Incidence of primary care chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis with routine care data.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y
Simone van den Bulk, Jasper W A van Egeraat, Annelieke H J Petrus, Mattijs E Numans, Tobias N Bonten
{"title":"Incidence of primary care chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis with routine care data.","authors":"Simone van den Bulk, Jasper W A van Egeraat, Annelieke H J Petrus, Mattijs E Numans, Tobias N Bonten","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdown had profound effects on society and healthcare. Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses. However, the pattern of chest pain in primary care is not clear yet. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center) Academic Network (ELAN) in the Netherlands were used. Chest pain consultations from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the incidence rate (IR) of chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown to the expected IR. Secondary outcomes were the type of consultations, referral proportions, and the IR of registered ACS diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 9,908 chest pain consultations were included. During the COVID-19 lockdown the IR was 6.16 per 1000 person-years while the expected IR was 7.55 (95% CI 7.03-8.12). The immediate effect of the lockdown yielded an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77). A similar decrease was seen for ACS diagnoses (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79), with no compensatory increase after the lockdown (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21). Face-to-face consultations shifted to telephone consultations (p < 0.001) and hospital referrals decreased (9.9% vs. 19.0% (p < 0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown the number of chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly. In addition, fewer patients were assessed face-to-face and fewer patients were referred to the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 lockdown had profound effects on society and healthcare. Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses. However, the pattern of chest pain in primary care is not clear yet. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.

Methods: Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center) Academic Network (ELAN) in the Netherlands were used. Chest pain consultations from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the incidence rate (IR) of chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown to the expected IR. Secondary outcomes were the type of consultations, referral proportions, and the IR of registered ACS diagnoses.

Results: In total 9,908 chest pain consultations were included. During the COVID-19 lockdown the IR was 6.16 per 1000 person-years while the expected IR was 7.55 (95% CI 7.03-8.12). The immediate effect of the lockdown yielded an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77). A similar decrease was seen for ACS diagnoses (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79), with no compensatory increase after the lockdown (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21). Face-to-face consultations shifted to telephone consultations (p < 0.001) and hospital referrals decreased (9.9% vs. 19.0% (p < 0.001)).

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 lockdown the number of chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly. In addition, fewer patients were assessed face-to-face and fewer patients were referred to the hospital.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间初级保健胸痛咨询的发生率:常规护理数据的中断时间序列分析
背景:新冠肺炎疫情封锁对社会和医疗保健产生了深远影响。心脏病科报告胸痛评估和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)诊断下降。然而,胸痛在初级保健中的模式尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估COVID-19封锁对初级保健中出现胸痛的患者数量的影响。方法:使用来自荷兰莱顿大学医学中心校外学术网络(ELAN)的常规初级保健数据。包括2017年1月至2020年12月的胸痛咨询。进行了中断时间序列分析,以比较COVID-19封锁期间胸痛咨询的发病率(IR)与预期IR。次要结果是咨询类型、转诊比例和注册ACS诊断的IR。结果:共纳入9908例胸痛咨询。在COVID-19封锁期间,IR为每1000人年6.16人,而预期IR为7.55人(95% CI 7.03-8.12)。封锁的直接影响导致发病率比(IRR)为0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77)。ACS诊断中也出现了类似的下降(IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79),封锁后没有代偿性增加(IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21)。结论:在COVID-19封锁期间,初级保健的胸痛咨询次数和登记的ACS诊断次数显着下降。此外,面对面评估的患者减少,转诊到医院的患者减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of an in-office intervention to improve general practitioners' support for tobacco smoking cessation: results from a randomised controlled trial (TABAC-PRO). How prepared are urban primary care facilities to manage hypertension and type 2 diabetes in Dhaka, Bangladesh? A cross-sectional descriptive study of government urban dispensaries and NGO clinics. Joint consultations with general practitioners and geriatric psychiatrists for older adults with depression: a focus group study. Type 2 diabetes care: knowledge and clinical practice among medical practitioners at Medical Teaching Institute Mardan, Pakistan - a cross-sectional study. Factors associated with higher cardiovascular disease risk awareness among patients with cardiovascular risk factors in primary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1