Examining the potential of an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care: results from a randomized controlled pilot trial

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116326
Gwendolyn Wälchli , Thomas Berger , Christoph Nissen , Franz Moggi , Laura Luisa Bielinski
{"title":"Examining the potential of an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care: results from a randomized controlled pilot trial","authors":"Gwendolyn Wälchli ,&nbsp;Thomas Berger ,&nbsp;Christoph Nissen ,&nbsp;Franz Moggi ,&nbsp;Laura Luisa Bielinski","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The feasibility and the preliminary effectiveness of an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care were assessed with a randomized controlled pilot trial. Sixty patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group or treatment as usual (TAU). Feasibility was evaluated via patient satisfaction, system usability, and program usage. The primary outcome was symptom severity (Brief-Syptom-Inventory-18-GSI), secondary outcomes included two emotion regulation measures. Assessments occurred at baseline, after four weeks (T1), eight weeks (T2), and patient discharge. Satisfaction scores (CSQ-8: <em>M</em> = 2.97, SD = 0.64) and usability ratings (SUS: <em>M</em> = 69.89, SD = 10.34) were positive. Program usage was low, with only 12 of 30 patients completing at least 50 % of the program. In the ITT-analysis, no significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for symptom severity or emotion regulation. Descriptively, effect sizes favored the intervention for symptom severity at T1 (<em>d</em> = 0.16) and T2 (<em>d</em> = 0.12) and favored TAU for the emotion regulation parameters at both time points. Thus, while the internet-based program showed good usability and satisfaction, it did not significantly impact symptom severity or emotion regulation. Future research should examine how to enhance program use in this treatment context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 116326"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124006115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The feasibility and the preliminary effectiveness of an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care were assessed with a randomized controlled pilot trial. Sixty patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group or treatment as usual (TAU). Feasibility was evaluated via patient satisfaction, system usability, and program usage. The primary outcome was symptom severity (Brief-Syptom-Inventory-18-GSI), secondary outcomes included two emotion regulation measures. Assessments occurred at baseline, after four weeks (T1), eight weeks (T2), and patient discharge. Satisfaction scores (CSQ-8: M = 2.97, SD = 0.64) and usability ratings (SUS: M = 69.89, SD = 10.34) were positive. Program usage was low, with only 12 of 30 patients completing at least 50 % of the program. In the ITT-analysis, no significant group-by-time interaction effects were found for symptom severity or emotion regulation. Descriptively, effect sizes favored the intervention for symptom severity at T1 (d = 0.16) and T2 (d = 0.12) and favored TAU for the emotion regulation parameters at both time points. Thus, while the internet-based program showed good usability and satisfaction, it did not significantly impact symptom severity or emotion regulation. Future research should examine how to enhance program use in this treatment context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查基于网络的情绪调节干预增加到急性精神病住院治疗的潜力:来自随机对照试点试验的结果。
本研究采用随机对照先导试验,评估以网路为基础的情绪调节介入急性精神科住院病人护理的可行性及初步效果。60例患者按1:1的比例分配到干预组或照常治疗组(TAU)。可行性通过患者满意度、系统可用性和程序使用情况进行评估。主要结局是症状严重程度(brief - symptom - inventory -18- gsi),次要结局包括两项情绪调节测量。评估分别在基线、4周(T1)、8周(T2)和患者出院后进行。满意度评分(CSQ-8: M = 2.97, SD = 0.64)和可用性评分(SUS: M = 69.89, SD = 10.34)为正。计划的使用率很低,30名患者中只有12名完成了至少50%的计划。在itt分析中,在症状严重程度或情绪调节方面没有发现显著的群体-时间交互效应。描述性地,效应量在T1 (d = 0.16)和T2 (d = 0.12)时对症状严重程度的干预有利,在两个时间点对情绪调节参数的干预都有利。因此,虽然基于互联网的程序显示出良好的可用性和满意度,但它对症状严重程度或情绪调节没有显著影响。未来的研究应该研究如何在这种治疗背景下加强程序的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring cognitive symptoms in patients with unipolar and bipolar major depression: A comparative evaluation of subjective and objective performance Editorial Board Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks A systematic review of the etiology and neurobiology of intermittent explosive disorder Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1