BPD trait levels.

Methods: The participant cohort consisted of 1,469 adults who completed assessments, including the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS), the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) (PID-5), the IDCP-2, and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) - Personality Questionnaire (PQ-SCID-II). We categorized participants into three groups utilizing the traits outlined in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from DSM-5 Section III. Furthermore, latent profile analysis based on PID-5 facets revealed the existence of three empirically derived profiles.

Results: Our findings demonstrate that IDCP-2 factors exhibited substantial discriminative power, marked by large effect sizes across most factors. To minimize false negatives, we suggest a conservative cutoff score of 22 as the most effective threshold for identifying individuals with high levels of BPD traits.

Conclusion: The BPD score generated from IDCP-2 factors holds significant promise in clinical practice, offering valuable insights into a patient's propensity to exhibit a BPD profile and providing a comprehensive clinical profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用维度临床人格量表2因素识别巴西社区样本中的边缘特征。
目的:本研究旨在检验维度临床人格量表2 (IDCP-2)因素在识别巴西社区样本中边缘型人格障碍(BPD)特征升高个体方面的判别能力,同时提出区分高BPD特征水平的最佳临界值。方法:1469名成年人完成了人格功能水平量表-简要表格2.0 (LPFS)、DSM-5人格量表(PID-5)、IDCP-2和DSM-IV人格问卷(PQ-SCID-II)的结构化临床访谈。我们利用DSM-5第三节中人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中概述的特征将参与者分为三组。此外,基于PID-5方面的潜在剖面分析显示存在三个经验推导的剖面。结果:我们的研究结果表明,IDCP-2因素表现出实质性的判别能力,在大多数因素中表现出较大的效应量。为了最大限度地减少假阴性,我们建议保守的临界值为22分,作为识别高水平BPD特征个体的最有效阈值。结论:由IDCP-2因子生成的BPD评分在临床实践中具有重要的前景,为了解患者表现出BPD特征的倾向提供了有价值的见解,并提供了全面的临床特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Effects of a single-session facial emotion recognition training using the MTS paradigm in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Nonsuicidal self-injury behavior and internet use profile in undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of mental disorders according to DSM-5 in older adults living in the community: a cross-sectional study. The association between loot boxes and gambling in children and adolescents. Which Psychotherapy Model Should be Used in Psilocybin Treatment for Depression?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1