A dual-focus approach for evaluating contributors to chronic pain: The roles of psychosocial risk and resilience factors

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101981
Jenna M. Wilson , Kylie Steinhilber, Jolin B. Yamin, Robert R. Edwards, Samantha M. Meints
{"title":"A dual-focus approach for evaluating contributors to chronic pain: The roles of psychosocial risk and resilience factors","authors":"Jenna M. Wilson ,&nbsp;Kylie Steinhilber,&nbsp;Jolin B. Yamin,&nbsp;Robert R. Edwards,&nbsp;Samantha M. Meints","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been a predominant focus on psychosocial risk factors associated with poor pain outcomes among individuals with chronic pain. However, it is also important to identify resilience factors that may mitigate the negative impact of or confer successful adaptation to pain. We argue for a dual-focus approach that evaluates the contributions of both risk and resilience factors. Person-centered statistical techniques (cluster analysis) may be beneficial to phenotype individuals based on their psychosocial characteristics to help inform treatment selection. Identifying treatment moderators based on individual-level characteristics (race/ethnicity) may provide insight into differences in treatment efficacy. Utilizing a holistic approach can inform the development and implementation of culturally adapted and personalized treatments aimed at reducing risk and bolstering resilience factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101981"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24001945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a predominant focus on psychosocial risk factors associated with poor pain outcomes among individuals with chronic pain. However, it is also important to identify resilience factors that may mitigate the negative impact of or confer successful adaptation to pain. We argue for a dual-focus approach that evaluates the contributions of both risk and resilience factors. Person-centered statistical techniques (cluster analysis) may be beneficial to phenotype individuals based on their psychosocial characteristics to help inform treatment selection. Identifying treatment moderators based on individual-level characteristics (race/ethnicity) may provide insight into differences in treatment efficacy. Utilizing a holistic approach can inform the development and implementation of culturally adapted and personalized treatments aimed at reducing risk and bolstering resilience factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估慢性疼痛的双重焦点方法:心理社会风险和恢复力因素的作用
在慢性疼痛患者中,主要关注与不良疼痛结果相关的社会心理风险因素。然而,确定可能减轻疼痛负面影响或成功适应疼痛的恢复力因素也很重要。我们主张采用双焦点方法来评估风险和弹性因素的贡献。以人为中心的统计技术(聚类分析)可能对基于个体心理社会特征的表型个体有益,有助于为治疗选择提供信息。根据个体水平特征(种族/民族)确定治疗调节因子可能有助于深入了解治疗效果的差异。利用整体方法可以为制定和实施适应文化的个性化治疗提供信息,旨在降低风险并增强复原力因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
期刊最新文献
Green healing: Ecotherapy as a transformative model of health and social care Changing norms of trust Reframing pain care: An equity lens on psychosocial and behavioural interventions Editorial Board Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1