Jet versus vibrating mesh nebulizer for tobramycin aerosol in spontaneously breathing children with tracheostomies: A simulation study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101455
Natalie V.E. Anderson , William G.F. Ditcham , Barry S. Clements , Britta S. von Ungern-Sternberg
{"title":"Jet versus vibrating mesh nebulizer for tobramycin aerosol in spontaneously breathing children with tracheostomies: A simulation study","authors":"Natalie V.E. Anderson ,&nbsp;William G.F. Ditcham ,&nbsp;Barry S. Clements ,&nbsp;Britta S. von Ungern-Sternberg","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tracheostomy tubes act as foreign bodies, predisposing the surrounding airway to respiratory infections. Initial treatment for infections is topical – nebulized tobramycin – although guidelines for standardized treatment are lacking. To quantify tobramycin delivery to simulated, tracheostomized children to inform future administration guidelines. A breathing simulator was programmed for volume-controlled ventilation at 6 mL.kg<sup>−1</sup>, for a 3 kg and a 16 kg child representing under or over 6-yrs, respectively. Nebulized tobramycin doses based on current guidelines for non-tracheostomized children (80 mg, or 300 mg, under and over 6-yrs, respectively) were delivered using standard hospital protocol, collected on filters, and assayed with chromatography to quantify average tobramycin delivered dose from six replicate measurements. The jet nebulizer delivered more tobramycin than the vibrating mesh nebulizer from an 80 mg (ages &lt;6-yrs) dose for both a 3 kg child: 2.1 <em>vs.</em> 0.7 mg (3 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.047) and a 16 kg child: 8.7 <em>vs.</em> 3.5 mg (5 mm size, <em>p</em> = 0.022), 11.4 <em>vs.</em> 8.3 mg (4 mm size, <em>p</em> = 0.2). The jet nebulizer delivered more tobramycin than the vibrating mesh nebulizer from a 300 mg dose for both a 3 kg child: 8.4 <em>vs.</em> 3.7 mg (3 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.00076) and a 16 kg child: 33.2 <em>vs.</em> 25 mg (5 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.2) but not for a 16 kg child: 39.4 <em>vs.</em> 46.5 mg (4 mm, <em>p</em> = 0.18) The low amount and poor distribution of drug delivered warrants consideration and review of dosing regimens for treatment. Future research should investigate improving the efficiency of drug delivery to tracheostomized children and the safety and efficacy of higher-dosage regimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"Article 101455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824001139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracheostomy tubes act as foreign bodies, predisposing the surrounding airway to respiratory infections. Initial treatment for infections is topical – nebulized tobramycin – although guidelines for standardized treatment are lacking. To quantify tobramycin delivery to simulated, tracheostomized children to inform future administration guidelines. A breathing simulator was programmed for volume-controlled ventilation at 6 mL.kg−1, for a 3 kg and a 16 kg child representing under or over 6-yrs, respectively. Nebulized tobramycin doses based on current guidelines for non-tracheostomized children (80 mg, or 300 mg, under and over 6-yrs, respectively) were delivered using standard hospital protocol, collected on filters, and assayed with chromatography to quantify average tobramycin delivered dose from six replicate measurements. The jet nebulizer delivered more tobramycin than the vibrating mesh nebulizer from an 80 mg (ages <6-yrs) dose for both a 3 kg child: 2.1 vs. 0.7 mg (3 mm, p = 0.047) and a 16 kg child: 8.7 vs. 3.5 mg (5 mm size, p = 0.022), 11.4 vs. 8.3 mg (4 mm size, p = 0.2). The jet nebulizer delivered more tobramycin than the vibrating mesh nebulizer from a 300 mg dose for both a 3 kg child: 8.4 vs. 3.7 mg (3 mm, p = 0.00076) and a 16 kg child: 33.2 vs. 25 mg (5 mm, p = 0.2) but not for a 16 kg child: 39.4 vs. 46.5 mg (4 mm, p = 0.18) The low amount and poor distribution of drug delivered warrants consideration and review of dosing regimens for treatment. Future research should investigate improving the efficiency of drug delivery to tracheostomized children and the safety and efficacy of higher-dosage regimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气管切开术患儿自主呼吸妥布霉素气雾剂喷射与振动网状喷雾器的模拟研究。
气管造口管就像异物一样,使周围气道容易受到呼吸道感染。感染的初始治疗是局部雾化妥布霉素,尽管缺乏标准化治疗的指南。量化妥布霉素给模拟气管造口儿童的剂量,为未来的给药指南提供信息。一个呼吸模拟器被编程为容量控制通气在6毫升。kg-1,分别适用于3公斤和16公斤的儿童,分别代表6岁以下或6岁以上。根据目前未气管造口术儿童的指南(分别为6岁以下和6岁以上的80毫克或300毫克),使用标准医院方案给予雾化妥布霉素剂量,在过滤器上收集,并用色谱法测定6次重复测量的平均妥布霉素剂量。喷射喷雾器比振动网喷雾器从80毫克(年龄)输送更多的妥布霉素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Are corticosteroids in intensive care immunosuppressive? Reflections and hypotheses. Transfusion thresholds after acute brain injury: How can they impact on protocols optimizing brain oxygenation? Transfusion strategy in the most critically patients with trauma brain injury: Differences to other populations? Protecting the lungs during surgery: modes of ventilation are no silver bullet. Cardiac surgery associated-acute kidney injury: deciphering renal physiology to understand effects of amino acids infusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1