Mindfulness Interventions in Older Adults for Mental Health and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbae205
Paul Verhaeghen, Shelley N Aikman, Grazia Mirabito
{"title":"Mindfulness Interventions in Older Adults for Mental Health and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Paul Verhaeghen, Shelley N Aikman, Grazia Mirabito","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mindfulness interventions are consistently associated with beneficial effects in younger adults. In this meta-analysis, we seek to quantify the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for the mental health and well-being of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We include 46 studies that implemented a mindfulness intervention (MBSR = 20; MBCT = 9; ad hoc protocol = 17) with older adults (samples with an average age of 60 or older; healthy adults = 20; adults with underlying symptoms = 26), examining a wide range of outcome measures (e.g., stress, quality of life, sleep).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mindfulness interventions in older adults yielded an estimated Hedges' g of 0.25. Moderator analyses revealed three significant effects. Type of intervention mattered, with the effect size for MBSR not significantly different from zero (Hedges' g = 0.12) while the effect sizes for MBCT (Hedges' g = 0.33) and \"other\" interventions (Hedges' g = 0.36) were. Outcome measure mattered, with significant beneficial effect sizes for mental functioning (Hedges' g = 0.59), depression (Hedges' g = 0.35), sleep (Hedges' g = 0.39), anxiety (Hedges' g = 0.32), \"other\" (Hedges' g = 0.24), stress (Hedges' g = 0.22) and mindfulness (Hedges' g = 0.23). Finally, whether the outcome was targeted (e.g., measures of depression in a population suffering from major depressive disorder) mattered: variables that measured targeted outcomes yielded stronger effects (Hedges' g = 0.30).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mindfulness interventions with older adults are effective, but modestly so. The extant literature is limited by reliance on modified interventions that have not been evaluated for effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mindfulness interventions are consistently associated with beneficial effects in younger adults. In this meta-analysis, we seek to quantify the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for the mental health and well-being of older adults.

Methods: We include 46 studies that implemented a mindfulness intervention (MBSR = 20; MBCT = 9; ad hoc protocol = 17) with older adults (samples with an average age of 60 or older; healthy adults = 20; adults with underlying symptoms = 26), examining a wide range of outcome measures (e.g., stress, quality of life, sleep).

Results: Mindfulness interventions in older adults yielded an estimated Hedges' g of 0.25. Moderator analyses revealed three significant effects. Type of intervention mattered, with the effect size for MBSR not significantly different from zero (Hedges' g = 0.12) while the effect sizes for MBCT (Hedges' g = 0.33) and "other" interventions (Hedges' g = 0.36) were. Outcome measure mattered, with significant beneficial effect sizes for mental functioning (Hedges' g = 0.59), depression (Hedges' g = 0.35), sleep (Hedges' g = 0.39), anxiety (Hedges' g = 0.32), "other" (Hedges' g = 0.24), stress (Hedges' g = 0.22) and mindfulness (Hedges' g = 0.23). Finally, whether the outcome was targeted (e.g., measures of depression in a population suffering from major depressive disorder) mattered: variables that measured targeted outcomes yielded stronger effects (Hedges' g = 0.30).

Discussion: Mindfulness interventions with older adults are effective, but modestly so. The extant literature is limited by reliance on modified interventions that have not been evaluated for effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念干预对老年人心理健康和幸福的影响:一项荟萃分析。
目的:正念干预始终与年轻人的有益效果相关。在本荟萃分析中,我们试图量化正念干预对老年人心理健康和福祉的有效性。方法:我们纳入了46项实施正念干预的研究(MBSR = 20;MBCT = 9;AD hoc方案= 17)老年人(样本平均年龄为60岁或以上;健康成人= 20;有潜在症状的成人= 26),检查了广泛的结果测量(例如,压力、生活质量、睡眠)。结果:正念干预在老年人中产生的hedge ' g估计为0.25。调节因子分析显示了三个显著的影响。干预类型很重要,MBSR的效应值与零没有显著差异(Hedges' g = 0.12),而MBCT (Hedges' g = 0.33)和“其他”干预(Hedges' g = 0.36)的效应值与零没有显著差异。结果测量很重要,心理功能(赫奇斯的g = 0.59)、抑郁(赫奇斯的g = 0.35)、睡眠(赫奇斯的g = 0.39)、焦虑(赫奇斯的g = 0.32)、“其他”(赫奇斯的g = 0.24)、压力(赫奇斯的g = 0.22)和正念(赫奇斯的g = 0.23)的有益效应显著。最后,结果是否有针对性(例如,在患有重度抑郁症的人群中测量抑郁症)很重要:测量目标结果的变量产生了更强的效果(赫奇斯的g = 0.30)。讨论:正念干预对老年人是有效的,但效果有限。现有的文献是有限的,依赖于改良的干预措施,没有评估其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
期刊最新文献
Insights into the Heterogeneity of Cognitive Aging: A Comparative Analysis of Two Data-Driven Clustering Algorithms. Computational Phenotyping of Cognitive Decline With Retest Learning. Integrating Machine Learning and Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for the Early Detection of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. Deciphering Key Features of Social Resilience Versus Social Vulnerability in Later Life: A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Asymmetry. Education, Occupational Environment, and Cognitive Function in Later Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1