Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12853-9
A Zilioli, A Rosenberg, R Mohanty, A Matton, T Granberg, G Hagman, J Lötjönen, M Kivipelto, E Westman
{"title":"Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting.","authors":"A Zilioli, A Rosenberg, R Mohanty, A Matton, T Granberg, G Hagman, J Lötjönen, M Kivipelto, E Westman","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12853-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12853-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑MRI体积测量和萎缩评定量表作为淀粉样蛋白状态和抗淀粉样蛋白治疗在现实世界记忆诊所设置的资格的预测因子。
预测淀粉样蛋白状态是至关重要的,鉴于即将到来的疾病修饰疗法和需要确定治疗符合条件的阿尔茨海默病患者。在我们的研究中,我们旨在通过(I)比较视觉/自动评分量表和MRI体积分析的表现,(II)将MRI体积数据与神经心理学测试和APOE4状态相结合,预测记忆诊所的csf -淀粉样蛋白状态和抗淀粉样蛋白治疗的资格。290名患者接受了全面评估。cNeuro cMRI软件(Combinostics y)提供自动计算评级量表和体积分析。淀粉样蛋白状态使用数据驱动的脑脊液生物标志物截止值(Aβ42/Aβ40比率)确定,并根据FDA批准抗a β药物aducanumab后发布的最新建议评估抗a β治疗的资格。与视觉评估相比,自动评分量表和体积分析在预测Aβ状态方面表现出更高的性能,特别是在顶叶- gca (AUC = 0.70)、MTA (AUC = 0.66)评分、海马(AUC = 0.68)和角回(AUC = 0.69)体积方面,尽管整体准确性较低。当我们将海马和角回体积与RAVLT即时回忆和APOE4状态相结合时,我们获得了最高的准确性(AUC = 0.82),甚至在预测抗a β治疗资格(AUC = 0.81)方面也保持了很高的准确性。我们的研究表明,萎缩评定量表和脑容量测量的自动分析优于操作员依赖的视觉评定量表。当与神经心理学和遗传信息相结合时,这种计算机化的方法不仅在研究背景下,而且在现实世界的记忆诊所中都可能发挥关键作用。这种整合导致预测淀粉样蛋白-脑脊液状态和抗a β治疗资格的高度准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Sex differences in baseline characteristics, stroke care, and outcomes across socioeconomic settings: a multicentre study from Switzerland, Poland, and Ukraine. Early serum S100β but not neuron-specific enolase reflects baseline CNS vulnerability in ICANS after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Rapid efficacy of efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis patients in acute exacerbations/worsening: multicenter real-world retrospective study. Oculomotor abnormalities in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) reflect midline cerebellar impairment. First multicenter real-world analysis of switching to next-generation enzyme replacement therapies in late-onset Pompe disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1