Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation insight from the OPTION trial
Lili Xu MD , Huajie Xu MD , Shujing Wu MD , Huanyi Zhang MB , Kang Cheng MD , Xiaoyan Wang MD , Manhua Chen MB , Guangping Li MD , Jiangnan Huang MD , Jun Lan MM , Guanghe Wei MM , Xin Zhao MD , Zhiyong Qi MD , Juying Qian MD , Hongyi Wu MD , Junbo Ge MD
{"title":"Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation insight from the OPTION trial","authors":"Lili Xu MD , Huajie Xu MD , Shujing Wu MD , Huanyi Zhang MB , Kang Cheng MD , Xiaoyan Wang MD , Manhua Chen MB , Guangping Li MD , Jiangnan Huang MD , Jun Lan MM , Guanghe Wei MM , Xin Zhao MD , Zhiyong Qi MD , Juying Qian MD , Hongyi Wu MD , Junbo Ge MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It remains unclear whether indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) preserves ischemic protection while limiting bleeding risk in patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of indobufen-based DAPT in patients with MVD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients in the OPTION trial were stratified based on the presence of MVD. We compared the ischemic and bleeding risks of indobufen-based DAPT (indobufen 100mg twice a day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) vs conventional DAPT (aspirin 100 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) in patients with and without MVD, using landmarks at 6 months and 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with MVD tended to be older and contained a higher prevalence of high-risk features. Compared with patients without MVD, those with MVD were at higher risk for net adverse clinical events and ischemic events. The risk of ischemic events between indobufen-based DAPT vs conventional DAPT was similar either in patients with MVD or without MVD during the first and second 6 months. During the first 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT decreased the risk of bleeding events consistently in patients with and without MVD. Of note, during the second 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT continually decreased the risk of bleeding events in patients with MVD but not in those without MVD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with MVD, indobufen plus clopidogrel DAPT compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel DAPT could reduce the risk of bleeding events while preserving ischemic protection during both the first and second 6 months post-PCI. Indobufen presents an effective option for patients with MVD, especially those at high ischemic risk requiring DAPT beyond 6 months post-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The trial was registered at <span><span>www.chictr.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Indobufen vs Aspirin after Coronary Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: the OPTION Trial (ChiCTR-IIR-17013505).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"282 ","pages":"Pages 21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324003351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
It remains unclear whether indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) preserves ischemic protection while limiting bleeding risk in patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of indobufen-based DAPT in patients with MVD.
Methods
Patients in the OPTION trial were stratified based on the presence of MVD. We compared the ischemic and bleeding risks of indobufen-based DAPT (indobufen 100mg twice a day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) vs conventional DAPT (aspirin 100 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) in patients with and without MVD, using landmarks at 6 months and 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Results
Patients with MVD tended to be older and contained a higher prevalence of high-risk features. Compared with patients without MVD, those with MVD were at higher risk for net adverse clinical events and ischemic events. The risk of ischemic events between indobufen-based DAPT vs conventional DAPT was similar either in patients with MVD or without MVD during the first and second 6 months. During the first 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT decreased the risk of bleeding events consistently in patients with and without MVD. Of note, during the second 6 months, indobufen-based DAPT continually decreased the risk of bleeding events in patients with MVD but not in those without MVD.
Conclusions
In patients with MVD, indobufen plus clopidogrel DAPT compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel DAPT could reduce the risk of bleeding events while preserving ischemic protection during both the first and second 6 months post-PCI. Indobufen presents an effective option for patients with MVD, especially those at high ischemic risk requiring DAPT beyond 6 months post-PCI.
Trial registration
The trial was registered at www.chictr.org. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Indobufen vs Aspirin after Coronary Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: the OPTION Trial (ChiCTR-IIR-17013505).
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.