Business as Usual? Assessing Amplified Political Posts Across Social Media Platforms During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Social Media + Society Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/20563051241301203
Roy Aulie Jacobsen, Anders Olof Larsson
{"title":"Business as Usual? Assessing Amplified Political Posts Across Social Media Platforms During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Roy Aulie Jacobsen, Anders Olof Larsson","doi":"10.1177/20563051241301203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter (now X), play a crucial role in facilitating connections between politicians and citizens, particularly during a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines the characteristics of viral social media posts in Norway and Sweden during the initial wave of the pandemic. Despite their geographical proximity and cultural similarities, Norway and Sweden adopted different approaches to the pandemic, providing a compelling basis for comparative analysis. Employing a visual computational approach, this study maps viral posts by analyzing engagement metrics such as likes, reactions, shares, and comments. A close reading of popular posts investigates the communication strategies employed across platforms and national contexts. The findings reveal that political criticism on Twitter attracted substantial engagement, while Instagram posts leaned toward self-promotion. On Facebook, popular posts exhibited a more varied use of communication strategies, reflecting a nuanced approach to engagement across different social media environments.","PeriodicalId":47920,"journal":{"name":"Social Media + Society","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Media + Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241301203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter (now X), play a crucial role in facilitating connections between politicians and citizens, particularly during a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines the characteristics of viral social media posts in Norway and Sweden during the initial wave of the pandemic. Despite their geographical proximity and cultural similarities, Norway and Sweden adopted different approaches to the pandemic, providing a compelling basis for comparative analysis. Employing a visual computational approach, this study maps viral posts by analyzing engagement metrics such as likes, reactions, shares, and comments. A close reading of popular posts investigates the communication strategies employed across platforms and national contexts. The findings reveal that political criticism on Twitter attracted substantial engagement, while Instagram posts leaned toward self-promotion. On Facebook, popular posts exhibited a more varied use of communication strategies, reflecting a nuanced approach to engagement across different social media environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一切照旧?评估 COVID-19 大流行期间社交媒体平台上被放大的政治帖子
社交媒体平台,如 Facebook、Instagram 和 Twitter(现在的 X),在促进政治家与公民之间的联系方面发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行这样的危机期间。本文研究了挪威和瑞典在疫情初期病毒式社交媒体帖子的特点。尽管挪威和瑞典地理位置相近、文化相似,但两国在应对大流行病时却采取了不同的方法,这为比较分析提供了令人信服的依据。本研究采用可视化计算方法,通过分析参与度指标(如喜欢、反应、分享和评论)来绘制病毒性帖子。通过对热门帖子的细读,研究了在不同平台和国家背景下采用的传播策略。研究结果表明,Twitter 上的政治批评吸引了大量参与,而 Instagram 上的帖子则倾向于自我宣传。在 Facebook 上,热门帖子展示了更多样的传播策略,反映了在不同社交媒体环境中参与的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Media + Society
Social Media + Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Media + Society is an open access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal that focuses on the socio-cultural, political, psychological, historical, economic, legal and policy dimensions of social media in societies past, contemporary and future. We publish interdisciplinary work that draws from the social sciences, humanities and computational social sciences, reaches out to the arts and natural sciences, and we endorse mixed methods and methodologies. The journal is open to a diversity of theoretic paradigms and methodologies. The editorial vision of Social Media + Society draws inspiration from research on social media to outline a field of study poised to reflexively grow as social technologies evolve. We foster the open access of sharing of research on the social properties of media, as they manifest themselves through the uses people make of networked platforms past and present, digital and non. The journal presents a collaborative, open, and shared space, dedicated exclusively to the study of social media and their implications for societies. It facilitates state-of-the-art research on cutting-edge trends and allows scholars to focus and track trends specific to this field of study.
期刊最新文献
Closing the Door to Remain Open: The Politics of Openness and the Practices of Strategic Closure in the Fediverse Business as Usual? Assessing Amplified Political Posts Across Social Media Platforms During the COVID-19 Pandemic Afropolitan Influence: Gender, Comedy, and Social Media in Global Africa Asymmetric Consumptive News Feed Curation? Examining How Perceived News Feed Performance Influences Boosting and Limiting Curation on Facebook #BookTok’s Peer Pedagogies: Invitations to Learn About Books and Reading on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1