Assessment of Inter- and Intrasurgeon Variability in Preoperative Planning of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation.

Q3 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788783
Geraldo da Rocha Motta Filho, Marcus Vinicius Galvão Amaral, Luis Gustavo Prata Nascimento, André Couto Godinho, Caio Santos Checchia, Mauricio de Paiva Raffaelli, Rafael Peçanha Pitta, Ana Carolina Leal
{"title":"Assessment of Inter- and Intrasurgeon Variability in Preoperative Planning of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation.","authors":"Geraldo da Rocha Motta Filho, Marcus Vinicius Galvão Amaral, Luis Gustavo Prata Nascimento, André Couto Godinho, Caio Santos Checchia, Mauricio de Paiva Raffaelli, Rafael Peçanha Pitta, Ana Carolina Leal","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To evaluate the intra and intersurgeon variability regarding the positioning and selection of implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. <b>Methods</b>  A cross-sectional study assessed computed tomography images of the shoulder joint of patients diagnosed with degenerative joint diseases. The study team included seven specialists in shoulder surgery, representing six different institutions. Surgeons were instructed to plan all cases twice, and then we evaluated inter- and intrasurgeon variability. <b>Results</b>  The interclass correlation for version and inclination showed low agreement concerning inclination (0.26), and moderate agreement for version (0.73) and graft selection (0.54). The intrasurgeon evaluation revealed a moderate correlation for version (0.55), inclination (0.58), and implant selection (0.46), while for lateralization the correlation was high (0.77). <b>Conclusion</b>  This comparative study of preoperative planning by different surgeons showed the lack of consensus on implant positioning parameters during reverse shoulder arthroplasty planning. However, most surgeons tend to plan for zero degrees of version and inclination.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 6","pages":"e950-e957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the intra and intersurgeon variability regarding the positioning and selection of implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Methods  A cross-sectional study assessed computed tomography images of the shoulder joint of patients diagnosed with degenerative joint diseases. The study team included seven specialists in shoulder surgery, representing six different institutions. Surgeons were instructed to plan all cases twice, and then we evaluated inter- and intrasurgeon variability. Results  The interclass correlation for version and inclination showed low agreement concerning inclination (0.26), and moderate agreement for version (0.73) and graft selection (0.54). The intrasurgeon evaluation revealed a moderate correlation for version (0.55), inclination (0.58), and implant selection (0.46), while for lateralization the correlation was high (0.77). Conclusion  This comparative study of preoperative planning by different surgeons showed the lack of consensus on implant positioning parameters during reverse shoulder arthroplasty planning. However, most surgeons tend to plan for zero degrees of version and inclination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估外科医生之间和手术内的差异在术前计划的反向肩关节置换术:一个多中心的评估。
目的探讨逆行肩关节置换术中植入物的位置和选择在术者内部和术者之间的差异。方法对诊断为退行性关节疾病患者肩关节的计算机断层图像进行横断面研究。研究小组包括7名肩部手术专家,代表6个不同的机构。外科医生被要求两次计划所有病例,然后我们评估外科医生之间和外科医生内部的可变性。结果版本和倾斜度的类间相关在倾斜度上一致性较低(0.26),在版本和嫁接选择上一致性中等(0.73)(0.54)。手术内评估显示,版本(0.55)、倾角(0.58)和种植体选择(0.46)的相关性中等,而侧边的相关性很高(0.77)。结论不同术者术前规划的对比研究表明,在逆向肩关节置换术规划中,对假体定位参数缺乏共识。然而,大多数外科医生倾向于计划零度的版本和倾斜度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Implant Removal Complications in Pediatric Orthopedics]. [Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Robotic Assistance]. [Description of Hip Deformities in 5-Year-Old Patients with Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome]. [Loss of Radial Height in Patients Undergoing Fixation with a Distal Volar Anatomical Locking Plate: A Retrospective Study in a Public Institution]. [The Trifurcated Anatomy of The Upper Trunk of The Brachial Plexus: Suprascapular Nerve, Posterior Division, and Anterior Division].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1