Surgical effect of the medial wall resection of the cavernous sinus for functional pituitary adenomas.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1439909
Xiao Liang, Zhuoqun Li, Mengyang Xing, Wenbo Gao, Pengfei Liu
{"title":"Surgical effect of the medial wall resection of the cavernous sinus for functional pituitary adenomas.","authors":"Xiao Liang, Zhuoqun Li, Mengyang Xing, Wenbo Gao, Pengfei Liu","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1439909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas (PAs) is aimed at achieving maximal tumor resection, relieving the compression, and correcting the disorders of pituitary hormones. Parasellar dural invasion is a primary factor in the failure of the surgery. By comparing the two operations of tumor excision combined with resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus (MW) and simple tumor excision, we further confirmed the clinical effectiveness and safety of the resection technique of the MW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>41 patients with functional pituitary adenoma (FPA) were divided into two groups according to the operation. The experimental group consisted of 20 patients who underwent tumor excision combined with resection of the MW via endonasal transsphenoidal approach and 21 patients who underwent simple pituitary tumor excision as the control group. Both groups were followed up for 12 months and matched for age, sex, BMI, tumor type, Knosp grade, maximum tumor diameter, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary disease. Perioperative-related indicators, biochemical remission rates, tumor recurrence rates, and complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 medial walls were removed in 20 patients, 15 (71%) specimens had pathologically confirmed tumor invasion. Biochemical remission rates and average operative duration in the experimental group were more than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The remaining perioperative indicators, complications, and tumor recurrence rates had no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique of the MW removal via endonasal transsphenoidal approach for FPAs is safe and effective, with a high biochemical remission. The average operative duration for MW removal may be longer than that for simple tumor excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1439909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1439909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas (PAs) is aimed at achieving maximal tumor resection, relieving the compression, and correcting the disorders of pituitary hormones. Parasellar dural invasion is a primary factor in the failure of the surgery. By comparing the two operations of tumor excision combined with resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus (MW) and simple tumor excision, we further confirmed the clinical effectiveness and safety of the resection technique of the MW.

Methods: 41 patients with functional pituitary adenoma (FPA) were divided into two groups according to the operation. The experimental group consisted of 20 patients who underwent tumor excision combined with resection of the MW via endonasal transsphenoidal approach and 21 patients who underwent simple pituitary tumor excision as the control group. Both groups were followed up for 12 months and matched for age, sex, BMI, tumor type, Knosp grade, maximum tumor diameter, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary disease. Perioperative-related indicators, biochemical remission rates, tumor recurrence rates, and complications were assessed.

Results: A total of 21 medial walls were removed in 20 patients, 15 (71%) specimens had pathologically confirmed tumor invasion. Biochemical remission rates and average operative duration in the experimental group were more than in the control group (P < 0.05). The remaining perioperative indicators, complications, and tumor recurrence rates had no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The technique of the MW removal via endonasal transsphenoidal approach for FPAs is safe and effective, with a high biochemical remission. The average operative duration for MW removal may be longer than that for simple tumor excision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海绵窦内侧壁切除术治疗功能性垂体腺瘤的疗效观察。
背景:垂体腺瘤(PAs)的手术治疗旨在最大限度切除肿瘤,缓解压迫,纠正垂体激素紊乱。鞍旁硬膜侵犯是手术失败的主要因素。通过肿瘤切除联合海绵窦内侧壁切除术(MW)和单纯肿瘤切除两种手术的比较,进一步证实了海绵窦内侧壁切除术技术的临床有效性和安全性。方法:41例功能性垂体腺瘤(FPA)患者按手术方式分为两组。实验组20例经鼻内经蝶窦入路行肿瘤切除联合垂体后叶切除术,对照组21例单纯性垂体肿瘤切除术。两组随访12个月,年龄、性别、BMI、肿瘤类型、Knosp分级、最大肿瘤直径、高血压、糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病相匹配。评估围手术期相关指标、生化缓解率、肿瘤复发率和并发症。结果:20例患者共切除21个内侧壁,病理证实肿瘤侵袭15例(71%)。实验组生化缓解率及平均手术时间均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:经鼻内经蝶窦入路去除骨髓微粒安全有效,生化缓解率高。MW切除的平均手术时间可能比单纯肿瘤切除长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Novel techniques for colorectal cancer. Comparison of diverting colostomy and fecal management catheter in fournier gangrene: a retrospective cohort study. Resection of the entire first rib for a malignant tumor via the transclavicular approach: a case report and literature review. Feasibility and clinical utility of digital anthropometry for precise assessment of outcomes after post-bariatric reconstructive plastic surgery. Enhancing laparoscopic simulator performance with eye-tracking video feedback: a mixed-methods pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1