Trends and impact of endoscopic ultrasound utilization for suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreatology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.001
Lillian Wang , Priyanka Vatsavayi , Shounak Majumder , Ferga C. Gleeson , Elizabeth Rajan , Barham K. Abu Dayyeh , Andrew C. Storm , Shifa Umar , Saran T. Velaga , William S. Harmsen , Santhi S. Vege , Vinay Chandrasekhara
{"title":"Trends and impact of endoscopic ultrasound utilization for suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms","authors":"Lillian Wang ,&nbsp;Priyanka Vatsavayi ,&nbsp;Shounak Majumder ,&nbsp;Ferga C. Gleeson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rajan ,&nbsp;Barham K. Abu Dayyeh ,&nbsp;Andrew C. Storm ,&nbsp;Shifa Umar ,&nbsp;Saran T. Velaga ,&nbsp;William S. Harmsen ,&nbsp;Santhi S. Vege ,&nbsp;Vinay Chandrasekhara","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiple management guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have been published to improve risk stratification and resource utilization. This study aims to evaluate trends in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) use and agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific pancreas cystic lesion (PCL) features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing EUS for suspected IPMN detected with cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRCP) between 2013 and 2015 (Cohort 1) and 2018–2020 (Cohort 2). Clinical, radiographic, EUS, cytologic, and outcomes data were collected. IPMN were defined as high-risk/worrisome (having any Fukuoka high risk (HR) or worrisome feature (WF)), low risk (cyst size 10–29.9 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF), or very low risk (cyst size &lt;10 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kappa statistics were used. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed via post-hoc sensitivity analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 711 patients, 292 (41.1 %) were in Cohort 1. More patients in Cohort 1 underwent EUS for non-high risk/non-worrisome PCL on pre-EUS imaging (65.8 % vs. 54.9 %, P &lt; 0.01). Good agreement between pre-EUS imaging and EUS for WF (84.1 %) and HR (96.6 %) was seen. EUS-FNA impacted surveillance and surgical referral in 29.5 % (P = 0.51). Median surveillance duration was 917 days (IQR 367, 1439 days), during which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was diagnosed in 7.5 % (P = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this series EUS over-utilization for low risk IPMN improved over time reflecting more conservative guidelines, without changing PDAC diagnosis rates. There was good agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific PCL features.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 353-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324008287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multiple management guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have been published to improve risk stratification and resource utilization. This study aims to evaluate trends in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) use and agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific pancreas cystic lesion (PCL) features.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults undergoing EUS for suspected IPMN detected with cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRCP) between 2013 and 2015 (Cohort 1) and 2018–2020 (Cohort 2). Clinical, radiographic, EUS, cytologic, and outcomes data were collected. IPMN were defined as high-risk/worrisome (having any Fukuoka high risk (HR) or worrisome feature (WF)), low risk (cyst size 10–29.9 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF), or very low risk (cyst size <10 mm, without Fukuoka HR or WF). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kappa statistics were used. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed via post-hoc sensitivity analysis.

Results

Of 711 patients, 292 (41.1 %) were in Cohort 1. More patients in Cohort 1 underwent EUS for non-high risk/non-worrisome PCL on pre-EUS imaging (65.8 % vs. 54.9 %, P < 0.01). Good agreement between pre-EUS imaging and EUS for WF (84.1 %) and HR (96.6 %) was seen. EUS-FNA impacted surveillance and surgical referral in 29.5 % (P = 0.51). Median surveillance duration was 917 days (IQR 367, 1439 days), during which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was diagnosed in 7.5 % (P = 0.11).

Conclusions

In this series EUS over-utilization for low risk IPMN improved over time reflecting more conservative guidelines, without changing PDAC diagnosis rates. There was good agreement between cross-sectional imaging and EUS for specific PCL features.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜超声应用于疑似导管内乳头状粘液瘤的趋势和影响。
背景:导管内乳头状粘液瘤(IPMNs)的多种管理指南已经发布,以改善风险分层和资源利用。本研究旨在评估内镜超声(EUS)使用的趋势,以及横断成像和EUS在特定胰腺囊性病变(PCL)特征中的一致性。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2013 - 2015年(队列1)和2018-2020年(队列2)期间连续接受EUS检查的成年人,这些成年人通过横断面成像(CT/MRCP)检测到疑似IPMN。收集了临床、放射学、EUS、细胞学和结局数据。IPMN被定义为高风险/令人担忧的(具有任何福冈高风险(HR)或令人担忧的特征(WF)),低风险(囊肿大小为10-29.9 mm,无福冈高风险或WF)或极低风险(囊肿大小)。结果:711例患者中,292例(41.1%)来自队列1。在队列1中,更多的患者在EUS前成像中接受了非高风险/无担忧PCL的EUS治疗(65.8% vs. 54.9%, P)。结论:在这个系列中,EUS对低风险IPMN的过度使用随着时间的推移而改善,反映了更保守的指导方针,没有改变PDAC诊出率。对于特定的PCL特征,横断成像和EUS之间有很好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy could be a precursor of pancreatic cancer" (Kikuyama et al., Pancreatology 2025). The Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC) 10 years of past accomplishments and looking forward to the next 5 years of the Chronic Pancreatitis Clinical Research Consortium (CPCRC). Response to the Letter to Editor: Strengths and methodological considerations for predicting post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis. Genomic characterization and prognosis of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. Cannabis use in chronic pancreatitis: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1