The Co-Occurrence of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Provocation and State Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults with Concussion.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0472
Melissa N Womble, Kori J Durfee, Sabrina Jennings, Sheri Fedor, Aaron J Zynda, Philip Schatz, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos, R J Elbin
{"title":"The Co-Occurrence of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Provocation and State Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults with Concussion.","authors":"Melissa N Womble, Kori J Durfee, Sabrina Jennings, Sheri Fedor, Aaron J Zynda, Philip Schatz, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos, R J Elbin","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety are both independently linked to poor recovery outcomes following concussion. However, the relationship between these two clinical presentations and their co-occurring effects on concussion recovery outcomes is understudied. The purpose was to examine the co-occurring effects of vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety following concussion. There were 532 participants (15-25 years) with concussions who completed the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale within 30 days of injury. Participants were classified into provocation (PROV) and no provocation (NO PROV) groups based on exceeding/not exceeding VOMS cutoffs. An analysis of covariance was used to examine between-group comparisons on state anxiety scores; and logistic regressions, with adjusted odds ratios (Adj OR), were used to evaluate predictors of clinical levels of state anxiety and protracted recovery. A total of 418 participants (78.6%; age = 17.2 ± 2.6; 65% female) exceeding VOMS cutoffs were in the PROV, and 114 (21.4%; age = 16.6 ± 2.2; 53% female) participants were in the NO PROV group. The PROV group (mean [<i>M</i>] <i>=</i> 39.50, standard deviation [<i>SD</i>] <i>=</i> 12.05) exhibited significantly higher state anxiety scores than the NO PROV group (<i>M =</i> 32.45, <i>SD =</i> 10.43) (<i>F</i>[1, 532] = 15.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup>= 0.03). Vestibular/ocular motor provocation (Adj OR =3.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-3.88) was the most robust predictor of clinical state anxiety following concussion (χ<sup>2</sup> [4, 532] = 86.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants exhibiting vestibular/ocular motor provocation with clinical levels of state anxiety were at 2.47 times (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.53-3.99) greater odds of experiencing a protracted concussion recovery than participants with vestibular/ocular motor provocation without clinical state anxiety. Vestibular/ocular motor provocation is associated with increased state anxiety following concussion, and the addition of clinical state anxiety to vestibular/ocular motor provocation increases the odds for protracted recovery. Clinicians should assess vestibular/ocular motor function and anxiety following concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety are both independently linked to poor recovery outcomes following concussion. However, the relationship between these two clinical presentations and their co-occurring effects on concussion recovery outcomes is understudied. The purpose was to examine the co-occurring effects of vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety following concussion. There were 532 participants (15-25 years) with concussions who completed the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale within 30 days of injury. Participants were classified into provocation (PROV) and no provocation (NO PROV) groups based on exceeding/not exceeding VOMS cutoffs. An analysis of covariance was used to examine between-group comparisons on state anxiety scores; and logistic regressions, with adjusted odds ratios (Adj OR), were used to evaluate predictors of clinical levels of state anxiety and protracted recovery. A total of 418 participants (78.6%; age = 17.2 ± 2.6; 65% female) exceeding VOMS cutoffs were in the PROV, and 114 (21.4%; age = 16.6 ± 2.2; 53% female) participants were in the NO PROV group. The PROV group (mean [M] = 39.50, standard deviation [SD] = 12.05) exhibited significantly higher state anxiety scores than the NO PROV group (M = 32.45, SD = 10.43) (F[1, 532] = 15.36, p < 0.001, η2= 0.03). Vestibular/ocular motor provocation (Adj OR =3.35, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-3.88) was the most robust predictor of clinical state anxiety following concussion (χ2 [4, 532] = 86.78, p < 0.001). Participants exhibiting vestibular/ocular motor provocation with clinical levels of state anxiety were at 2.47 times (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.53-3.99) greater odds of experiencing a protracted concussion recovery than participants with vestibular/ocular motor provocation without clinical state anxiety. Vestibular/ocular motor provocation is associated with increased state anxiety following concussion, and the addition of clinical state anxiety to vestibular/ocular motor provocation increases the odds for protracted recovery. Clinicians should assess vestibular/ocular motor function and anxiety following concussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年和青年脑震荡患者前庭/眼运动刺激和状态焦虑的共同发生。
前庭/眼运动刺激和状态焦虑都与脑震荡后较差的恢复结果独立相关。然而,这两种临床表现及其共同发生对脑震荡恢复结果的影响之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。目的是研究脑震荡后前庭/眼运动刺激和状态焦虑的共同作用。532名15-25岁的脑震荡患者在受伤后30天内完成了前庭/眼运动筛查(VOMS)、状态-特质焦虑量表和脑震荡后症状量表。根据超过/不超过VOMS截止值,将参与者分为挑衅组(PROV)和无挑衅组(no PROV)。采用协方差分析检验组间状态焦虑评分的比较;并采用调整优势比(Adj OR)的逻辑回归来评估临床状态焦虑水平和延迟恢复的预测因素。共有418名参与者(78.6%;年龄= 17.2±2.6;超过VOMS截止值的有114例(21.4%);年龄= 16.6±2.2;NO PROV组有53%的参与者(女性)。PROV组(均值[M] = 39.50,标准差[SD] = 12.05)的状态焦虑得分显著高于NO PROV组(M = 32.45, SD = 10.43) (F[1,532] = 15.36, p < 0.001, η2= 0.03)。前庭/眼运动刺激(Adj OR =3.35, p < 0.001, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.42-3.88)是脑震荡后临床状态焦虑的最可靠预测因子(χ2 [4,532] = 86.78, p < 0.001)。前庭/眼运动诱发伴临床状态焦虑的受试者经历持续性脑震荡恢复的几率是前庭/眼运动诱发无临床状态焦虑受试者的2.47倍(p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.53-3.99)。前庭/眼运动刺激与脑震荡后状态焦虑的增加有关,在前庭/眼运动刺激中增加临床状态焦虑增加了长期恢复的几率。临床医生应评估脑震荡后的前庭/眼运动功能和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Human Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. Sex Differences in Neurological Outcome at 6 and 12 Months Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. An Observational Analysis of the OXY-TC Trial. Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma (TOP-NT) Pre-Clinical Consortium Study: A Synopsis. Prospective Harmonization, Common Data Elements, and Sharing Strategies for Multicenter Pre-Clinical Traumatic Brain Injury Research in the Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma Consortium. Impact of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy on Mental Health and Multidimensional Outcome and Quality of Life: An NIDILRR TBIMS Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1