Mehmet Ali Erkurt , Ahmet Sarici , Abdulkadir Sahin , Ilhami Berber , Gulten Korkmaz , Irfan Kuku , Mehmet Sinan Dal , Serdal Korkmaz , Turgay Ulas , Fevzi Altuntas
{"title":"Effectiveness of ibrutinib in the management of chronic GVHD","authors":"Mehmet Ali Erkurt , Ahmet Sarici , Abdulkadir Sahin , Ilhami Berber , Gulten Korkmaz , Irfan Kuku , Mehmet Sinan Dal , Serdal Korkmaz , Turgay Ulas , Fevzi Altuntas","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) represents a significant adverse event that may ensue following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). In patients resistant to corticosteroids, which is the first-line treatment for cGVHD, ibrutinib is being evaluated as a potential treatment option. In this study, we aimed to share the findings of our multicenter study regarding the outcomes of ibrutinib treatment in patients with corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD who had previously received multiple systemic therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ibrutinib treatment for corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD after Allo-HSCT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 patients diagnosed with cGVHD who received ibrutinib treatment were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 34.5 (20–67). The included patients were followed for a median of 6 (1–30) months. All patients had stem cells collected from the peripheral blood. Fifty percent of the patients had multiple organ involvement, while the other 50 % had single organ involvement. The most frequently affected organs were skin and liver. On average, patients received four (3–5) lines of systemic therapy before ibrutinib treatment. At week 24 of ibrutinib treatment, 10 patients (41.7 %) had a complete response, and 10 patients (41.7 %) had a partial response; at week 48, 8 patients (33.3 %) had a complete response, and 10 patients (41.7 %) had a partial response. The most common hematological side effect after ibrutinib treatment was thrombocytopenia in 5 out of 24 patients, while the most common non-hematological side effect was CMV infection in 6 out of 24 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD, ibrutinib treatment has been demonstrated to be an efficacious option exhibiting an elevated overall response rate and a tolerable side effect profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 1","pages":"Article 104052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224002337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) represents a significant adverse event that may ensue following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). In patients resistant to corticosteroids, which is the first-line treatment for cGVHD, ibrutinib is being evaluated as a potential treatment option. In this study, we aimed to share the findings of our multicenter study regarding the outcomes of ibrutinib treatment in patients with corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD who had previously received multiple systemic therapies.
Material and methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who received ibrutinib treatment for corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD after Allo-HSCT.
Results
A total of 24 patients diagnosed with cGVHD who received ibrutinib treatment were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 34.5 (20–67). The included patients were followed for a median of 6 (1–30) months. All patients had stem cells collected from the peripheral blood. Fifty percent of the patients had multiple organ involvement, while the other 50 % had single organ involvement. The most frequently affected organs were skin and liver. On average, patients received four (3–5) lines of systemic therapy before ibrutinib treatment. At week 24 of ibrutinib treatment, 10 patients (41.7 %) had a complete response, and 10 patients (41.7 %) had a partial response; at week 48, 8 patients (33.3 %) had a complete response, and 10 patients (41.7 %) had a partial response. The most common hematological side effect after ibrutinib treatment was thrombocytopenia in 5 out of 24 patients, while the most common non-hematological side effect was CMV infection in 6 out of 24 patients.
Conclusion
In patients with corticosteroid-resistant cGVHD, ibrutinib treatment has been demonstrated to be an efficacious option exhibiting an elevated overall response rate and a tolerable side effect profile.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.