Ravi S Nunna, Maxwell D Gruber, Sasidhar Karuparti, Zachary Taylor, Sabrina Genovese, Fareed Jumah, Periklis Godolias, Zachary Tataryn, Douglas Hollern, Rod Oskouian, Jens R Chapman
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ravi S Nunna, Maxwell D Gruber, Sasidhar Karuparti, Zachary Taylor, Sabrina Genovese, Fareed Jumah, Periklis Godolias, Zachary Tataryn, Douglas Hollern, Rod Oskouian, Jens R Chapman","doi":"10.1177/21925682241310864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSystematic Review Study.ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.ResultsOf the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.ConclusionsThere is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2514-2535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241310864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study DesignSystematic Review Study.ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spine surgeries.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, OVID and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the use of rhBMP-2 for spinal procedures in comparison to autograft and/or allograft and alternative graft materials under consideration of cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost minimization, and/or cost-utility analysis. Relevant data points were extracted and compiled. The standardization of the selected studies was graded using the CHEERS criteria.ResultsOf the 88 eligible publications, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 8 studies showed a favorable cost-analysis profile. Three studies performed cost-consequence analyses, none of which reported positive findings. Among 7 cost-utility analyses and 7 cost-effectiveness analyses, 3 and 5, respectively, reported a likely benefit to the usage of rhBMP-2. The CHEERS scores for the included studies ranged from 15 to 23 out of 24 points, with a median score of 19.ConclusionsThere is no consensus regarding the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion. rhBMP-2 may function as a cost-effective adjunct in spinal fusion surgeries in select cases.
研究设计:系统评价研究。目的:本研究的目的是评估rhBMP-2在脊柱手术中的成本-效果和成本-效用。方法:系统检索PubMed、MEDLINE、OVID和CENTRAL (Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials)数据库,根据成本-效果、成本-收益、成本最小化和/或成本-效用分析,与自体移植物和/或同种异体移植物和替代移植物材料相比,报道在脊柱手术中使用rhBMP-2的研究。提取并整理相关数据点。所选研究的标准化使用CHEERS标准进行分级。结果:88篇入选文献中,17篇符合纳入标准。总的来说,8项研究显示了有利的成本分析概况。三项研究进行了成本-后果分析,没有一项研究报告了积极的结果。在7个成本效用分析和7个成本效益分析中,分别有3个和5个报告了使用rhBMP-2可能带来的好处。所纳入研究的CHEERS得分为15 - 23分(总分24分),中位数为19分。结论:关于rhBMP-2在脊柱融合术中的成本-效果或成本-效用尚无共识。在某些病例中,rhBMP-2可能作为一种经济有效的辅助手段在脊柱融合手术中发挥作用。
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).