Experience in sports and music influences motor imagery: Insights from implicit and explicit measures.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104650
Judith Bek, Richard O'Farrell, Sarah M Cooney
{"title":"Experience in sports and music influences motor imagery: Insights from implicit and explicit measures.","authors":"Judith Bek, Richard O'Farrell, Sarah M Cooney","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor imagery (MI) can be an effective strategy for learning and enhancing movement or as an alternative training modality when physical practice is compromised. Individual differences in MI ability are widely documented but the role of experience in different activities in influencing MI is not well understood. The present study examined how experience in activities associated with the use of MI influences implicit and explicit MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed a hand laterality judgement task (N = 84) and a MI questionnaire (MIQ-3; N = 59) online. These implicit and explicit measures of MI were analysed in relation to frequent experience in individual sports/exercise, team sports, dance, and playing a musical instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants reported using both visual and kinesthetic MI within their activities. Across activities, frequent experience was associated with more accurate hand laterality judgement, as well as increased biomechanical constraint effects, particularly for hands viewed from the palm. In relation to the different activity types, significant effects were found for individual and team sports and music, but not dance. Participants' level of training was associated with ratings of explicit MI (MIQ-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experience in activities that utilise MI influences implicit MI, while formal training may have a stronger influence on explicit MI. Activity-specific effects on MI may reflect differences in kinesthetic and visual experience of the different hand surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"252 ","pages":"104650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motor imagery (MI) can be an effective strategy for learning and enhancing movement or as an alternative training modality when physical practice is compromised. Individual differences in MI ability are widely documented but the role of experience in different activities in influencing MI is not well understood. The present study examined how experience in activities associated with the use of MI influences implicit and explicit MI.

Methods: Participants completed a hand laterality judgement task (N = 84) and a MI questionnaire (MIQ-3; N = 59) online. These implicit and explicit measures of MI were analysed in relation to frequent experience in individual sports/exercise, team sports, dance, and playing a musical instrument.

Results: The majority of participants reported using both visual and kinesthetic MI within their activities. Across activities, frequent experience was associated with more accurate hand laterality judgement, as well as increased biomechanical constraint effects, particularly for hands viewed from the palm. In relation to the different activity types, significant effects were found for individual and team sports and music, but not dance. Participants' level of training was associated with ratings of explicit MI (MIQ-3).

Conclusion: Experience in activities that utilise MI influences implicit MI, while formal training may have a stronger influence on explicit MI. Activity-specific effects on MI may reflect differences in kinesthetic and visual experience of the different hand surfaces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动和音乐经验影响运动意象:来自内隐和外显测量的见解。
背景:运动想象(MI)可以是学习和增强运动的有效策略,也可以作为身体练习受损时的替代训练方式。MI能力的个体差异已被广泛记录,但不同活动中的经验在影响MI中的作用尚未得到很好的理解。本研究考察了与MI使用相关的活动经验如何影响内隐和外显MI。方法:参与者完成一项手侧性判断任务(N = 84)和一份MI问卷(MIQ-3;N = 59)在线。这些隐性和显性的MI测量与频繁的个人运动/锻炼、团队运动、舞蹈和演奏乐器的经历有关。结果:大多数参与者报告在他们的活动中同时使用视觉和动觉MI。在各种活动中,频繁的体验与更准确的手侧度判断有关,以及增加的生物力学约束效应,特别是从手掌看手。对于不同的活动类型,个人和团队运动和音乐有显著的影响,但舞蹈没有。参与者的训练水平与外显MI (MIQ-3)的评分有关。结论:使用MI的活动经验影响内隐MI,而正式训练可能对外显MI有更大的影响。MI的活动特异性效应可能反映了不同手表面的动觉和视觉经验的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial and mental health status among older adults in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Threat perception and behavioral reactivity in response to an acute stressor in infant rhesus macaques. Predictors of schoolteachers' intention to report suspected child abuse and neglect cases in Oman: A national study. The effects of image resolution and exposure duration on facial beauty and ugliness evaluations. Effect of floral therapy in mothers of premature newborns: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1