Impact of Dietitian-Delivered Motivational Interviewing Within a Food is Medicine Intervention Targeting Adults Living With and Beyond Cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Cancer Education Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s13187-024-02552-4
Ashlea C Braun, James Portner, Elizabeth M Grainger, Steven K Clinton, Menglin Xu, Amy Darragh, Keeley J Pratt, Lindy L Weaver, Colleen K Spees
{"title":"Impact of Dietitian-Delivered Motivational Interviewing Within a Food is Medicine Intervention Targeting Adults Living With and Beyond Cancer.","authors":"Ashlea C Braun, James Portner, Elizabeth M Grainger, Steven K Clinton, Menglin Xu, Amy Darragh, Keeley J Pratt, Lindy L Weaver, Colleen K Spees","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02552-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food is medicine (FIM) interventions are a strategy for preventing and managing chronic disease via diet. These interventions often combine the provision of food with access to behavior change support (e.g., from registered dietitians (RDs)), though the ideal approach for the latter is not fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to evaluate integrated motivational interviewing (MI) from an RD (RDMI) on outcomes among adults living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) with overweight and obesity enrolled in a FIM intervention (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03489213 (02/09/2018)). Specifically, RDMI with autonomy in the mode of delivery (i.e., phone, email, text, video) and dose (frequency) was offered within a 6-month intensive FIM intervention followed by a 6-month step-down maintenance phase. Dose and engagement with RDMI were measured. There were 52 and 33 participants who requested RDMI during the intensive and maintenance phases, respectively. Completion of ≥ 1 RDMI telephonic encounter significantly predicted weight loss post-intervention (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.07, p = 0.03); there were no differences in dose, engagement, or weight loss based on the mode of delivery. The dose during the intensive intervention was moderately and significantly correlated with weight loss post-intervention and maintenance (r = 0.43, p < 0.01; r = 0.33, p = 0.02, respectively); there was a weak correlation for engagement at the same follow-up points (r = 0.28 and r = 0.15). In conclusion, higher doses of RDMI improved weight loss for adults LWBC with overweight or obesity. Careful consideration of the implementation of MI from providers, including RDs, in the context of cancer-focused FIM interventions should be further examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02552-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food is medicine (FIM) interventions are a strategy for preventing and managing chronic disease via diet. These interventions often combine the provision of food with access to behavior change support (e.g., from registered dietitians (RDs)), though the ideal approach for the latter is not fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to evaluate integrated motivational interviewing (MI) from an RD (RDMI) on outcomes among adults living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) with overweight and obesity enrolled in a FIM intervention (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03489213 (02/09/2018)). Specifically, RDMI with autonomy in the mode of delivery (i.e., phone, email, text, video) and dose (frequency) was offered within a 6-month intensive FIM intervention followed by a 6-month step-down maintenance phase. Dose and engagement with RDMI were measured. There were 52 and 33 participants who requested RDMI during the intensive and maintenance phases, respectively. Completion of ≥ 1 RDMI telephonic encounter significantly predicted weight loss post-intervention (R2 = 0.07, p = 0.03); there were no differences in dose, engagement, or weight loss based on the mode of delivery. The dose during the intensive intervention was moderately and significantly correlated with weight loss post-intervention and maintenance (r = 0.43, p < 0.01; r = 0.33, p = 0.02, respectively); there was a weak correlation for engagement at the same follow-up points (r = 0.28 and r = 0.15). In conclusion, higher doses of RDMI improved weight loss for adults LWBC with overweight or obesity. Careful consideration of the implementation of MI from providers, including RDs, in the context of cancer-focused FIM interventions should be further examined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一种食品中,营养师提供的动机访谈的影响是针对癌症患者和非癌症患者的医学干预。
食物即药物(FIM)干预措施是一种通过饮食预防和管理慢性病的战略。这些干预措施通常将提供食物与获得行为改变支持(例如,从注册营养师(rd))结合起来,尽管后者的理想方法尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是评估来自RD (RDMI)的综合动机访谈(MI)对参加FIM干预的超重和肥胖的癌症(LWBC)患者和非癌症患者(LWBC)的结局(Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03489213(02/09/2018))。具体而言,在6个月的强化FIM干预后,在6个月的逐步减少维持阶段,提供具有自主交付模式(即电话、电子邮件、文本、视频)和剂量(频率)的RDMI。测量RDMI的剂量和作用。分别有52名和33名参与者在强化和维护阶段请求RDMI。完成≥1次RDMI电话会议可显著预测干预后体重下降(R2 = 0.07, p = 0.03);在剂量、接触或体重减轻方面没有基于给药方式的差异。强化干预期间的剂量与干预后体重减轻和维持体重呈中度显著相关(r = 0.43, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
期刊最新文献
"Frontiers in Neoplasia" Curriculum is a Good Start, and More Can be Done. Expanding the Scope of Multidisciplinary Oncology Education: A Necessary Step Forward. An Analysis of Print and Online Media's Representation of Prostate Cancer in Public Figure. 2024 International Cancer Education Conference Abstracts. Are Sport and Exercise Science Students Receiving Enough Training to Adequately Design Exercise Programs for Patients with Cancer, Overweight, or Obesity in Spain? A Comprehensive Archival and Survey Analysis of 52 Spanish Universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1