Safe Use of Technology in the Operating Room Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.021
Dilay Hacidursunoğlu Erbaş, Fatma Eti Aslan
{"title":"Safe Use of Technology in the Operating Room Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties.","authors":"Dilay Hacidursunoğlu Erbaş, Fatma Eti Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop the Safe Use of Technology in the Operating Room Scale (SUTORS) and evaluation of its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was a scale development study including the validity and reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in training and research hospitals located in Istanbul, Turkey. The sample population comprised all health care professionals working in the operating rooms of the relevant hospitals. A total of 54 health care professionals were recruited for the preliminary implementation, and those who participated were excluded from the final sample. The sample size consisted of 437 health care professionals. The study collected data using the Healthcare Professional Identification Form and the SUTORS. The scope, content, and language appropriateness were evaluated. The data were then analyzed using various statistical methods, including Cronbach's α, halving, principal component analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, discriminative item analysis, cumulative explained variance, and composite reliability values.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The health care professionals had an average age of 30.69 ± 6.64 years and had been working in the operating room for an average of 5.94 ± 5.86 years, and 39.6% of them were nurses. The scale draft consisted of 134 items and 3 sections in total, and a 53-item scale was constructed as a result of content and linguistic validity. On completion of the explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses, the SUTORS, consisting of 45 items and 3 separate scale sections, was finalized. The scale comprises 45 items and 3 distinct sections for general applications, surgical team, and anesthesia team. Cronbach's α values were calculated for each section, resulting in 0.928, 0.906, and 0.946, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three sections of the SUTORS are valid and reliable measures that can be used to assess the safe use of technology in the operating room.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop the Safe Use of Technology in the Operating Room Scale (SUTORS) and evaluation of its psychometric properties.

Design: The study was a scale development study including the validity and reliability analyses.

Methods: The study was conducted in training and research hospitals located in Istanbul, Turkey. The sample population comprised all health care professionals working in the operating rooms of the relevant hospitals. A total of 54 health care professionals were recruited for the preliminary implementation, and those who participated were excluded from the final sample. The sample size consisted of 437 health care professionals. The study collected data using the Healthcare Professional Identification Form and the SUTORS. The scope, content, and language appropriateness were evaluated. The data were then analyzed using various statistical methods, including Cronbach's α, halving, principal component analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, discriminative item analysis, cumulative explained variance, and composite reliability values.

Findings: The health care professionals had an average age of 30.69 ± 6.64 years and had been working in the operating room for an average of 5.94 ± 5.86 years, and 39.6% of them were nurses. The scale draft consisted of 134 items and 3 sections in total, and a 53-item scale was constructed as a result of content and linguistic validity. On completion of the explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses, the SUTORS, consisting of 45 items and 3 separate scale sections, was finalized. The scale comprises 45 items and 3 distinct sections for general applications, surgical team, and anesthesia team. Cronbach's α values were calculated for each section, resulting in 0.928, 0.906, and 0.946, respectively.

Conclusions: All three sections of the SUTORS are valid and reliable measures that can be used to assess the safe use of technology in the operating room.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全使用技术在手术室量表:发展和心理计量学性质。
目的:编制手术室技术安全使用量表(SUTORS)并对其心理测量特性进行评价。设计:本研究为量表开发研究,包括效度和信度分析。方法:本研究在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的培训和研究医院进行。样本人口包括在相关医院手术室工作的所有卫生保健专业人员。总共招募了54名卫生保健专业人员进行初步实施,参与的人员被排除在最终样本之外。样本量由437名卫生保健专业人员组成。本研究使用医疗保健专业人员识别表和SUTORS收集数据。评估范围、内容和语言的适当性。然后使用各种统计方法对数据进行分析,包括Cronbach's α,减半,主成分分析,验证性因子分析,判别项目分析,累积解释方差和复合信度值。结果:医护人员平均年龄为30.69±6.64岁,在手术室工作的平均时间为5.94±5.86年,其中护士占39.6%。量表草案共包括134个题项和3个部分,根据内容和语言效度构建了53个题项的量表。在完成解释性和验证性因素分析后,由45个项目和3个单独的量表部分组成的SUTORS最终确定。该量表包括45个项目,分为普通应用组、外科组和麻醉组3个不同的部分。各切片计算Cronbach’s α值,分别为0.928、0.906、0.946。结论:所有三个部分的SUTORS都是有效和可靠的措施,可用于评估技术在手术室的安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Anxiety and Information Needs Among Patients in the Preoperative Holding Area. Implementation of an Evidence-based Protocol to Increase the Use of Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy. Implementation of Perioperative Anesthesia Considerations for Military Veterans Who Consume Cannabis: A Quality Improvement Project. Effect of Magnetic Ball Pressing Combined With TEAS on Postoperative Nausea, Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Postoperative Thirst in Surgical Patients: A Bibliometric Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1