Comparative effectiveness of self-learning and instructor-assisted pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A prospective randomized study

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106545
Hye Ji Park , Daun Choi , Hoyoen Shim , Choung Ah. Lee
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of self-learning and instructor-assisted pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A prospective randomized study","authors":"Hye Ji Park ,&nbsp;Daun Choi ,&nbsp;Hoyoen Shim ,&nbsp;Choung Ah. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Unlike that for adults, training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infant and child is scarce, and warrants efforts for greater accessibility. Effective self-learning could expand training accessibility and facilitate the development of effective infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training methods.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study was conducted to develop a pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-learning training program, implement nurse training, and evaluate training effectiveness by comparing trainees' achievement of self-efficacy in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with or without instructor assistance.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective randomized controlled study.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>General hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nurses working in a general hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were randomly and sequentially assigned to either an instructor-assisted or a self-learning group and completed a pre-training survey, pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, post-training survey and test, and a 1-year follow-up test. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training was divided into infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 97 participants, instructor-assisted and self-learning groups trained in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed no significant difference in correct chest compressions, ventilation performance, and self-efficacy at the post-training assessment. However compared to the pre-training assessment, these parameters increased significantly in both groups at the post-training assessment (self-efficacy: infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.48, post-training: 17.25 vs pre-training 19.74, post-training 20.05; child cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.78, post-training 17.90 vs pre-training 19.48, post-training 20.55; both <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), respectively. In the self-learning group, at the 1-year follow-up, the rate of correct infant resuscitation compression decreased significantly from 89 (immediate post-training score) to 76 (<em>p</em> = 0.07), without significant intergroup difference. Regarding the time of measurement, although the main effect was significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the interaction effect of instructor-assisted training and time of measurement on pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-efficacy was not.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training did not differ significantly with training modality and improved self-efficacy, which changed significantly over time. These results aid the design of effective self-learning training programs for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 106545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unlike that for adults, training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infant and child is scarce, and warrants efforts for greater accessibility. Effective self-learning could expand training accessibility and facilitate the development of effective infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training methods.

Aim

This study was conducted to develop a pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-learning training program, implement nurse training, and evaluate training effectiveness by comparing trainees' achievement of self-efficacy in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with or without instructor assistance.

Design

Prospective randomized controlled study.

Settings

General hospital.

Participants

Nurses working in a general hospital.

Methods

Participants were randomly and sequentially assigned to either an instructor-assisted or a self-learning group and completed a pre-training survey, pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, post-training survey and test, and a 1-year follow-up test. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training was divided into infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.

Results

Among the 97 participants, instructor-assisted and self-learning groups trained in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed no significant difference in correct chest compressions, ventilation performance, and self-efficacy at the post-training assessment. However compared to the pre-training assessment, these parameters increased significantly in both groups at the post-training assessment (self-efficacy: infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.48, post-training: 17.25 vs pre-training 19.74, post-training 20.05; child cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.78, post-training 17.90 vs pre-training 19.48, post-training 20.55; both p < 0.001), respectively. In the self-learning group, at the 1-year follow-up, the rate of correct infant resuscitation compression decreased significantly from 89 (immediate post-training score) to 76 (p = 0.07), without significant intergroup difference. Regarding the time of measurement, although the main effect was significant (p < 0.001), the interaction effect of instructor-assisted training and time of measurement on pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-efficacy was not.

Conclusion

Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training did not differ significantly with training modality and improved self-efficacy, which changed significantly over time. These results aid the design of effective self-learning training programs for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性随机研究:自学和教师辅助的儿科心肺复苏训练的比较效果。
背景:与成人不同,婴儿和儿童心肺复苏的培训是稀缺的,需要努力提高可及性。有效的自我学习可以扩大培训的可及性,促进有效的婴幼儿心肺复苏培训方法的发展。目的:本研究旨在制定小儿心肺复苏自我学习培训计划,实施护士培训,并通过比较在有指导员和无指导员指导下,学员在小儿心肺复苏中自我效能感的实现情况来评估培训效果。设计:前瞻性随机对照研究。工作地点:综合医院。参与者:在综合医院工作的护士。方法:随机分为教师辅助组和自学组,完成训练前调查、儿童心肺复苏训练、训练后调查和测试以及1年随访测试。小儿心肺复苏训练分为婴儿心肺复苏训练和儿童心肺复苏训练。结果:在97名参与者中,接受过儿科心肺复苏培训的教师辅助组和自学组在正确胸外按压、通气表现和培训后评估的自我效能方面没有显著差异。然而,与训练前评估相比,两组在训练后评估中这些参数均显著增加(自我效能:婴儿心肺复苏:训练前15.48,训练后17.25 vs训练前19.74,训练后20.05;儿童心肺复苏:训练前15.78,训练后17.90 vs训练前19.48,训练后20.55;结论:小儿心肺复苏训练与训练方式及自我效能感的改善无显著差异,且随时间变化显著。这些结果有助于设计有效的儿童心肺复苏自学训练方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nursing curricula in Indonesia and Scandinavia: What can we learn from each other to strengthen nursing education Nursing in tune: Evaluation of the effectiveness of podcasts as an educational tool for undergraduate students - A cross-sectional study Editorial Board Registered nurses' experiences of the graduate nurse residency program: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1