Developing an ethical framework for the recruitment of people who inject drugs experiencing incarceration in HIV prevention research: a qualitative study.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Harm Reduction Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01138-z
Matthew Murphy, Nyx Gomes, Kimberly Kane, Josiah D Rich, Lloyd Goldsamt, Jasjit S Ahluwalia, Kate M Guthrie, Susan E Ramsey, Sara Vargas
{"title":"Developing an ethical framework for the recruitment of people who inject drugs experiencing incarceration in HIV prevention research: a qualitative study.","authors":"Matthew Murphy, Nyx Gomes, Kimberly Kane, Josiah D Rich, Lloyd Goldsamt, Jasjit S Ahluwalia, Kate M Guthrie, Susan E Ramsey, Sara Vargas","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01138-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV disproportionately impacts people who experience incarceration. Incarceration represents an opportunity to engage in HIV prevention care for individuals who often experience a number of barriers accessing health services in the community. The development of evidence-based practices promoting pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) is crucial for ending the HIV epidemic within this highly marginalized population. However, PrEP research within carceral facilities has been limited and is hampered in part by the lack of ethical guidance on conducting HIV prevention research in this unique setting where incarcerated individuals are categorized as a vulnerable population requiring specific protections. This lack of knowledge is particularly striking when considering the lack of input from incarcerated individuals themselves on the responsible conduct of research, which is critical to understanding ways to ensure participant autonomy while avoiding coercive practices in research activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to gain a better understanding of ethical approaches to the conduct of HIV prevention research among incarcerated individuals, we conducted qualitative interviews with 21 incarcerated men who reported injecting drugs and met clinical criteria for PrEP use. The interview topics included HIV knowledge, PrEP knowledge, stigma, and perceptions related to ethical research practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes identified included how forced abstinence during incarceration can negatively affect research participation, the importance of participant comfort as it relates to ensuring autonomy in decision making, a desire for person centred approaches in research activities, study staff characteristics impacting participant experience, and perceptions of carceral staff as members of research teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate that conducting research focused on improving PrEP use in a carceral environment has support among those experiencing incarceration. However, researchers should place the participant experience at the center of research protocol development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01138-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: HIV disproportionately impacts people who experience incarceration. Incarceration represents an opportunity to engage in HIV prevention care for individuals who often experience a number of barriers accessing health services in the community. The development of evidence-based practices promoting pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) is crucial for ending the HIV epidemic within this highly marginalized population. However, PrEP research within carceral facilities has been limited and is hampered in part by the lack of ethical guidance on conducting HIV prevention research in this unique setting where incarcerated individuals are categorized as a vulnerable population requiring specific protections. This lack of knowledge is particularly striking when considering the lack of input from incarcerated individuals themselves on the responsible conduct of research, which is critical to understanding ways to ensure participant autonomy while avoiding coercive practices in research activities.

Methods: In order to gain a better understanding of ethical approaches to the conduct of HIV prevention research among incarcerated individuals, we conducted qualitative interviews with 21 incarcerated men who reported injecting drugs and met clinical criteria for PrEP use. The interview topics included HIV knowledge, PrEP knowledge, stigma, and perceptions related to ethical research practices.

Results: Themes identified included how forced abstinence during incarceration can negatively affect research participation, the importance of participant comfort as it relates to ensuring autonomy in decision making, a desire for person centred approaches in research activities, study staff characteristics impacting participant experience, and perceptions of carceral staff as members of research teams.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that conducting research focused on improving PrEP use in a carceral environment has support among those experiencing incarceration. However, researchers should place the participant experience at the center of research protocol development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为在艾滋病毒预防研究中招募经历监禁的注射吸毒者制定道德框架:一项定性研究。
背景:艾滋病毒对经历监禁的人的影响不成比例。监禁为那些在社区获得保健服务时经常遇到一些障碍的个人提供了一个参与艾滋病毒预防护理的机会。发展以证据为基础的做法,促进接触前预防,以预防艾滋病毒(PrEP),对于在这一高度边缘化的人群中结束艾滋病毒流行至关重要。然而,监狱设施内的PrEP研究受到限制,部分原因是缺乏在这种独特环境中进行艾滋病毒预防研究的道德指导,在这种环境中,被监禁的人被归类为需要特殊保护的弱势群体。考虑到被监禁者本人在负责任的研究行为方面缺乏投入,这种知识的缺乏尤其引人注目,这对于理解确保参与者自主权同时避免研究活动中的强制做法的方法至关重要。方法:为了更好地理解在被监禁人员中开展艾滋病毒预防研究的伦理方法,我们对21名报告注射毒品并符合PrEP临床标准的被监禁男性进行了定性访谈。访谈主题包括艾滋病毒知识,PrEP知识,污名和与伦理研究实践相关的看法。结果:确定的主题包括监禁期间强制禁欲如何对研究参与产生负面影响,参与者舒适度的重要性,因为它与确保决策自主权有关,在研究活动中希望采用以人为本的方法,影响参与者体验的研究人员特征,以及对监狱工作人员作为研究团队成员的看法。结论:本研究的结果表明,在监狱环境中开展旨在改善PrEP使用的研究得到了经历监禁的人的支持。然而,研究人员应该把参与者的经验放在研究方案制定的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
期刊最新文献
Developing a comprehensive inventory to define harm reduction housing. Future destinations: how people cured of hepatitis C using direct acting antiviral drugs progress in a new HCV-free world. A thematic analysis. Opioid-related harms and experiences of care among people in justice settings in New South Wales, Australia: evidence from the National Ambulance Surveillance System. Reducing medical cannabis use risk among Veterans: A descriptive study. An exploration of desired abstinent and non-abstinent recovery outcomes among people who use methamphetamine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1