Alterations of upper-extremity functional muscle networks in chronic stroke survivors.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06973-x
David O'Reilly, Ioannis Delis
{"title":"Alterations of upper-extremity functional muscle networks in chronic stroke survivors.","authors":"David O'Reilly, Ioannis Delis","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06973-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current clinical assessment tools don't fully capture the genuine neural deficits experienced by chronic stroke survivors and, consequently, they don't fully explain motor function throughout everyday life. Towards addressing this problem, here we aimed to characterise post-stroke alterations in upper-limb control from a novel perspective to the muscle synergy by applying, for the first time, a computational approach that quantifies diverse types of functional muscle interactions (i.e. functionally-similar (redundant), -complementary (synergistic) and -independent (unique)). From single-trials of a simple forward pointing movement, we extracted networks of functionally diverse muscle interactions from chronic stroke survivors and unimpaired controls, identifying shared and group-specific modules across each interaction type (i.e. redundant, synergistic and unique). Reconciling previous studies, we found evidence for both the concurrent preservation of healthy functional modules post-stroke and muscle network structure alterations underpinned by systemic muscle interaction re-weighting and functional reorganisation across all interaction types. Cluster analysis of stroke survivors revealed two distinct patient subgroups from each interaction type that all distinguished less impaired individuals who were able to adopt novel motor patterns different to unimpaired controls from more severely impaired individuals who did not. Our work here provides a nuanced account of post-stroke functional impairment and, in doing so, paves new avenues towards progressing the clinical use case of muscle synergy analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06973-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current clinical assessment tools don't fully capture the genuine neural deficits experienced by chronic stroke survivors and, consequently, they don't fully explain motor function throughout everyday life. Towards addressing this problem, here we aimed to characterise post-stroke alterations in upper-limb control from a novel perspective to the muscle synergy by applying, for the first time, a computational approach that quantifies diverse types of functional muscle interactions (i.e. functionally-similar (redundant), -complementary (synergistic) and -independent (unique)). From single-trials of a simple forward pointing movement, we extracted networks of functionally diverse muscle interactions from chronic stroke survivors and unimpaired controls, identifying shared and group-specific modules across each interaction type (i.e. redundant, synergistic and unique). Reconciling previous studies, we found evidence for both the concurrent preservation of healthy functional modules post-stroke and muscle network structure alterations underpinned by systemic muscle interaction re-weighting and functional reorganisation across all interaction types. Cluster analysis of stroke survivors revealed two distinct patient subgroups from each interaction type that all distinguished less impaired individuals who were able to adopt novel motor patterns different to unimpaired controls from more severely impaired individuals who did not. Our work here provides a nuanced account of post-stroke functional impairment and, in doing so, paves new avenues towards progressing the clinical use case of muscle synergy analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性中风幸存者上肢功能性肌肉网络的改变。
目前的临床评估工具并不能完全捕捉到慢性中风幸存者所经历的真正的神经缺陷,因此,它们不能完全解释日常生活中的运动功能。为了解决这个问题,我们的目标是从一个新的角度来描述中风后上肢控制的变化,通过首次应用一种计算方法来量化不同类型的功能性肌肉相互作用(即功能相似(冗余)、互补(协同)和独立(独特))。从简单的向前指向运动的单次试验中,我们从慢性中风幸存者和未受损的对照组中提取了功能多样化的肌肉相互作用网络,确定了每种相互作用类型(即冗余、协同和独特)的共享和群体特定模块。与之前的研究相一致,我们发现中风后健康功能模块的同时保存和肌肉网络结构改变的证据,这些改变是由所有相互作用类型的系统性肌肉相互作用重加权和功能重组所支撑的。对中风幸存者的聚类分析显示,每种相互作用类型中都有两个不同的患者亚组,所有这些亚组都区分出受损程度较轻的个体能够采用不同于未受损对照组的新运动模式,而受损程度较重的个体则不能。我们在这里的工作提供了中风后功能损害的细致入微的描述,并在这样做,为推进肌肉协同分析的临床用例铺平了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Intersegmental gait coordination differs by walking ability in subacute stroke. A cross-sectional study of the association between the lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio and pain in parkinson's disease. Dynamic thumb localization and its adaptation: quantification with a novel robotic task. Mental fatigue and brain activation using prolonged task-based fMRI: a systematic review on time-on-task and sequential task paradigms. Research on the influence of MW on situation awareness in shearer monitoring tasks in intelligent coal mines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1