Prognostic Impact of CCA Components in Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the differences of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients with a cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) component ≥ 30% or < 30% versus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) prognoses.

Methods: Patients with cHCC-CCA and iCCA after surgery were recruited. All cHCC-CCA patients were divided into two subgroups (CCA components ≥ 30% and < 30%). Then, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to investigate and compare the differences of cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% or < 30% versus iCCAs in RFS and OS prognoses, respectively. The differences of MRI features between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% and < 30% were also compared.

Results: One hundred sixty-four cHCC-CCAs and 146 iCCAs were enrolled. Compared with iCCAs, cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component < 30% had better OS prognosis (HR: 2.888, p = 0.045). However, Cox regression analysis revealed that cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% had poorer RFS (HR: 0.503, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.58, p = 0.033) prognoses than iCCAs. In addition, rim APHE (OR = 0.286, p < 0.001), targetoid diffusion restriction (OR = 0.316, p = 0.019), corona enhancement (OR = 0.481, p = 0.033), delayed enhancement (OR = 0.251, p = 0.001), and LR-M (OR = 1.586, p < 0.001) were significant factors associated with cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30%. Multivariable regression analyses showed that only LR-M (OR = 1.522, p = 0.042) was a significantly independent predictor for cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30%.

Conclusion: cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% had worse prognoses than iCCAs. Therefore, we suggest that the postoperative treatment of cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component ≥ 30% can be based on the treatment strategy for iCCAs.