Why should I trust you? Influence of explanation design on consumer behavior in AI-based services

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Service Management Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1108/josm-05-2024-0223
Florence Nizette, Wafa Hammedi, Allard C.R. van Riel, Nadia Steils
{"title":"Why should I trust you? Influence of explanation design on consumer behavior in AI-based services","authors":"Florence Nizette, Wafa Hammedi, Allard C.R. van Riel, Nadia Steils","doi":"10.1108/josm-05-2024-0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study explores how the format of explanations used in artificial intelligence (AI)-based services affects consumer behavior, specifically the effects of explanation detail (low vs high) and consumer control (automatic vs on demand) on trust and acceptance. The aim is to provide service providers with insights into how to optimize the format of explanations to enhance consumer evaluations of AI-based services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Drawing on the literature on explainable AI (XAI) and information overload theory, a conceptual model is developed. To empirically test the conceptual model, two between-subjects experiments were conducted wherein the level of detail and level of control were manipulated, taking AI-based recommendations as a use case. The data were analyzed via partial least squares (PLS) regressions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results reveal significant positive correlations between level of detail and perceived understanding and between level of detail and perceived assurance. The level of control negatively moderates the relationship between the level of detail and perceived understanding. Further analyses revealed that the perceived competence and perceived integrity of AI systems positively and significantly influence the acceptance and purchase intentions of AI-based services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This research offers service providers key insights into how tailored explanations and maintaining a balance between detail and control build consumer trust and enhance AI-based service outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This article elucidates the nuanced interplay between the level of detail and control over explanations for non-expert consumers in high-credence service sectors. The findings offer insights into the design of more consumer-centric explanations to increase the acceptance of AI-based services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-05-2024-0223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores how the format of explanations used in artificial intelligence (AI)-based services affects consumer behavior, specifically the effects of explanation detail (low vs high) and consumer control (automatic vs on demand) on trust and acceptance. The aim is to provide service providers with insights into how to optimize the format of explanations to enhance consumer evaluations of AI-based services.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on the literature on explainable AI (XAI) and information overload theory, a conceptual model is developed. To empirically test the conceptual model, two between-subjects experiments were conducted wherein the level of detail and level of control were manipulated, taking AI-based recommendations as a use case. The data were analyzed via partial least squares (PLS) regressions.

Findings

The results reveal significant positive correlations between level of detail and perceived understanding and between level of detail and perceived assurance. The level of control negatively moderates the relationship between the level of detail and perceived understanding. Further analyses revealed that the perceived competence and perceived integrity of AI systems positively and significantly influence the acceptance and purchase intentions of AI-based services.

Practical implications

This research offers service providers key insights into how tailored explanations and maintaining a balance between detail and control build consumer trust and enhance AI-based service outcomes.

Originality/value

This article elucidates the nuanced interplay between the level of detail and control over explanations for non-expert consumers in high-credence service sectors. The findings offer insights into the design of more consumer-centric explanations to increase the acceptance of AI-based services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我为什么要相信你?人工智能服务中解释设计对消费者行为的影响
本研究探讨基于人工智能(AI)的服务中使用的解释格式如何影响消费者行为,特别是解释细节(低vs高)和消费者控制(自动vs按需)对信任和接受的影响。其目的是为服务提供商提供如何优化解释格式的见解,以提高消费者对基于人工智能的服务的评价。设计/方法/方法借鉴可解释人工智能(XAI)和信息过载理论的文献,开发了一个概念模型。为了对概念模型进行实证检验,以基于人工智能的推荐为用例,进行了两个受试者之间的实验,其中对细节水平和控制水平进行了操纵。数据通过偏最小二乘(PLS)回归进行分析。研究结果显示,细节水平与感知理解之间、细节水平与感知确信之间存在显著的正相关。控制水平负向调节细节水平和感知理解之间的关系。进一步的分析表明,人工智能系统的感知能力和感知完整性对人工智能服务的接受度和购买意愿产生了积极而显著的影响。实际意义本研究为服务提供商提供了关键的见解,帮助他们了解量身定制的解释和保持细节与控制之间的平衡如何建立消费者信任,并增强基于人工智能的服务结果。原创性/价值这篇文章阐明了在高可信度的服务部门中,细节水平和对非专家消费者解释的控制之间微妙的相互作用。这些发现为设计更多以消费者为中心的解释提供了见解,以提高对基于人工智能的服务的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Boundary-breaking opportunities in service failure and recovery Service robot–employee task allocation strategies: well-being within the intrusion challenge The effect of language style in online reviews on consumers’ word-of-mouth recommendations Why should I trust you? Influence of explanation design on consumer behavior in AI-based services Institutional dissonance and innovation: higher education from a service ecosystems perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1